There are
certain issues people are unable to compromise on and if any of these are present, it is important to identify and address them before making a commitment.
Not exact matches
He is a smart guy and a champion in the sport and
people want to know how he feels on
certain issues.
«As a result [of the technical
issue],
certain posts with content that violated our policies were made visible to
people visiting Marketplace,» Mary Ku, Facebook's director of product management, said in a prepared statement.
It is a seamless way of keeping the right
people in touch, usually hyper - focused around a
certain topic or
issue.
And then there's the
issue of co-signer release, which enables you to become the sole
person responsible for your loan after you've reached a
certain income and credit score, and made a set amount of on - time payments.
I think that we are the ones who elevate the
issue to almost salvific proportions, I am
certain that sexual orientation does not save a
person.
It only begins to address that
issue for
people of
certain professions in the NT.
From trying to join movements and realizing that they're not a good fit, to trying to rally
people around a
certain issue and failing miserably, to simply getting into a Twitter conversation that turns antagonistic, sometimes activists and advocates fail.
They're willing to confront
certain issues, but not others, such as the leadership bullying
certain people.
She also mentions particular
people who can supply eye - witness testimony to
certain events or
issues.
It is unliveable at the level of society: hence, in Britain we have a government that lauds the freedom of the individual (and it should be noted in passing, but noted very well, that our present generation of politicians rarely talk of the «human
person» or just of the «
person», but usually of the «individual») but which has brought in some of the most draconian legislation in Europe designed to control what
people say and do on
certain issues so that society can proceed in its life as a unity and not just as a mere collection of individuals.
I know
people who for personal reasons are for or against
certain religious / social / political
issues who migrated to religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree with these
peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.
you many times got «us vs them» mentaility especially on
certain issues (pot growing in city limits for example) the government is made up by INDIVIDUal
people..
On the other hand one should mention that he possessed a
certain aloofness; he was distanced from things; from
people as well as from the
issues he was dealing with, and even a
certain basic distance from his Church.
There used to be a time where
people would admit that they are not educated in a
certain area, and they would rely on the experts to explain the impact of an
issue to them.
Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and
issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded
people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of
people in search of a safe place who do not have any of the same
issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a
certain portion of
people from safety by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money
issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.
They noted that when average income in a nation rose to a
certain point,
people turned attention from
issues of economic survival to concern for the health of the environment.
The real
issue is not should
certain practices be allowed, but how is the church to be welcoming and affirming and loving of all
people at all times in all places.
That used to not be such an
issue because American society was very modern (as opposed to post modern) and
people were used to going to the doctor, going to the movies, using a
certain spoon for soup, not wearing white before Labor Day.
The faith - group programs, representing Protestant, Catholics, and Jews, have consistently provided documentaries, dramas, and discussions which dealt with
issues almost never touched by commercial broadcasting: the economic factors behind nuclear armaments; the
issues behind draft evasion (during the Vietnam War); the real causes of worldwide starvation; and the problems of
people who are ignored almost completely by the media, such as the aging who can not live on their pensions, unwed mothers, farm workers who have no homes, undocumented aliens whom we wish to employ but not pay, and refugees we are sending back to
certain death in their own countries.
Church leaders are accused of fostering psychological violence against homosexual
people by repeating
certain myths or ignoring the important
issues responsible for many problems that gay and lesbian
people experience, both in churches and the wider society.
But I think that is the
issue devin,
certain people (not you) like Bill O'Reilly and others wantt to plant the Christian Flag and claim ownership of the season.
Then historians, theologians, other scholars, amid ordinary
people would still have very useful analytical tools for thinking about
certain fundamental
issues.
Although Lincoln is often praised for this remark by those who oppose the mixing of religion and politics, it contains three of the most controversial ideas in American politics: that it is legitimate to invoke the name of God within the realm of political discourse; that God's existence isn't merely symbolic, but that he is always right; and that since God takes sides on
certain issues, some
people will be divinely justified while others will stand in opposition not only to their political opponents but to the very Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.
«many
people are offended and / or frustrated by the very sight of the cross because of the atrocities committed by the church and positions the church takes on
certain issues.»
And then comes: the taboo subjects; talking about
people as if they are not there (or as if they are an «
issue», not a
person); assuming everyone (who counts) is of a
certain race, ability, class, language, sexuality or gender; various non-biblical behavioural rules; the targeted enforcement of church rules (whether «biblical» or not) on particular groups; and the general reluctance to see things from another's perspective (even if this is a skill that churchgoers use all day, every day, outside thw church).
And furthermore, you became able to predict or know what a
person thought or felt about a
certain topic or
issue even if you had never talked about it.
While my body does not tolerate nightshades (which a potato is, and why some diets and
people with
certain inflammatory health
issues shouldn't consume them) I do believe in their nutritional content and I do have one once a month or so for the taste.
The fermentation process used to make cheese and yogurt also reduces the lactose, which explains why some
people with lactose
issues can enjoy
certain fermented dairy products.
Some
people with
certain medical conditions such as renal
issues or diabetes really need that info.
«But just as every season seems to be full of the same old
issues for Arsenal in general, is the failure of
certain Arsenal stars to play to their potential on regular basis perhaps caused by the same thing (
person), Wenger?»
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to
issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional
people» to maintain a
certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding
people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
And after reading this book I've quoted below (although not directly relating to the
issue of subsidies in the U.S.) it's become clear to me that policymaking to effect
certain behaviors in
people is not always intuitive or straightforward...
A few
people took very vocal
issue with me personally, calling me judgmental of the parents involved, and of a
certain parenting style even.
The amount of gas a
person expels can be an indication of
certain internal
issues.
These
issues can be fundamental to the development of
certain aspects of being a well rounded
person.
I'd surrounded myself with exclusively breastfeeding moms but I also found online a little milk supply support group and oh my god it was just like these are my
people you know like at that point in time so I think sometimes you know when you do have
certain issues it is really nice to be around the
people that have the same
issues however I mean all of us have
issues with breastfeeding so even being around the mommas who were able to just take out their boob and you know nurse right away were I was taking out a supplement nursing system you know.
I appreciate that
certain individuals want to take a victory lap on this topic — but this is a complicated
issue and many
people lost jobs and many communities have suffered.
It could be tricky admitting you're wrong about
certain things, but in some
people's cases, they're just too far gone and have been behaving the same way for so long, it'll be near on impossible to address and ultimately rectify the
issues.
But there's got to be alliances with the Liberals, Scottish and Welsh nationalists, the Greens, and many
people who have left the party over
certain issues.
My interest in this whole
issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of
persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to
certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national
issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?
I don't think it would be appropriate for a serious leader of his calibre to consult somebody who has supervised the disintegration of his party, sacked
persons who hold contrary views to his, supervised bloodshed in his party and breeded experts in insults, on serious national
issues.Ideologically you come from different dispositions but matured politicians bury ideological inclinations when it comes to deciding on
certain sensitive
issues.
She also laments a trend on the left and right of shouting down those who hold contrary opinions, and criticises the media for creating a culture whereby only
certain groups of
people are seen as valid to comment on
issues from feminism, Brexit or religion.
And
people can call that spin if they like but the reality is that I think the public would spend a lot of time quite bewildered about why the government takes
certain decisions on
certain issues unless you have someone out there saying «this is why we're doing this» on
issues as complicated as whether to bomb Syria or not.»
«They take it as a given, even though some
people were defeated and that was one of the
issues on which they were defeated upon in
certain parts of the state, having voted for that
issue.»
- the ones that always «forgive» lol) have a problem with homosexuality which most rational
people don't have; so is it such a BIG
issue that they don't allow
certain people in their homes?
The federal subpoena
issued in late April seeking information about the actions of
certain Executive Chamber employees on behalf of a number of companies mentions two firms that were represented by Howe at 2013 state governmental meetings, according to records and a
person with knowledge of the document.
Since 2014, police have generally
issued summonses to
people caught with 25 grams of marijuana, with
certain exceptions, but continued to arrest
people caught smoking in public.
«While Nigerian Army would not want to join
issues with the Elder Statesman, however,
certain facts need to be clearly stated in the interest of the Taraba
People and the Nigerian public:
PROTECT families by supporting proposals that would keep guns out of the wrong hands, including the Extreme Risk Protection Order bill, which would make it possible for families and law enforcement to remove firearms from loved ones who could be a danger to themselves or others, and making permanent Kendra's Law, which grants judges the authority to
issue orders that require
people who meet
certain criteria to regularly undergo psychiatric treatment.