Sentences with phrase «ceiling effect»

There is demand from those interested in public mental health for a measure suitable for monitoring mental well - being that does not show ceiling effects in population samples.

Its distribution was near normal and the scale did not show ceiling effects in a population sample.

In some cases, there are ceiling effects where bright students are already scoring near the top and can't show huge gains year after year.

To use a norm - referenced test that is grade - level calibrated to make judgements about students at the top end is not justifiable, given the problems of ceiling effect.

Average academic performance will go down because ceiling effects limit the improvement of the proschool group.

red bedroom pictures create a red and black look that is sleek and dramatic with a high impact ceiling effect and sculptural lighting in this bedroom the designer went with an black white and red bedr.

There was no significant difference in attainment progress between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4 outcomes after two years between converter academies and similar non-academy schools in 2013, although ceiling effects could limit the extent to which differences between these higher performing schools can be observed.

Ceiling effects occur when a test is too easy.

As it continues up from the floor, it creates an elongating floor - meets - ceiling effect for an impressive finish.

«The new FDA - approved drug nusinersen may have a «ceiling effect,» in that it may not completely treat the disorder,» says Charlotte Sumner, M.D., associate professor of neurology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Current clinical measures are limited by floor and ceiling effects and lack sensitivity to change with time, especially in premanifest subjects who are likely to be the optimal candidates for therapeutic intervention.

There is a ceiling effect, not on individual children, but on the group as a whole because children who improve ultimately disappear from the category.

This prediction is reinforced by evidence of «ceiling effects» in standardized tests; students in the upper tracks, as described above, are likely to have higher scores and to hit the ceiling with little growth.

Second, students who do have a history of performing well on the tests may have little room for test - score growth; they may even hurt a teacher's score due to a «ceiling effect.»

This result can be ascribed to a ceiling effect in which the presurvey score was already high (4.21).

There are no floor or ceiling effects.

And teachers and advocates like Williams worry about «a ceiling effect,» in which teachers with high - achieving students receive low ratings because their students have less room for improvement.

An increased dose of (0.01 - 0.04 mg / kg IV) provide improved and longer lasting analgesia, not less.21 Buprenorphine was thought to have a ceiling effect, this is when a medication has reached its maximal response.

First, Democrats tended to endorse high belief (Ms = 5.94 on a 7 - point scale), raising the possibility of a ceiling effect.

It should be noted that this interaction might, to some extent, be attributable to a ceiling effect (i.e., there is relatively less upward adjustment potential in perceived scientific consensus for Democrats, although a significant gap in understanding persists even among Democrats).

Content validity also impacts on floor and ceiling effects and despite the AESOP questionnaire having content validity it was found to have a very strong ceiling effect.

This low reliability was likely because of a ceiling effect (M = 4.82 and 4.64 for Caucasians and Latinas, respectively).

Unlike other commonly - used measures of mental health, WEMWBS did not show a ceiling effect in either of the study populations, indicating that the measure may have potential for documenting overall improvements in population mental well - being.

However, there might have been a ceiling effect, since the average wellbeing and sensitivity score of the included children and caregivers was still quite high, compared to previous Dutch childcare studies (Groeneveld et al. 2010; Helmerhorst et al. 2014).

The somewhat weak additive benefits of high collaborative involvement from secondary caregivers could be due to ceiling effects that may have limited additional gains in certain outcomes, impeding detection of an additive effect.