It's concentrated
centralized generation of power and concentrated distribution — with no justice in distribution.
Not exact matches
The energy landscape is changing from
centralized, large - scale
power generation to a network
of often independently owned and operated
power producers.
Off - grid solar is already providing electricity to communities in rural Africa, India, the Caribbean and elsewhere who will never get access to grid
power from nuclear or any other form
of large,
centralized generation, because the resources to build either the grids or the giant
power plants do not exist, nor do those communities have the wealth to purchase grid
power.
By doing so, it helps maintain the state's status quo
of having below average grid interconnection rules and incentivizing
centralized, fossil fuel - based
power generation over renewable sources.
In countries such as Kenya, whose economies are growing faster than either conventional,
centralized electricity
generation or
power grids, the potential
of microgrids to electrify powerless communities is huge.
Generation dispatch decisions are made by an individual utility operating multiple plants in its service area or by a Regional Transmission Organization as part
of a
centralized wholesale
power market.
Furthermore, environmental and security concerns have sparked increased interest in small - scale, «distributed» sources
of renewable electricity
generation like rooftop solar panels, to reduce our reliance on large,
centralized power plants.
The term distributed
generation distinguishes these systems from the large,
centralized power plants that provide the vast majority
of the nation's
power.
Those arguing for «going along» with the EPA SRPP do not seem to realize that if they do, even stricter regulations will follow the SRPP if and when the principle
of centralized EPA control
of power generation and use has been established.
Evan Halper's December 2 article in the Los Angeles Times, «
Power Struggle: Green energy versus a grid that's not ready» perpetuates the false narrative that renewable energy increases the risk
of blackouts, when in fact the problem is
centralized fossil fuel nonrenewable
generation.
«The dominance
of a single energy source and
centralized power generation are highly susceptible to disruption, failure and even sabotage with severe consequences economically and socially, as articulated clearly and convincingly by Lovins and Lovins, 1982 and Lovins and...» (Diversification and localization
of energy systems for sustainable development and energy security X Li — Energy Policy, 2005 — Elsevier)(Cited by 74)
PDF) entitled «Disruptive Challenges» in January 2013, outlining the threat that distributed energy
generation presents to the traditional utility industry business model
of selling electricity from large,
centralized, mostly fossil fuel
power plants.
The grid
of the future will be characterized by two — way information flow, two - way
power flow,
centralized and distributed
generation as well increasing use
of energy efficiency and demand response measures.