Sentences with phrase «cells living on»

Every tooth has millions of bacterial cells living on it.

With Moms cells and baby's cells living on in each other, it means that for better or worse, they carry all that they are forward into their lives and pass on the characteristics of each other to successive generations.

Co-authored by David Catling, an atmospheric chemist at the University of Washington in Seattle, the study peers deep into our planet's history to devise a novel recipe for finding single - celled life on faraway worlds in the not - too - distant future.

Her cells live on in animals infected with DFTD today.

Anyway, my family was recently dignos with cancer and I heard keto diet is good for cancer patient since cancer cell live on sugar ame by elimate sugar intake it can starve the cancer cell.

Not exact matches

A greater portion of adults living in poverty (66 %) and near poverty (59 %) were relying solely on cell phone service, the CDC said.

My cell does not work where her parents live, so I had to drive 20 minutes and stand outside the library in this little village to sync my email and see what was going on.

«On my phone, the application ranked contacts in Colorado, Michigan, and New Mexico at the top; at the bottom was a friend whose cell phone has a Texas number, though she actually lives in California.»

Organovo, a startup in San Diego, has already gone public with a market capitalization of half a billion dollars on the strength of its method for printing living cells.

Scientists can then grow the muscle cells and develop them in a lab the same way the cells would grow on a living organism.

Although it's unclear whether the phone will live up to Jobs's lofty promise, a quick look at the specs on Apple's website makes me look askance at my brand new BlackBerry Pearl (and every other cell phone, for that matter).

• «I was an early RS consumer having spent paperboy delivery money on countless «free» baseball bat sized d - cell flashlights, the mystical p - boxes and subsequently, Band - Aids (early life lesson on how hot a solder iron can get...) to returning later as a college co-op student to the Fort Worth, TX headquarters.

This includes 400 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 403 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone.

We do this by growing healthy marine - animal cells on their own, instead of live fish.

I was inspired by the vulnerability of that culture; the way people spill their life out over their cell phones while you're sitting next to them on the subway.

Chuckles «Look around chad, we exist, a single cell appeared on this planet and evolved into all forms of life we know today.

Look around chad, we exist, a single cell appeared on this planet and evolved into all forms of life we know today.

If scienties found a single organism or cell on another planet they would proclaim WE HAVE FOUND LIFE.

The data encoded on the DNA inside every cell of every living thing is a kind of written language.

On the contrary, given the presumption of a collective agency for the cell as a unified field of activity, it makes excellent sense to account for the stability of the field in terms of societies of inanimate actual occasions with their ongoing transmission of fixed patterns and for the vitality of the field in terms of the nexus of living occasions with their higher degree of novelty and originality.

@Rachel, Many Atheists are simply trying to counter-act the influence of Christians in their lives, such as science in science class, gay marriage, stem cell research, women's choices on reproduction.

Commenting on Whitehead's doctrine of structured societies at the cellular level, John Cobb remarks: «Whitehead at that point was forced to explain the order in the cell in terms of its molecular structure, to which spontaneity was denied, and to explain the life of the cell in terms of the events in its empty space, which he depicted as radically unordered.

The consensus on the evolution of primitive life is that simple life forms (prokaryotes, organisms whose cells lack a distinct nucleus) inhabited the Earth about 3 - 4 billion years ago, eukaryotic cells (those with a nucleus which contains the genetic material) emerging 2 - 3 billion years ago.

If there is no God and there is no creation where did the first living cells come from to give life on earth.

I mean, if god wants him to live he wouldn't have given him cancer in the first place but lets just say he contr.acted can.cer on his own but was called upon god to do these good dee.ds but needed more time, now what if the only way he could survi.ve was from stem cell res.earch?

Life - at - conception and clump - of - cells alike are left behind; the woman «gets to», because she has to, decide «for herself» whether or not the embryo she has conceived is a living person, based on a data set officially deemed indeterminate.

What I said was to remove all encroachment on other's lives by religion, e.g. science class creationism, bans on stem cell research, etc..

But I think that to go on to create life without intervening (ie place the right chemicals within lipid bubbles to create cells) may require a ton of random chance, and could take a lab the size of the ocean, and about a half a billion years to work.

Until someone can create a single bit of matter and a single living cell, out of nothing, the onus / burden of proof is on atheists!

When you say miracle of life, do you mean conception of a child in todays world or are you talking about single - celled organisms at the advent of life on earth?

The sun is not perfectly positioned upon the earth by accident it was placed there for a reason and purpose to support life which is God attended... We are not on this planet on accident we did not evolve from a single cell that theory has been debunked for many years...

Only 10 % of the cells in and on your body are human, the other 90 % is the trillions of life forms that inhabit and live on your body... some of them can kill you if they get too numerous.

How life first began is irrelevant, the first cell could have been placed by your god, and evolutionary biology, that is, the explanation for the diversity of life on earth, would be unchanged.

As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.

Though an attentive observer of the life issues on many fronts, including the debate about stem cells, I was not aware that the debate was over until I read the article.

Topher, all life on Earth evolved from single cell organisms you are just going to have to learn to deal with reality.

And finally, John is left all alone, wondering if his life is a waste, if he has proclaimed a false Messiah, and one night, as he is trying to get comfortable on the dirty ground of his prison cell, two soldiers come and chop his head off.

Without that context, there is the danger that the family and its like will become so focused on itself, so inward - looking, that it becomes a cell of unhealthy life, not of healthy and developing life.

Well it seems like Ivan can relax, Michael Peroski has just solved all of our problems: Proceeding from ideology - driven inquiry entails starting from an answer: «Research on human embryonic stem cell should be forbidden because embryos are equivalent to human lives» and working....

The whole burden of Whitehead's case must fall on the fact of inheritance, for as he himself fully recognized in discussing the cell, commonness of character is not the distinctive mark of life.

No doubt it is true, scientifically speaking, that no distinct center of superhuman consciousness has yet appeared on earth (at least in the living world) for which it may be claimed or predicted that one day it will exercise a centralizing function, in relation to associated human thought, similar to the role of the individual «I» in relation to the cells of the brain.

«What we have described as globalization is remarkably close to Teilhard de Chardin's planetization, in which «[mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, come [s] gradually to form round its earthly matrix, a single, major, organic unity, enclosed upon itself.4 Thus the globalization of humankind could lead to the formation of a new kind of living entity — a social organism — on the same cosmic principle as that by which atoms join to form molecules, molecules join to form mega-molecules, mega-molecules unite to form living cells, and innumerable cells constitute an organism.

We see Nature combining molecules and cells in the living body to construct separate individuals, and the same Nature, stubbornly pursuing the same course but on a higher level, combining individuals in social organisms to obtain a higher order of psychic results.

There would, in other words, be no difference in principle (but only in complexity) between living cells and living animals, on the one hand, and rocks and billiard balls, on the other.

In this sense an atom is more complex than an electron, a molecule more complex than an atom, and a living cell more complex than the highest chemical nuclei of which it is composed, the difference depending (on this I insist) not only on the number and diversity of the elements included in each case, but at least as much on the number and correlative variety of the links formed between these elements.

First the vitalization of matter, associated with the grouping of molecules; then the hominization of Life, associated with a super-grouping of cells; and finally the planetization of Mankind, associated with a closed grouping of people: Mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, coming gradually to form around its earthly matrix a single, major organic unity, enclosed upon itself; a single, hyper - complex, hyper - centrated, hyperconscious arch-molecule, co-extensive with the heavenly body on which it was born.

He explains, «My T cell level is at an all - time high giving me a zero per cent chance of passing on the virus... miracles have been persistent in my life, therefore faith has been persistent in my life.»

May 28, 2013 — The widespread disappearance of stromatolites, the earliest visible manifestation of life on Earth, may have been driven by single - celled organisms called foraminifera.

Imagine ourselves back some four billion years ago on this planet facing two scenarios: on one side, a vast turbulence, terrific volcanoes belching forth from the inexhaustible fires of the earth's core; on the other side the beginnings of living cells, microscopic, invisible along the water's edge of some shallow sea, quiet, vital.

If, on the other hand, we define evolution in the Darwinian sense — as a process of random mutation and natural selection by which all living beings have arisen by chance from single - celled organisms over 100's of millions of years — we may not be on equally firm ground from a scientific perspective.