Not exact matches
So all you god
believers think god wants us to make personal WMDs, ha, ha, ha, you are all being lead by you know who.m I hope you all like
warm weather
cause you facilitate mass murder.
But I have no doubt Global
Warming believers, the corporations and NGO's that profit off them, and the politicians that cater to them would be exclaiming the planet is going to die if these problems were
caused by record heat and not record cold.
Harris cites the work of PhD - level climate scientists and atmospheric physicists who've studied global
warming for decades, and none of these skeptics deny climate science in any general sense of the word — that's another unsupportable talking point from
believers of catastrophic man -
caused global
warming.
I am no longer a «
believer» in human
caused global
warming, there is simply no evidece for more than a small fraction of one degree C per century — and without that and the fertilisation effect of the increased CO2 that we are enjoying, the human race would starve.
Believers of human -
caused global
warming insist that Earth's CO2 (carbon dioxide) has increased abnormally during the latter half of the twentieth century and that the source of abnormal CO2 increase has been the burning of fossil fuels.
True
believers in the theory of man - made climate change can't understand how anyone can question the «overwhelming evidence» that mankind is
causing dangerous global
warming.
Until recently, he was a firm
believer in the theory that humans are
causing catastrophic global
warming.
I have spent a lot of time studying all this, remember, as a once - upon - a-time true
believer in human -
caused global
warming.
You could hardly ask for a better example of psychological projection than
believers of man -
caused global
warming claiming their critics spread misinformation.
If
believers of catastrophic man -
caused global
warming had science conclusions that were above reproach, they'd welcome debate at any opportunity — shooting «live ammo» against their opponents» «blanks» — in order to show everybody just how solid their science is.
Back in the early spring of 2007,
believers of catastrophic man -
caused global
warming were no doubt quite happy with Al Gore's «An Inconvenient Truth» movie, Ross Gelbspan's books, prominent pro-global
warming blogs, mainstream media outlets, and others who gave essentially no fair play to the presentation of detailed climate assessments from skeptic climate scientists.
I concluded my comment pointing out how global
warming believers» misinformation tactic only undermines their
cause.
For the sake of brevity, I took the «official» values of the CO2 radiative forcing and of the Planck parameter as correct, and pointed out to the audience that the major debate between the skeptics and the
believers centers on the overall feedback gain factor, which — in the IPCC's implicit central estimate — is 2.81, almost tripling the
warming that a CO2 doubling
causes before feedbacks are taken into account.
Ironically, just a few years ago,
believers in anthropogenic (man -
caused) global
warming — since renamed «climate change» — claimed cold weather and snow would soon be just a memory.
That is just like all the true
believers that just know evidence that man is
causing dangerous global
warming is out there somewhere, but they never seem to be able to produce it.
Mark Saunders, a professor of geophysics at University College London and an authority on hurricane forecasting, is a staunch
believer that human activity is
causing global
warming in the form of rising sea - surface temperatures - the chief
cause of increased hurricane activity.
Or, are his AGW - biased findings more in line with his being such a devout
believer in human -
caused global
warming that he will say and predict anything, the science be damned.
What we should take away from the whole sorry episode is that this zeal for challenging the character of climate - change skeptics — while excusing both the political / financial connections, and sloppy science, of true
believers because their
cause is supposedly noble — represents the final degeneration of the global
warming movement into pure politics.
If there is one overriding trait among
believers of catastrophic man -
caused global
warming, it is how their narratives to keep the issue alive depend on the public accepting everything surrounding their assertions without question.
He was a careful researcher and a
believer in human -
caused global
warming since the early 1980s who called for the skepticism necessary to produce accurate and credible reports.
At the same time I understand the frustration of Gavin, talking to sceptics all the time and also
believers with limited knowledge, but still, nasty talking and arrogance is not doing any good for your
cause): «As a former advocate of global
warming I must say that your reference to anyone who does not believe as you do as a «crank» offensive to say the least.»