Sentences with phrase «celled organisms in»

Bacterioplankton may be very abundant, numbering about 3.1 × 1028 single - celled organisms in the world ocean.

«Days» are millions or billions of years, and as the creatures of the planet enter the telling, they progress in a time - lapse sequence of evolution from one - celled organisms in the water to mammals crawling on dry land.

Even scientist tried to replicate to see if they can product a single - celled organism in a laboratory.

Not exact matches

In reality, the lifeform belongs to a separate class of life known as Archaea, a type of single - celled organism that typically thrives in harsh environmentIn reality, the lifeform belongs to a separate class of life known as Archaea, a type of single - celled organism that typically thrives in harsh environmentin harsh environments.

Such cells are found in organisms that can divide and differentiate into specialized cell types and can self - renew to produce more stem cells.

Scientists can then grow the muscle cells and develop them in a lab the same way the cells would grow on a living organism.

Essentially the model reproduces the inner workings of all of the proteins within the organism and allows scientists to see everything from how cells interact with each other to the functions of genes in a larger context that had not been previously understood.

The DNA programming required to create life capable of replicating in even the most simple single celled organism is far far more complex than anything mankind has ever built.

There is substantial evidence that one - celled organisms did in fact give rise to the modern world.

If the conditions to allow a cell to form and begin acting as a living organism were in place, it stands to reason that more than one would form, potentially a lot more.

in addition, there would need to be 2 single celled organisms to start it all: one plant and one animal.

(insert your own, southerners backwoods joke here) So Mendel fails, in my mind, to adequately account for the very narrow gene pool (read single - celled organism) that the theory of evolution begins with.

What is in contention is the «how» exactly we came from single - celled organisms, and there are many different theories on how that happened, but not IF that happened?

Matter spontaneously self - constructed miraculously to produce the first single - celled organism which by the way had to be complex at the very start in order to sustain itself AND reproduce?

... religious beliefs are just so bloody ridiculous... says a guy who thinks that a rock will turn into a single celled organism if it sits in warm salt water long enough...

No embryo has been generated, no organism «cloned» if ANT - OAR succeeds in its goal of producing nothing other than pluripotent stem cells.

Scientists have created artificial life (simple single cell organisms) in the lab already.

Furthermore, successful functioning of a cell, organism or brain is contingent upon the recurrence of the most basic physico - chemical processes in their adherence to the laws of nature.

My mind is open to higher life... I think as an atheist, your mind is open as well, you have to believe in a higher evolved being than potentially our own, or you would not believe in a higher evolved being beyond a single cell organism...

If he talks about the event character (1 / 10th of a second in length and all that) of the self, it is because he thinks that is what analysis of self - consciousness itself discloses and not because he means to construct the self out of subhuman individuals or organisms (Shalom's «event - cells»).

Molecules form cells, cells form organisms, and so on in turn.

Recombinant DNA research has been done primarily on bacteria, one - celled organisms smaller than animal or plant cells and simpler in structure, yet capable of very complex chemical activity.

All sexually reproducing organisms have pairs of chromosomes in all body cells (humans have 23 chromosome pairs), one chromosome of each pair inherited from the father and one from the mother.

In various experiments with various conditions, scientists have been able to create a wide range of cell - like structures of increasing complexity on the road toward a simple self - replicating organism.

We hold that those occasions responding to basic pulses or to the lure of a particular past particle form the elementary particles, which in turn form the atoms, which in turn form the molecules, which in turn form the more complex molecules of primitive organisms, which in turn form the one - celled organisms, which in turn form the multi-celled organisms, which, finally, in turn form the more complex organisms, persons.

When you say miracle of life, do you mean conception of a child in todays world or are you talking about single - celled organisms at the advent of life on earth?

Bible — you were born in the image of God therefore you have capacity to think, create, reason, feel compassion, sense of morality etc. — vs — evolution where you can attribute all those fine attributes to a rock (single celled organism) billions of years ago.

DNA / RNA and proteins are by far the most important components of a living organism, carrying out virtually every function in a cell.

Due to the time frames involved in spawning generation after generation of complex creatures, such experimentation is necessarily limited to specimens with short life spans / gestational periods like bacteria, single cell organisms and fruit flies.

The cell theory of organisms was a change in principle, not merely in degree, compared to all ancient thought.

We can see it at play in MRSA and many single celled organisms — but Christians deny it because it makes us PART of the environment rather than having dominion OVER it.

The term «primordial soup» refers to the liquid in which the proteins and most basic enzymes could interact and eventually create the first cells, and the first living organisms.

The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing societies within which there are social levels that can be identified with cells, others which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to as the regnant nexus, a social thread of complex temporal inheritance which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the organism as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.

(Cf. the phenomenon of the «runners» at first connected with the mother plant and then separated from it; the fluid transition between various plants and animals which appear to be one; the germ - cell inside and outside the parent organism, etc.) Living forms which present what are apparently very great differences in space and time can ontologically have the same morphological principle, so that enormous differences of external form can derive from the material substratum and chance patterns of circumstance without change of substantial form (caterpillar - chrysalis butterfly).

Thus animals for the most part have little or no social organization, and in this respect may be likened to single - celled organisms.

Dennis has a PhD in genetics / developmental biology from the University of British Columbia and a special interest in studying pattern formation and cell - cell communication during tissue development using fruit flies as a model organism.

«What we have described as globalization is remarkably close to Teilhard de Chardin's planetization, in which «[mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, come [s] gradually to form round its earthly matrix, a single, major, organic unity, enclosed upon itself.4 Thus the globalization of humankind could lead to the formation of a new kind of living entity — a social organism — on the same cosmic principle as that by which atoms join to form molecules, molecules join to form mega-molecules, mega-molecules unite to form living cells, and innumerable cells constitute an organism.

The second question has in fact two facets: (a) how does it arise in the development of the individual organism during the process of growth from the moment of fertilization of the egg; and (b) how does the egg itself come to get that way — that is to say, how can we conceive of evolution as having «designed» the cell?

We see Nature combining molecules and cells in the living body to construct separate individuals, and the same Nature, stubbornly pursuing the same course but on a higher level, combining individuals in social organisms to obtain a higher order of psychic results.

Birch and Cobb maintain that the ecological model is more adequate than the mechanical model for explaining DNA, the cell, other biological subject matter (as well as subatomic physics), because it holds that living things behave as they do only in interaction with other things which constitute their environment (LL 83) and because «the constituent elements of the structure at each level (of an organism) operate in patterns of interconnectedness which are not mechanical» (LL 83).

The informational component in a cell, organism, or computer has to be constrained if it is to be informative.

RS: According to the hypothesis of formative causation, outlined in my book A New Science of Life, systems such as molecules, crystals, cells, organs and organisms are organized by specific morphogenetic fields, which give them their characteristic form and organization.

That means also that the cell as cell interacts with other cells in the larger organism.

Called absentminded, they are in fact present - minded, because they do this in order to be present with some particular point of the world — to love it and know it — the artist and lover with a particular face, for instance, the scientist with a particular cell or organism.

DARWIN»S TREE CHOPPED DOWN In recent years, scientists have been able to compare the genetic codes of dozens of different single - celled organisms as well as those of plants and animals.

If, on the other hand, we define evolution in the Darwinian sense — as a process of random mutation and natural selection by which all living beings have arisen by chance from single - celled organisms over 100's of millions of years — we may not be on equally firm ground from a scientific perspective.

Under Child's theory there is complete continuity from the reaction of the cell with its environment, which constitutes the primary metabolic gradient, and from the later reactions, by which the pattern of the developing embryo is laid down in accordance with the changing gradient pattern, to the intellectual processes by which the adult organism adjusts its relations to the outside world.

It may be thought of as a supermolecule composed principally of C, H, O, N, P and S. Multicellular organisms, including man, are in turn not mere aggregations of cells, but so tightly organized that they may be considered super-super-molecules, ultimately with properties which are wholly those of the component atoms in the very complex combination.

«God includes the world, but is more than the world.20 Hartshorne is willing to say that «the world is in a sense the body of God».21 We are cells in the divine organism.

The high - grade organisms we study in biological evolution contain many subordinate enduring objects; molecules and cells, for example, comprise the environment for atoms and electrons in our bodies.