Indiana Trial Rule 403 goes on to state in part that even relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by
certain dangers of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues or misleading the jury.
In US v. Mitchell, No. 09 - 3041, the court
of appeals affirmed defendant's conviction for money laundering conspiracy, holding that 1) the indictment was not so defective that defendant could not have reasonably understood the offense for which he was charged; and 2) defendant did not show that the
danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighed the probative value
of certain tax information.