Sentences with phrase «celled living organism»

«you can not teach Biology without evolution» - my prof. Personally, I love the idea that God could create life slowly out of a single celled living organism.
Heretofore, this earth has witnessed the emergence of single - celled living organisms, the growth of multicelled plant organisms, the advent of animals with centralized nervous systems making self - directed activity possible, and the flowering of humanity with its far - flung culture.
The differences between bacteria and viruses Author — Elaine Pendlebury BA BSc BVetMed DMS MRCVS Senior Veterinary Surgeon (Science & Welfare) PDSA Bacteria (singular is bacterium) are one celled living organisms [& hellip

Not exact matches

One of the most remarkable facts about the human body — indeed, about the great mass of living things — is that nearly every cell carries the complete genetic blueprint for the entire organism.
In reality, the lifeform belongs to a separate class of life known as Archaea, a type of single - celled organism that typically thrives in harsh environments.
Scientists can then grow the muscle cells and develop them in a lab the same way the cells would grow on a living organism.
It matches up with the observed entire life cycle and doubling rate (about every 8 hours) of the single celled organism.
The DNA programming required to create life capable of replicating in even the most simple single celled organism is far far more complex than anything mankind has ever built.
If the conditions to allow a cell to form and begin acting as a living organism were in place, it stands to reason that more than one would form, potentially a lot more.
If scienties found a single organism or cell on another planet they would proclaim WE HAVE FOUND LIFE.
i think your forgetting that if scientist found a single cell life form that that would be a living fully developed organism and a fetus is a multicellular organism and isn't fully developed yet
If there was a God who intelligently designed the universe and life then why would we have anything bigger than our solar system inhabited by single cell organisms?
To the contrary, it is more fantastic than we can imagine — hundreds of billions (trillions) of galaxies with hundreds of billions (trillions) of stars, nearly all of which have planets, some right for life; planets so hot that they rain glass; stars made of diamonds; the lineage of animals from singled celled organisms to the incredible variety that exists today with their unique adaptations.
The consensus on the evolution of primitive life is that simple life forms (prokaryotes, organisms whose cells lack a distinct nucleus) inhabited the Earth about 3 - 4 billion years ago, eukaryotic cells (those with a nucleus which contains the genetic material) emerging 2 - 3 billion years ago.
Scientists have created artificial life (simple single cell organisms) in the lab already.
I see living organisms emerge from single cells without something intelligent outside of them directing the process.
Scientific reductionism, however, wants to reduce biology to physics and chemistry, to explain the properties of «life», by thorough specification of the particulars (atoms and molecules) that are integrated into cells and organisms.
My mind is open to higher life... I think as an atheist, your mind is open as well, you have to believe in a higher evolved being than potentially our own, or you would not believe in a higher evolved being beyond a single cell organism...
When you say miracle of life, do you mean conception of a child in todays world or are you talking about single - celled organisms at the advent of life on earth?
DNA / RNA and proteins are by far the most important components of a living organism, carrying out virtually every function in a cell.
The derivative notion of «society» is essential to his metaphysics, for it serves to link his speculative conception of actual entities with entities of ordinary experience, such as material bodies and living organisms (including cells and molecules).
You make my point exactly, when you say that it takes no faith to believe that all life is decendant from a single celled organism through random chance.
Evolution's claim that all life descends from simple one - celled organisms is contradicted by every experiment to produce life from non-life.
Due to the time frames involved in spawning generation after generation of complex creatures, such experimentation is necessarily limited to specimens with short life spans / gestational periods like bacteria, single cell organisms and fruit flies.
The term «primordial soup» refers to the liquid in which the proteins and most basic enzymes could interact and eventually create the first cells, and the first living organisms.
Topher, all life on Earth evolved from single cell organisms you are just going to have to learn to deal with reality.
We anticipate some sort of growth toward increased complexity: increasingly larger organic macromolecules, then the convergence of many macromolecules to constitute a simple living system, either as a cell with its protective wall and vital nucleus or as some functional analogue, then the convergence of many cells to form larger organisms.
Individual cells within a complex organism, to be sure, apparently have a shorter life - span than their host.
(Cf. the phenomenon of the «runners» at first connected with the mother plant and then separated from it; the fluid transition between various plants and animals which appear to be one; the germ - cell inside and outside the parent organism, etc.) Living forms which present what are apparently very great differences in space and time can ontologically have the same morphological principle, so that enormous differences of external form can derive from the material substratum and chance patterns of circumstance without change of substantial form (caterpillar - chrysalis butterfly).
«What we have described as globalization is remarkably close to Teilhard de Chardin's planetization, in which «[mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, come [s] gradually to form round its earthly matrix, a single, major, organic unity, enclosed upon itself.4 Thus the globalization of humankind could lead to the formation of a new kind of living entity — a social organism — on the same cosmic principle as that by which atoms join to form molecules, molecules join to form mega-molecules, mega-molecules unite to form living cells, and innumerable cells constitute an organism.
We see Nature combining molecules and cells in the living body to construct separate individuals, and the same Nature, stubbornly pursuing the same course but on a higher level, combining individuals in social organisms to obtain a higher order of psychic results.
Birch and Cobb maintain that the ecological model is more adequate than the mechanical model for explaining DNA, the cell, other biological subject matter (as well as subatomic physics), because it holds that living things behave as they do only in interaction with other things which constitute their environment (LL 83) and because «the constituent elements of the structure at each level (of an organism) operate in patterns of interconnectedness which are not mechanical» (LL 83).
Stem cells can be obtained licitly, without loss of human life — for example, from an adult organism or from the blood of the umbilical cord at the time of birth.
May 28, 2013 — The widespread disappearance of stromatolites, the earliest visible manifestation of life on Earth, may have been driven by single - celled organisms called foraminifera.
RS: According to the hypothesis of formative causation, outlined in my book A New Science of Life, systems such as molecules, crystals, cells, organs and organisms are organized by specific morphogenetic fields, which give them their characteristic form and organization.
If, on the other hand, we define evolution in the Darwinian sense — as a process of random mutation and natural selection by which all living beings have arisen by chance from single - celled organisms over 100's of millions of years — we may not be on equally firm ground from a scientific perspective.
They owe their flimsy and precarious «existence» to the combinations of atoms, molecules and cells that make up living and thinking organisms.
And not just life — if life is understood to mean a biologically functioning organism, even a single cell is obviously alive — but personhood.
The organization of cells into complex living organisms may have taken millions of years to achieve.
This account of «life» as a characteristic of cells means that in the human organism there are billions of centers of life, not one.
Gradually organic chemicals were synthesized and eventually self - replicating complex molecules evolved, enabling the evolution of living cells, leading to multi - cellular organisms, plants and animals.
The fact that cells degenerate, that organisms decay, that our own lives ebb toward death, that civilizations eventually fall and that noble deeds and ideals fade into oblivion — all this makes us wonder how the universe could conceivably have any abiding seal of purpose.
And let's remember that evolution, while it's a theory, is a theory about the beginning and the transformation of life based on things we have observed, namely that cells change and mutate and that those mutations can produce cells that are unique and new, and that it would follow that it's possible for molecules to form into single - celled organisms which mutate and combine into multi-cellular organisms which mutate, adapt, and grow over time into new forms of life.
The Theory of Evolution only talks about how life evolved from the first single celled organism up till what we have today.
These foods contain trillions of healthy microbial organisms, live enzymes and L - glutamine which is the major amino acid that is needed to produce healthy intestinal cells.
Since the population of cells down there is small, most people thought they would just barely be able to eke out a living, that they were organisms with very few capabilities.
To help make ideas about energy more concrete, for example, the new unit will use a variety of analogies from more familiar physical systems (e.g., combustion and charging a cellphone battery) to help students understand those same energy - releasing and energy - requiring chemical reactions and energy transfer when they occur in living organisms (e.g., cellular respiration, creating a charge across a membrane in mitochondria and nerve cells) where the reactions are more complex and difficult to observe.
Starts with the first single - cell organisms and end with modern life forms.
The fields within biology are further divided based on the scale at which organisms are studied and the methods used to study them: biochemistry examines the fundamental chemistry of life; molecular biology studies the complex interactions of systems of biological molecules; cellular biology examines the basic building block of all life, the cell; physiology examines the physical and chemical functions of the tissues and organ systems of an organism; and ecology examines how various organisms interrelate.
Baylin says certain genes that control cell growth get turned down periodically during certain stages of life, including embryogenesis, when organisms are growing and developing rapidly.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z