Sentences with phrase «causing dangerous global warming»

For the hypothesis that human carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous global warming has failed the tests to which it has been subjected.

In the comments, on Page 8 oldest - to - newest, Tom Harris of the ICSC is still arguing that humans aren't causing dangerous global warming anyway.

Since it was published four years ago in a United Nations report, hundreds of environmentalists, scientists and policy makers have used the hockey stick in presentations and brochures to make the case that human activity in the industrial era is causing dangerous global warming.

That is just like all the true believers that just know evidence that man is causing dangerous global warming is out there somewhere, but they never seem to be able to produce it.

«Unlike a decade ago, when few scientists dared express doubt that humanity's CO2 emissions are causing dangerous global warming, it seems now that not a week goes by without some leading expert condemning the hypothesis.

CLIMATE change bedwetters love to trash Donald Trump for pulling out of the failed Paris Climate Treaty designed to lower CO2 emissions that are apparently causing dangerous global warming climate change.

We agree that there are a lot of scientists who seem to believe that humans are causing dangerous global warming.

Business has been captured by Climatism, the belief that humans are causing dangerous global warming.

The United States is needlessly penalizing itself and squandering its resource endowment, all because of the big lie that carbon dioxide is causing dangerous global warming.

True believers in the theory of man - made climate change can't understand how anyone can question the «overwhelming evidence» that mankind is causing dangerous global warming.

«There is no convincing scientific evidence that human contribution to greenhouse gases is causing dangerous global warming,» it stated in an official declaration in 2009.

I regret deeply that the attacks on me now appear to have spilled over onto other scientists who have dared to question the degree to which human activities might be causing dangerous global warming, a topic that ought rightly be the subject of rigorous open debate, not personal attack.

The study concluded that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) cause dangerous global warming.

This prescient statement merits careful examination by those who continue to assert the fashionable belief, in the face of strong empirical evidence to the contrary, that human CO2 emissions are going to cause dangerous global warming.

Or do you mean people who disagree with the hypothesis that man made CO2 emissions will cause dangerous global warming?

It is poor public policy that condones restrictions on grazing operations, or taxes on grazing animals, based on disputed theories that claim that bodily emissions from farm animals will cause dangerous global warming.

They appoint the members, control the data and fund most of the research, mostly to prove the human - caused dangerous global warming hypothesis.

Not exact matches

Many governments believe that holding the average global temperature rise caused by man - made warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels gives the world the best chance to avoid dangerous climate change.

• GLOBAL WARMING Physicist Richard A. Muller, although convinced that climate change is real, potentially dangerous and probably caused in part by humans, has disagreed with many climate scientists, asserting that their measurements and analyses are deeply flawed.

Is there dangerous, human - caused global warming affecting the climate of the continental U.S.?

It does not mean that human - caused global warming is not potentially dangerous... just read the published body of research since 1842... or better yet talk to research scientists who are actively publishing in this like I talk to them weekly.

That means wildfires are a dangerous amplifying feedback, whereby global warming causes more wildfires, which release carbon dioxide, thereby accelerating global warming.

A human that causes global warming is more dangerous than natural causes of global warming.

Much of what they said meshed with the overall theme of the meeting, which organizers said was aimed at proving that the recent consensus on dangerous human - caused global warming was shaped more by politics and passion than data.

The trigger was an e-mail chain maintained by Benny J. Peiser, a British social scientist who sends out daily summaries of research questioning dangerous human - caused global warming and international climate treaties, along with other subjects.

Black carbon is the second largest cause of global warming, and this bill will ensure that we have the information we need to address this dangerous pollutant.»

It does not mean that human - caused global warming is not potentially dangerous... just read the published body of research since 1842... or better yet talk to research scientists who are actively publishing in this like I talk to them weekly.

A central dispute was over how scientists can best discuss risks and responses related to inherent, and dangerous, extremes of climate in a world increasingly fixated on how to limit global warming caused by human activity.

I am convinced next Monday there will be a newspaper explaining the cold and the snow was caused by» extremely dangerous human induced runaway global warming as the driver of climate change».

How dangerous it is to question the ruling paradigm of human caused global warming, a once interesting idea that the United Nations latched onto with all the enthusiasm of a fox in a hen coop, simultaneously drawing the interest of various national governments, and dragging with it many unwitting but eager scientifically credentialed sycophants.

Pekka is technically correct if he means the word CAGW only exists in skeptical discourse, as opposed to the thing the word refers to, which is dangerous human caused global warming.

But it is true that some of the fossil - fuel funded groups that formerly argued that there is no global warming have reacted to criticism by changing their argument to «the climate is always changing,» as if that somehow disproves the scientific consensus that human greenhouse - gas emissions are causing dangerous warming.

That means wildfires are a dangerous amplifying feedback, whereby global warming causes more wildfires, which release carbon dioxide, thereby accelerating global warming.

That is decidedly not how this paper is used in public discourse though, I think in many instances this paper is used to say that not only do humans cause global warming, but they are also the major cause and the degree of effect on nature / climate is in some way dangerous and needs to be mitigated.

There is little evidence that global warming is necessarily bad for the world or humans, and especially there is little evidence that it will cause a militarily more dangerous or less stable world, or cause more work or misery for the US Army.

While the greenhouse effect is undeniably real, and while most scientists agree that there has been a rise in global temperatures caused in some part by human emissions of carbon dioxide, no one knows how much more warming will occur this century or whether it will be dangerous.

For an increasing fraction of the world's population, the real climate crisis is not the possibility that dangerous human - caused global warming may someday occur.

There is an initial simple claim, such as «humans are causing potentially dangerous global warming.»

significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming. . .

Keep all this in mind when the President and other Washington politicos bring up «dangerous manmade global warming,» insist that we slash fossil fuel use, and tell us we need to give poor countries billions of dollars a year to compensate them for «losses and damages» they incurred due to warming we caused.

I think actually that the tendency of > scientists to insist that global warming is real and dangerous to convince > stubborn governments is the primary cause of existence of such radicals > like > McIntyre.

To fully understand the nature of the harm caused by this delay it is necessary to understand the policy implications of a «carbon budget» that must limit global emissions to avoid dangerous warming levels..

Tim Ball was a student of H.H. Lamb, who pioneered the modern study of climate change before it was taken over by those promoting dangerous global warming caused by carbon dioxide (CO2).

Although there is considerable scientific evidence that limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C is necessary to prevent very dangerous warming, a fact implicit in the recent Paris Agreement in which nations agreed to work to keep warming as close as possible from exceeding 1.5 degrees C additional warming, if the international community seeks to limit warming to 2 degrees C it must assure that global emissions do not exceed the number of tons of CO2 emissions that will raise atmospheric concentrations to levels that will cause warming of 2 degrees C.

«Climate Change Reconsidered, the 2009 report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), is a comprehensive 880 - page tome that rigorously analyses the IPCC's claim that dangerous global warming has «very likely» been caused by human greenhouse emissions.

These climate scientists warned President Johnson in 1965 not just of the dangers associated with human - caused global warming, but also that we might eventually have to consider geoengineering the climate to offset that warming and the risks that we're causing by inadvertently running a dangerous experiment with the Earth's climate.

From the administration that brought you «man - caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the term «global climate disruption» in place of «global warming» — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.

Proponents of the CAGW gloom and doom disaster scenarios often say that we need to «connect the dots» to understand how CO2 emissions are causing dangerous «accelerated» global warming.

I was amazed at the Government and Green responses to the serious flooding in the English Midlands a couple of years ago, when increassed rainfall due to alleged Man - made Global Warming was trumpeted as a cause for the flooding; anyone who pointed out that generations of covering flood plains with buildings, concrete and ashphalt was quite a dangerous thing to do was derided as a simpleton or an ignoramus.

Has two - decades worth of cumulative CO2 growth in the atmosphere caused the «experts»» predicted dangerous and rapidly accelerating global warming?