Certain federal district courts (particularly Virginia Eastern, California Central, and Pennsylvania Eastern) continue to be more favorable to patent holders, with shorter time - to - trial, higher success rates, and higher median damages awards.
Not exact matches
The class action, filed in United States
District Court, Southern
District of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the
federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and
certain of its top officials.
The class action, filed in United States
District Court, for the
District of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations of the
federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and
certain of its top officials.
Art. 3116, however, limits the sum that may be charged candidates for
certain posts, such as the offices of
district judge, judge of the
Court of Civil Appeals, and senator and representative in the state and
federal legislatures, and for some counties fees are fixed by Arts. 3116a - 3116d, 1939 Supp., and 3116e, 3116f, 1942 Supp.
From the tidbits of information gleaned at a hearing on Thursday in
Federal District Court in Manhattan, it appeared that prosecutors had argued last fall — in a closed hearing and in sealed court papers — to be able to use certain evidence against Mr. Silver at t
Court in Manhattan, it appeared that prosecutors had argued last fall — in a closed hearing and in sealed
court papers — to be able to use certain evidence against Mr. Silver at t
court papers — to be able to use
certain evidence against Mr. Silver at trial.
The
Federal Pro Bono Program is a program in the
District of Nevada which allows the
court to appoint pro bono (unpaid) counsel for unrepresented, income - eligible litigants in
certain civil cases.
Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's claims against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of
certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the
federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).
The Supreme
Court may review
certain categories of judgments, decisions, and questions of law certified to it by the
district courts of appeal and
federal appellate
courts.
The
federal district court in Las Vegas erred in granting summary judgment to patent infringement defendant DigiDeal as to
certain cancelled claims (upon reexamination by the USPTO) of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,935 because suits based upon cancelled claims must be dismissed for
Served as lead counsel for the defendant in putative multi-state consumer class action filed in the US
District Court for the
District of New Jersey alleging that
certain refrigerator models distributed by the defendant were falsely designated as compliant with
federal ENERGY STAR program.
Although it is hard to be
certain without more publicly available information, FISC judges likely treat their opinions as non-precedential, as is standard practice for
federal district courts.19 The relatively few public FISC opinions do cite earlier FISC opinions and principles of law, 20 but we have seen no clear evidence to suggest that the judges feel formally bound by those earlier opinions in any manner that would set them apart from other Article III
district courts.
The
Federal Circuit
court ruled in Oracle's appeal that
certain declarative code and the structure, sequence and organization of the Java APIs are entitled to copyright protection and remanded the case back to the
district court.
In the March 2017 Dilday v. DirectTV decision from the Eastern
District Court of Virginia, employers received some relief from lawsuits for
certain technical violations of the
federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
During the Texas legislative sessions, lawmakers filed nearly 40 anti-abortion regulations — several of which passed under Senate Bill 8, which includes a ban on
certain abortion procedures that has been blocked in
federal district court.