Sentences with phrase «causes more evaporation»

This causes more wave action which mixes colder water in from deep sea, this will cause less evaporation) 4) Negatively: more % water vapor in the atmosphere 5) Positively: evaporation itself causes more evaporation (difference in pressure causes wind and wind and heat together causes more evaporation)

The claim that this is from the extra «back radiation» from more CO2 is the scientific equivalent of bollocks because IR causes more evaporation, not temperature rise.

Increasing cloud cover causes rising temperatures, which in turn causes more evaporation and therefore more clouds and higher temperatures and so on, and so on.

-- Warm air causes more evaporation; air molecules are more active & can hold more moisture High air pressure usually means cooler drier weather.

In that surface warming causes more evaporation; which produces more atmospheric warming and ultimately more clouds; which block sun from the surface; which produces more cooling.

If any of these clouds are formed when the air has more moisture as a result of evaporation, and CO2 forcing causes more evaporation, then that is a channel of negative feedback.

A warming atmosphere causes more evaporation, meaning more water is available for precipitation.

The planet overheated and water on the surface rapidly evaporated, filling the atmosphere with water vapor; the vapor trapped more heat, which caused more evaporation, and so on.

Another factor at play could be the delicate balance between precipitation and evaporation which Arctic lake levels depend on: warmer temperatures and higher winds could cause more evaporation.

The clearest impact of warming on drought is when higher temperatures cause more evaporation and increase water demand, as has happened with this drought.

A stronger wind would I imagine cause more evaporation and cooling of the skin layer, making the skin minus bulk temperature difference even more negative.

Of course, this warm current warms the air above it causing more evaporation and therefore more storms for the western U.S. creating heavy rains, flooding, and mudslides in California and more tornadoes in Florida.

Although the Middle East is not currently rebounding from an ice age, the scientists say those ancient rebounds have things in common with the way the climate is changing today: Rainfall is decreasing and higher temperatures are causing more evaporation that is drying up the land.

So, overall there is more natural warming caused by increasing maxima causing more evaporation and more condensation, at the same time.

Those effects include more rainfall that occurs in heavy downpours, meaning less is absorbed into the earth and more becomes runoff; more rain and less snowfall in the mountains, which means less melting snow to feed rivers in the spring and summer; and higher temperatures causing more evaporation.

Higher temperatures cause more evaporation from the oceans; water vapour is a strong greenhouse gas;

i) Does DLR cause more evaporation?

Is the naturally - occurring 100 W / m ^ 2 variation in observed DLR warming the skin layer (compared the the water below) so that it will cause more evaporation and emission?

Extra DLR from GHGs could: a) increase the temperature of the skin layer - causing more evaporation and radiation from the skin layer OR b) reduce the amount of energy flowing into the skin layer from below.

Shallow water easily heats up causing more evaporation.

Not exact matches

The increased temperatures cause higher evaporation rates meaning more moisture is pulled out of the tees.

While climate change does not cause droughts, it can make them worse, as a warmer atmosphere leads to more evaporation from soils.

Or does the increased evaporation cause more snow on the neighboring land and hence more reflection?

Further, let's agree that this will on average cause more precipitation due to increased evaporation at these higher temperatures (the best data I have seen say that the precipitation trend over the continental US — where we have the best long term records — is up 5 - 10 % over the last century).

CO % 3B2 I would expect that eruptions that cause more cooling, which slow the evaporation / rainfall cycle, would lengthen the time for the aerosol concentration to drop by 1 / e.

I would expect a temperature rise that increased evaporation would, once equilibrium was reached, cause * all * the air to become more humid.

The temperature difference is caused by a range of factors, including dense building materials absorbing more of the sun's energy, fewer trees to provide shade, and less soil to cool by evaporation.

The additional warming causes even more evaporation, followed by cloud formation and more warming, still.

Note 1: A simple hotspot explanation summarized from this article: Increasing CO2 levels causes atmosphere to warm; then atmosphere causes Earth's surface to warm; warming of oceans cause evaporation; increased evaporation leads to more water vapor in the upper troposphere; water vapor is a powerful greenhouse gas that warms the atmosphere even more (positive water vapor feedback); the Earth's surface warms even more; and then auto «repeat and rinse» until Earth's oceans boil, per an «expert.»

The theory is that increasing CO2 will cause a small bit of warming and this will increase evaporation rates (which occur fastest in the tropics) and dumps more water vapour in the atmosphere (water vapour is by far a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2) and this feedback amplification is meant to continue until Earth settles down and finds a new equilibrium temperature.

(right) With the transition from dimming to brightening (1980s — 2000s), the enhanced greenhouse effect has no longer been masked, causing more rapid warming, stronger evaporation / LH, and an intensification of the water cycle.

When the sun heats our tropical oceans, evaporation causes that heated water to become more saline and denser.

These effects are relatively well understood in the lowest level of the atmosphere, the troposphere, where increased warming leads to greater evaporation, causing more water vapour and so further warming, although this is offset to some extent through the formation of clouds that reflect incoming sunlight back into space.

As the planet warms, increasing levels of water vapour in the atmosphere caused by higher evaporation levels form more clouds and snow increasing the albedo of the planet, reflecting heat back into space more efficiently, thus working to regulate the temperature downward.

i) That parcel of air can be caused to expand relative to adjoining air parcels either by direct input of more solar energy where insolation is uneven (as it always is) or indirectly by the injection of potential energy in the form of latent heat of evaporation carried by water vapour.

An increase in global average annual temperature causes an evaporation increase; this means more H2O in the atmosphere to moderate the temperature range, as it always does.

If the energy required for the extra evaporation does all or mostly come from the water then as I have explained it has the potential to more than offset the expected reduction in energy flow that would otherwise be caused by a warmer topmost few microns according to Fourier's Law.

If that cooler 1 mm layer is indeed caused by evaporation drawing energy away upwards then more evaporation should logically cause more cooling of the ocean bulk not less.

If evaporation contributes only a portion of the cooling of that 1 mm layer (some or even most being attributable to conduction and radiation) then more evaporation would still cause even more cooling of that layer and would still be a mechanism for maintaining or increasing the energy flow to the air rather than decreasing it.

Back radiation causes more immediate evaporation and quicker reemission of LWR than does a similar amount of solar radiation.

So if they must be kept seperate, as they must, is it not obvious that the DLR takes care of itself, disappears completely in more evaporation and radiation and providing for the evaporative energy deficit that it causes itself with no knock on effect on anything?

This, in turn, regionally increased albedo (caused more sunlight to be reflected from the land) and reduced evaporation, which further weakened the monsoon (Stewart, 2010).

Somehow you have determined that whatever increase in DLR takes places actually causes more heat to leave the ocean via evaporation.

As this process accelerates, the ice caps melt, releasing more water vapor into the atmosphere via evaporation, further compounding the effect caused by unregulated carbon dioxide emissions.

1) Decrease in earth's albedo 2) Decrease in evaporation (i.e negative factors affecting evaporation) 3) Volcanic activities on earth, e.g. hot lava & hot waters 4) Human activities (AHF), creating heat to move or to stay warm or cold 5) Human activities, e.g. any process to produce energy or cooling causes more greenhouse gases: water vapor and carbon dioxide which trap long wave energy leaving earth.

They claimed a CO2 increase would cause a temperature increase and higher evaporation with more water vapour in the atmosphere.

This claimed that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase, which increases evaporation and more water vapour in the atmosphere.

In addition to causing more downpours, these enhanced evaporation rates are also leading to an increase in drought severity in places that are already dry, like California.