Not exact matches
As a number
of observers have pointed out (including Fortune), the question isn't so much whether Facebook filters out
certain kinds of news — something that newspapers and other media
entities do every day without much scrutiny.
Yet the central - state materialist replies that images are not really spatial
entities of any
kind at all except perhaps in appearance — they are the way in which
certain brain processes appear to the material system which we call a person and whose brain it is.
The «ontological principle» is not only that each
of these
kinds «is» in a distinctively different sense, but that there is a
certain primacy in the sense in which ousia «is» or an actual
entity «is.»
My case was one in which the author, editor and reader are all known
entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural and social context as the writing and editing; and the reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D. and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a
certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.
The idea that the whole is a new
entity distinct from the parts arises from a tendency to ignore a
certain kind of part that enters into the essential composition
of any natural
entity — its form or structure.
Generally, to be an accredited investor you must be a
certain kind of business
entity (e.g. a bank), or a member
of a
certain set
of professions (e.g. lawyers and brokers), or have a
certain net worth and / or income.