Sentences with phrase «certain judge rule»

For instance, how might a certain judge rule on a motion?

Not exact matches

In a court ruling authorizing the arrests, Brazilian federal judge André Duszczak said «Faria and other BRF officers sought to cover up claims of possible food contamination, as shown in certain laboratory tests, made by a former employee in a labor lawsuit.»

A judge has ruled the bankrupt toy store's executives can receive millions in bonuses if it meets certain milestones.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

While the NCAA could appeal Judge Wilken's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court, the NCAA might prefer an easier and more certain approach.

Dietl tried to defend his April comments about expecting a certain judge to rule against him because she «looked like Chirlane de Blasio,» the mayor's wife, during what may have been the most raucous scene of the evening.

If the defense claims a judge erred in admitting certain evidence, rearguing that point in a post-trial motion gives the judge a chance to clarify the earlier ruling, which could make it harder for the defense to win the point on appeal.

Instead, Apple filed motions last month to appeal Judge Denise Cote's date for the damages portion of the ongoing case — damages which can be as high as 800 + million dollars, if punitive rulings are imposed — on the grounds that they were certain the case would be thrown out once it finishes with its appeal of Cote's guilty ruling, making the damages trial a waste of time and money.

You have to admire a judge who quotee Emily Dickenson in her ruling and reflects a certain amount of cynicism as well:

Judge Jones ruled borrowers may indeed have the legal right to cancel certain private student loans and he is allowing this case to move forward as an expanding class - action suit.

For certain arbitrators, this means, users will be able to see their analytics as a judge, their rulings as a judge and their decisions as an arbitrator.

Users will now be able to see not only how judges tend to rule on certain types of motions, but they will also be able to see the actual rulings.

As courts roll out deeply absurd and / or unworkable rulings on things like cell phones and texting, I'm reminded of what it was like to watch the law in the late 1990s, when everyone — judges and otherwise — was utterly confounded by these «mp3s» and certain we'd never really have to deal with them because they were some esoteric thing that would probably die out.

# 1 - many of the arguments derived from the language in certain ethical rules could just as easily be leveled against judges who have clerks write their judicial opinions and senior partners who have junior associates write their briefs or law journal articles.

To do so, they will have to rely on admissible evidence the police have collected against you and put it to the judge in a manner that follows certain rules (or the «rules of evidence»).

The key error, however, was the motion judge's assessment that the FLR governed certain procedural aspects inadequately, and that he should look to the civil procedure rules for guidance instead.

And, if it a litigation matter and if after a month of trial on that one matter and we KNOW, we are absolutely certain that the LAW and the facts that came out at trial warrant a finding by the Court in our favor, but the Judge rules in our favor and on our motion might even grant a new trial and so we start over again, how can one figure that in?

The judge will be ruling on whether certain of the banks» basic and historic personal account contractual terms (as with the current contracts) are susceptible to the test of fairness but not void as penalties.

In R & R Developments Ltd v AXA Insurance UK plc [2009] Lawtel 30 September Ch Mr Nicholas Strauss QC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge) ruled (obiter) that the subjective understanding of the question by the insured was neither crucial nor relevant although certain insurance law textbooks suggested to the contrary.

«We thus reject the philosophy buttressing the trial judge's ruling that, because the employer buys the employee's energies and talents during a certain portion of each workday, anything that the employee does during those hours becomes company property.»

The Hryniak decision backed Ontario's new rules on summary judgment (judgment made on a claim, without full trial, when a judge finds an issue can be decided based on certain facts or clear, incontrovertible evidence), and provided guidance on when it can be used.

Qualcomm asks the Federal Circuit to reverse certain parts of Judge Posner's FRAND ruling and, while noting that «both parties to this appeal are commercial partners and customers of Qualcomm», effectively (and unsurprisingly) sides with Google.

Reasons included (1) judges «grade on a curve» and, after sitting through 20 cases involving violent crimes, might not find a more minor crime as serious whereas a jury would not share this context; (2) defendants will select those judges who they believe will be more inclined to acquit; (3) judges are bound by fixed sentencing rules so rather than sentence a defendant of a nonserious crime to a lengthy term they avoid that dilemma through acquittal; (4) judges might better understand the complex elements of certain corporate crimes and, unlike a jury, would recognize when the prosecution failed to carry its burden and (5) some judges may just have something against prosecutors.

At a pre-hearing review, Employment Judge Lewzey ruled that certain correspondence marked «without prejudice» was admissible in evidence.

It therefore ruled that the judge had been right to hold that s 17 had not been complied with as regarded certain instalments of rent.

An advisory committee to the Florida Supreme Court informed the Palm Beach Circuit chief judge that an administrative order that throws out certain motions in foreclosure cases as «abandoned» is a local rule.

Next, to the merits of the appeal, Mr. Stallan argued the trial judge's ruling had been based on a «simple misunderstanding» caused by an absence of consideration for certain excerpts of a trial transcripts in the Family Action below.

In a webinar on 1 November, Ms Green promises to show how to use Bloomberg's new tool to: «Uncover relationships among law firms, companies and judges to inform litigation strategy; Understand a judge's behavior when ruling on certain motions; Better predict possible litigation outcomes through data visualization».

As judicial campaign spending increases, there is growing concern that judges step aside from hearing cases that involve campaign supporters or issues where the judge made a campaign pledge to rule a certain way once elected to the bench.

Once a party makes a request for certain evidence, the judge will rule on the request.

But Judge Crabb told Motorola that its ongoing appeal of Judge Posner's ruling does not change the fact that certain issues have been adjudicated by a district court.

In a December 8, 2014 ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom concluded that it violates the First Amendment's protection of free speech for The Florida Bar to prevent a lawyer from using past results in advertising their services in certain media.

It may, however, form chambers, each consisting of three, five or seven Judges, either to undertake certain preparatory inquiries or to adjudicate on particular categories of cases in accordance with rules laid down for these purposes.

But when he starts reeling off statistics like how a particular judge tends to rule in certain types of cases, «they lean forward, put their elbows on the table, and start asking questions,» he says.

It may, in certain cases determined by its rules of procedure, sit in full court or in a chamber of five judges or of a single judge.

In certain instances, the trial judge needs to make a ruling as to whether a particular juror, even if given an accommodation, is qualified to serve.

Justice Brown encouraged Judges to use the tools given to them, namely the Rules of Civil Procedure and the inherent jurisdiction of the court, to drill down and question whether certain summary judgment motions are appropriate, given the nature and progress of the particular lawsuit.

While it is true that judgments based on statutes will be binding only while the relevant parts of that statute is in force, I suppose my question deals with the scenario where judges would prefer to rule in a certain way, however are unable to do so because of statutes that haven't been amended to reflect changing community values, and they do not want to set a precedent in the meantime.

@NewAlexandria: For instance, if judges were required to rule in a certain manner due to (perhaps outdated legislation), but they did not want their decision to be binding on subordinate courts.

Alan Young, the lawyer acting on behalf of Terri - Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott, has reached an agreement with the Crown which will extend until November 28, 2010 the Ontario judge's stay beyond the original 30 days, delaying implementation of her ruling, if the Crown takes certain steps to expedite the case.

What are the chances a certain motion will be approved by a particular judge, based on all his or her past rulings?

The law does allow judges to deviate from the statutory guidelines, but certain rules regulate this as well.

The judge could also prohibit either of you from taking the child to a country that does not follow certain rules on international child abduction, force you to surrender your child's passport or post a bond large enough to discourage abduction.

When a court in Pennsylvania issues a custody or visitation order, the judge now is required to explain what factors were considered and why a certain ruling was reached.

With this vagueness, case law — a record of how other judges have ruled in the past — often creates a presumption that an issue should be handled in a certain way.

A judge rules that the inclusion of certain properties in General Growth's bankruptcy filing is sound.