His overall conclusion was that «person -
centered teachers score high in multiple areas of student achievement.»
Not exact matches
A longitudinal study by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development concluded in 2007 that «although parenting was a stronger and more consistent predictor of children's development than early child ‐ care experience, higher quality care predicted higher vocabulary
scores and more exposure to
center care predicted more
teacher ‐ reported externalizing problems.
In a case the NY Times said would «propel New York City to the
center of a national debate about how student test
scores should be used to evaluate
teachers,» a bunch of lawyers fought it out in a NYC courtroom yesterday.
Or were less costly components of the
teachers» National Board
scores, such as the one - day assessment at a Sylvan Learning
Center, just as effective as the costly, time - consuming (and coaching - or cheating - prone) portfolio in predicting student performance?
But it is precisely the focus on
teacher evaluation — and whether it is connected to student test
scores — that is at the
center of the most hotly contested education policy debates.
For each six - hour day
teachers in the 130,000 - student Duval County district, which includes Jacksonville, took part in the program offered by the Schultz
Center for Teaching and Leadership, student
scores on state tests rose by half a point.
A study by researchers at the National
Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt finds that
teachers who were offered rewards of up to $ 15,000 if their students met goals for test -
score gains did not outperform
teachers who were not offered the bonuses.
To meet district initiatives of improving critical literacy skills and raising ELA assessment
scores, the
Teacher Center of Central Westchester partnered with The Performing Arts
Center at Purchase College, SUNY (Kennedy
Center for the Arts Partnership) to provide a literacy program, entitled Neighborhood Bridges.
Beyond PD:
Teacher Professional Learning in High - Performing Systems: Report from the
Center on International Education Benchmarking considers professional learning policies and practice in Shanghai, British Columbia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, where students consistently
score well on PISA assessments, finding that their professional learning is a part of daily life http://www.ncee.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/BeyondPDWeb.pdf
Providing
teachers with tools for ensuring task validity along with expert task reviews and engaging educators in cross-district sessions on
scoring student work are two ways of addressing technical quality within a more student -
centered accountability system.
By contrast, Early Head Start
teachers do not even have to have a bachelor's degree, and the standards for caregivers at
scores of unaffiliated day care
centers across the country are typically low — with just a high school diploma and some short training courses considered sufficient.
And a new study from the National
Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University — although not studying the important question of whether
teachers who receive high
scores on TAP evaluations tend to produce greater gains in their students» test
scores — found that a small sample of secondary schools using TAP produced no higher levels of student achievement than schools that hadn't implemented the TAP program.
The
Center has worked with
scores of schools and hundreds of
teachers to identify the factors that affect meaningful use of technology in the classroom.
Last year, the
Center for Education Innovation created easy - to - read «education scorecards» for every school district in the state so that parents — many lacking high levels of literacy or regular access to the Internet — would have clear information about test
scores, graduation rates and
teachers.
During middle school, for example, students from elementary schools that had implemented the Developmental Studies
Center's Child Development Project — a program that emphasizes community building — were found to outperform middle school students from comparison elementary schools on academic outcomes (higher grade - point averages and achievement test
scores),
teacher ratings of behavior (better academic engagement, respectful behavior, and social skills), and self - reported misbehavior (less misconduct in school and fewer delinquent acts)(Battistich, 2001).
«The lack of meaningful correlation between average
teacher compensation and school performance, as measured by the district's 2013 API
score, is stunning» said Mark Bucher, president of the California Policy
Center.
The studies, both by the Community College Research
Center at
Teachers College, Columbia University, found that as many as a third of students sidetracked into remedial classes because of their
scores on standardized tests would have earned a B or better if they had simply proceeded directly to college - level courses.
Dean Benbow: Our National
Center on Performance Incentives conducted a three - year scientific experiment in Nashville in which we paid
teachers substantial bonuses based on student test
scores.
«It's undeniable that the push for more testing shined light on things we didn't know before,» said Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the National
Center on
Teacher Quality, an advocacy group that presses to use student test scores as one key metric for evaluating teacher perfo
Teacher Quality, an advocacy group that presses to use student test
scores as one key metric for evaluating
teacher perfo
teacher performance.
The lawsuit
centered on the system's use of value - added modeling (VAM), a controversial statistical method aimed at isolating a
teacher's effectiveness based on their students» standardized test
scores.
As the benchmark for quality, the program uses The Classroom Assessment
Scoring System (CLASS), which
centers on the processes that take place in classrooms: student -
teacher interactions (academic and social), relationships and the implementation of the curriculum.
Much of the discussion about the use of student standardized test
scores to evaluate
teachers has
centered on how unfair the «value - added» method is to
teachers because it is unreliable and can — and does — label effective
teachers as ineffective too often.
Last week the
Center for Retirement Research released a research brief looking at whether
teacher salaries and
teacher pensions affect the quality of new
teacher hires, measured by SAT
scores.
These items favor — with higher self - assessment item
scores — «student -
centered» over «
teacher -
centered,» or even «
teacher - directed» or «
teacher - facilitated» approaches, and technology as an agent of educational reform, as demonstrated by the possible responses listed under Item 14 («Students employ digital content to enhance learning»):
Based on these
scores,
teachers can see if the TRM aligns with the EAM and how they may close the gap to assist in moving toward the
center of the TPACK triangle.
In a recent report from the
Center for American Progress, they revisit their argument that
teachers should be actively involved in the design,
scoring, and analysis of performance assessments.
In analyzing these results, as well as other survey data, the nonprofit
Center for American Progress (CAP) determined that
teachers are more likely to support programs that rely on a variety of measures of
teacher performance, rather than those that rely on only one measure (such as test
scores).
Some of the liveliest exchanges
centered on plans to factor student performance, including test
scores, into a
teacher's evaluation, which has been the most controversial part of the law.
The Value - Added Research
Center at UW - Madison has developed methods that are being used to grade
teachers» success, in part, on student test
scores.
«That test
scores help you get more education, and that more education has an earnings effect — that makes sense to a lot of people,» said Robert H. Meyer, director of the Value - Added Research
Center at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, which studies
teacher measurement but was not involved in this study.
In spite of the many millions of dollars poured into expounding the theory of paying
teachers for higher student test
scores (sometimes mislabeled as «merit pay»), a new study by Vanderbilt University's National
Center on Performance Incentives found that the use of merit pay for
teachers in the Nashville school district produced no difference even according to their measure, test outcomes for students.
Work with schools to be sure they report
teacher - pupil ratios and test
scores accurately to the National
Center for Education Statistics.