Not exact matches
By the
way there is far more of this behavior occuring by married men than by
celibate priests in society.
But to affirm as Mr O'Donnell does that the
celibate «is more available and can give himself more to the service of the Lord and his people» (and that this is St Paul's understanding of the «higher vocation of the
celibate») is simply to recognise that the
celibate priest is freed to love the Lord and his people in a
way that is closest to Christ's own loving who «gave himself to the point of laying down his life and came «to serve and not to be served».
Those who know from within what marriage may demand are often unimpressed with the claim of the
celibate that his
way of life is renunciation for the service of the higher good, even when it is conceded to be innocent altogether of any unconscious homosexuality.
On the contrary, empirical studies have shown that the vast majority of gay people who have attempted a
celibate lifestyle end up acting out their sexual needs in promiscuous and self - destructive
ways.
I do kinda take issue though with straight people who think gay people should be
celibate (or I suppose someone who thinks their choice for celibacy is the only
way for everyone — but at least they actually know what they are asking of people).
However, to say that some people are born gay, with orientation rarely, if ever, being altered, and that these people are not often suited to celibacy the
way some are called, and yet they are forced to liev
celibate lives has deep theological implications.
One
way of getting at the point is by considering the
celibate man or woman whose specific vocation is not to act genitally but to redirect the sexual drive, desire, and equipment for other ends that are taken as good for that particular person.
In addition to listening to constructive criticism of the
way that «
celibate gay Christian» is open to misunderstanding, we also need to look critically at the
way that the language that has been used by Courage / Exodus / NARTH is also open to misunderstanding and has been used in misleading
ways.
We are not commanded to
celibate and we shared the same civil rights as the straights but unfortunately not in the
way that we want to but what the law and the norms dictate.
This is all about the bishops (a bunch of
celibate old men - «
celibate» if you don't count involvements with altar boys) trying to force other people's health decisions, and then blowing the thing
way out of proportion.
I am puzzled as to why Arman Partamian concludes that I blame all the problems of the postmodern world on the decline of
celibate vocations in the Catholic Church, when, at various points in my essay, I describe the influence as running the other
way.
If so, then
Celibate Passions has a
way for you to (potentially) earn some revenue.
The Terms & Conditions for use of any and all sites within the Passions Network, Inc. network of sites is as follows:
Celibate Passions is part of the Passions Network, Inc. («Passions Network») network of sites, and the service («Service») provided by this site, and all other sites within the «Passions Network» network of sites, is a
way for adults to meet each other online.
I thought this would be a interesting
way to meet other
celibate singles that are truly passionate about their celibacey before marriage...