Thus the gospel was concentrated in the person of Jesus; the hope of the Kingdom receded and became eventually only another name for «heaven,» the other world, the state of bliss beyond death, or, as in Thomas Aquinas, a term for the divine theodicy in general — though in truth this interpretation really emphasized a fundamental element in the whole
biblical conception, in Jesus» teaching as elsewhere — and thus an intellectual concept of the person of Jesus tended to become
central for Christian
doctrine, theology, and devotion, rather than the person of God, his sovereignty and his redemptive will, his wisdom and his love.
As one might expect, however, Barr is at his best when he returns again and again to his
central theme — a critique of the style of
biblical interpretation that follows from the fundamentalist commitment to a
doctrine of the «inerrancy of Scripture.»
Surely there are
Biblical statements concerning God's greatness that, interpreted within the frame of reference of Greek philosophy, might suggest such an ontology, which might then yield the highly speculative Trinitarian
doctrine central to Mouw's orthodoxy.