Not exact matches
(Exodus 3:13 - 14) In consonance with this traditional attitude, the Jews, from reverential motives, substituted adonai, meaning «lord,» for the sacred name in their
reading of the
Scriptures; as a consequence, in the thirteenth
century Christian Hebraists mistakenly used the consonants
of the name jhwh with the Hebrew vowels
of adonai, thus getting Jehovah; but behind this later mystification lay in primitive times the recognized unwillingness
of any god to surrender possession
of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over him.
Many evangelicals are beginning to grasp the fact, that certain ways
of reading the
Scriptures and certain doctrines about the
Scriptures may actually become the means
of oppression
of modern women by the imposition
of first
century social patterns.
Centuries ago, it was known that no
reading of Scripture could be interpreted in one way... if you're talking about the Christian faith, which is already so one - sided, nowadays...
We
read in 21st
Century Science and Health with Key to the
Scriptures, «If hypnotism seems to heal disease — or mental collective noise seems to alleviate loneliness — this appearance is deceptive, since error can not remove the effects
of error.
At the very moment at the end
of the nineteenth
century that the universities were consolidating the triumph
of objectivism, many
of the religious were claiming that religion meant dogmatism based upon a peculiar
reading of the
Scriptures (Genesis as a geology text.
Jesus, like other first -
century Jews,
read his Bible creatively, seeking deeper meaning that transcended the boundaries
of the words
of Scripture.
Such learning begins with prayer and the
Scriptures, it unfolds with pondering the vast riches
of the
centuries of study that have gone before us, it deepens in thought and contemplation, it enlarges the mind with much
reading and listening and questioning.
However by the Reformation in the 16th
century, Martin Luther not only translated the Gospels, but he interpreted them in printed sermons as well, and when John Calvin, Roger Williams and others broadly disagreed in print with Luther on such matters as what the
scriptures said about the role
of government in society, the whole matter
of scriptural interpretation was opened to thousands
of individuals who for the first time could
read (or have
read to them) the published documents.
Certain it is that the writers
of the books had no idea at the time
of writing that they were producing
scriptures that would be
read for
centuries and come to be regarded as the very word
of God in every respect.