In fact, I am more intolerant of those who from some limited 19th
century view of science preclude the supernatural than I am of those who say that on the basis of their experience in the Christian community they affirm the miraculous.
Not exact matches
If Christianity is to show the relevance
of its doctrine
of love to contemporary man it must make clear that in sex as in
science the Christian
view of the world is not confined to first
century concepts.
Because Troeltsch, at the beginning
of this
century, was keenly aware
of many trends that became apparent to most observers only at its end: the collapse
of Eurocentrism; the perceived relativity
of all historical events and knowledge (including scientific knowledge); an awareness that Christianity is relative to its Western, largely European history and environment; the emergence
of a profound global pluralism; the central role
of practice in theology; the growing impact
of the social
sciences on our
view of the world and
of ourselves; and dramatic changes in the role
of religious institutions and religious thought.
Some
of you may be thinking that my
view of creaturely freedom contradicts the causal determinism that has dominated modern
science for several
centuries.
For Whitehead, during this time
of transition between the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries, abstraction is foremost a tool
of science, and Universal Algebra takes this
view to the limit.
Whitehead believed this
view of reality is consistent with the new developments in 20th -
century science.
But he fails even to allude to the radical challenges to this which emerged in the 20th
century from some Pragmatists and from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with their «collapse
of the fact - value system», a
view now prominent in contemporary philosophy
of science.
But he never asks what social, economic, political and ideological forces were at work in the creation
of the modern scientific world
view, any more than he looks at the role
of those forces in the eighteenth
century celebration
of it, the romantic reaction against it, or the nineteenth and twentieth
century codification
of positive
science.
The liberal theology has never yet been given sufficient credit for having taken the new
science — the new world
view of the nineteenth
century, the conception
of growth and evolving life — and trying to reconceive the nature
of God so as to make His relation to such a world intelligible.
Obama's
view is not merely a oversimplification
of the relation between
science and politics, and consequently
of science's «proper place», but a willful ignorance
of the lessons regarding the dangers
of a
science divorced from prudence the twentieth
century has provided.
But in
view of the power and tenacity
of the scientistic ideology, which abhors the very idea
of myth, it is not surprising that Whitehead has received so little attention from philosophers
of science, despite his being one
of the most original and creative thinkers
of this
century.
The basic institutional pattern
of modern societies was laid down, in his
view, between the sixteenth and eighteenth
centuries with the emergence
of a relatively autonomous political system which was accompanied by increasingly autonomous systems in other realms as well, such as
science, law, education, and art.
This is chiefly because in the latter part
of the twentieth
century, and led by liberation theologians, we have come to
view science sociologically.
But in the twentieth
century, the main influences
of science on religion have come less from specific theories — such as quantum physics, relativity, astronomy, or molecular biology — than from
views of science as a method.
Furthermore, the pre-modern
science concept
of «the nature» has been slipping out
of our culture's world -
view for
centuries, given the force
of new knowledge about formality.
This
view of the universe was successfully challenged and overthrown in the sixteenth
century by two Christian scholars, who may be rightly regarded as laying the foundations
of the modern
science of astronomy.
In
science news around the world, NASA's Cassini mission is about to take its final plunge into the atmosphere
of Saturn after 13 years providing an unprecedented
view of the planet and its moons, a fight over whether to preserve or develop
of one Europe's oldest gold mining sites heats up again, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves the first cancer gene therapy for people, a U.S. court gives a green light to a $ 1 billion lawsuit brought by the Guatemalan victims and survivors
of mid — 20th
century syphilis experiments by research institutions including Johns Hopkins University, and more.
Unfortunately, he does so mainly by criticizing the
views of three straw men: Adam Smith, the 18th -
century author
of The Wealth
of Nations, and 20th -
century thinkers Frederick Taylor, the inventor
of management
science, and B. F. Skinner, a pioneer
of behavioral psychology.
LEAKEYS DENY, Roger Lewin, Ed., Research News,
Science, Richard and his parents, Louis and Mary, have held to a
view of human origins for nearly half a
century now that the line
of true man, the line
of Homo - large brain, toolmaking and so on - has a separate ancestry that goes back millions and millions
of years.
The eleven artists juxtapose divergent approaches in conversation with each other, reflecting on primal questions consuming artists over the millennia: Elliot Arkin's conceptual use
of web - based commerce spins an absurdist
view on the commodification
of artists; Babette Bloch's stainless steel reassessments
of nature and artistic precedent limn positives and negatives through light; Christopher Carroll Calkins's street photography captures moments
of under - the - radar narratives; Valentina DuBasky's acrylic and marble dust works on paper and plaster are a contemporary comment on the prehistory
of art; Gabriel Ferrer's performance - like in - the - moment sumi - ink drawings on handmade paper reflect on memory and personal narrative; Christopher Gallego's realist, pure light - filled oil painting elevates the ordinariness
of an artist's space to visual poetry; Ana Golici, in pergamano and collage, takes inspiration from 17th
Century female naturalist, entomologist and botanical illustrator Maria Sibylla Merian to explore questions
of science, nature and objective truth; Emilie Lemakis's monumental amplification
of an ancient Greek krater employs scale to upend perceptions for the viewer's reconsideration; Mark Mellon's bronzes address the oppositions
of movement and stillness; the alchemy
of Michael Townsend's uncontrolled poured acrylic paintings equate the properties
of materials with the turbulence
of the universe; Jessica Daryl Winer's engagement with luminous color and choreographic line reflects in visual resonance the sonic history
of a musical instrument.
Is the climate
science community backing away from earlier
views of solar forcing in the early 20th
century?
The British medical journal The Lancet, known for its tobacco Prohibitionist and anti-Israel
views, created a commission on Health and Climate Change to promote, as if it were
science, the
view that «to avoid the risk
of potentially catastrophic climate change impacts requires total anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to be kept below 2900 billion tonnes by the end
of the
century» — not a calculation that physicians, biologists, and the like are particularly qualified to make.)
A dispassionate
view of eugenics, ecology, and environmentalism over the last
century reveals less serious
science and more angry religion full
of pagan deities.
In a memo to the Vice President s office, Mr. Cooney explained: We plan to begin to refer to this study in Administration communications on the
science of global climate change because it contradicts a dogmatic
view held by many in the climate
science community that the past
century was the warmest in the past millennium and signals
of human induced global warming.
-LSB-...]
of anthropogenic global warming, Michelle Malkin: The global warming scandal
of the
century, Sister Toldjah: Global warming alarmists exposed, The Other McCain: Lies damned lies, and climate change, Riehl World
View: Climate
science fraud -LSB-...]