Sentences with phrase «centigrade so»

Not exact matches

I am in the US so am wondering if the frying temp is Farenheit or Centigrade?

That's because it takes so much heat to build a layer of silicon memory — about 1,000 degrees centigrade — that any attempt to do so would melt the logic below.

Temperatures at the start of the decade were about 10.5 degrees centigrade — high but not remarkably so.

In previous times I have tested the temperature of the oven - so I know it is accurate - measured in Centigrade / Celsius.

Because silicon technology is created using temperatures up to 300 degrees Centigrade — a temperature that melts plastics — these screens have, so far, been limited to glass.

Fiji lies south of the equator so our August arrival was in the midst of the «cool» season, meaning that sunshine temperatures varied between the mid seventies to low eighties Fahrenheit (24 - 28 degrees centigrade).

0.2 degrees centigrade per decade requires 300 years to reach 6 degrees centigrade, so they aren't interested.

So if we continue on our present course, climate change will probably take on a life of its own, spiral out of control and according to a recent paper, by 2300 we could see a temperature rise of 12 degrees centigrade.

So Websters specifically disagrees with your claim that «centigrade» means ANY scale going from zero to 100.

So the global mean increase for this period, or now, compared to this period is half a degree centigrade.

What makes cobalt so valuable is its high melting point (1,494 degrees centigrade) which makes it a perfect material for making superalloy metals for use in everything from turbine blades to prosthetics.

The fact that you don't see the kind of embarassment about the ridiculous surface record that you should from the fact the 70 % of the sites are so poorly chosen you'd expect at least 2 centigrade degrees of error (and the whole claimed effect is only a fraction of a degree), shows how corrupt and disinterested in truth the public discourse is.

And so to take issue with any aspect of the debate is to seemingly deny that the earth has warmed approximately 0.7 degrees centigrade and that humans had some part in it.

The CET data for the period indicate a distinct climate shift of some 0.35 degrees centigrade on a 50 year basis, but rather more on a decadal basis, so that well documented era can usefully be our benchmark for temperature comparisons, whilst demonstrating the usefulness of a decadal time scale in determining a change in the climate that is «noticeable» and has an impact on humans and nature.

But they have not been doing so at a rate consistent with keeping cumulative carbon emissions low enough to reliably stay below the international target of less than 2 degrees Centigrade of global warming.

If each one caused a half centigrade degree decrease in global warming we could be 15 degrees cooler [hyperbole as you like it so much]