A libel case, like all lawsuits, involves the government's judicial branch using its coercive power to make you pay money as a result of your speech, based on a law requiring you to pay money for
certain kinds of speech.
The more Facebook tries to move beyond its original role as a social network for sharing family photos and other ephemera, the more it finds itself in an ethical minefield, torn between its desire to improve the world and its need to curb
certain kinds of speech.
If Facebook censors
certain kinds of speech, then for tens of millions of people it effectively ceases to exist, or becomes significantly less obvious.
Not exact matches
* In the first place, while the language
of religion is metaphorical, this blanket statement needs to be broken down so that we see that
certain distinctive forms
of speech are appropriate to
certain distinctive
kinds of biblical reference.
Scientific language («The temperature was -5 degrees Fahrenheit») seeks language that has a
certain kind of precision lacking in our ordinary
speech — a precision that we can quantify and test, that can be used to settle disputes about how cold it actually is.
Bullshit, suggests Chait: Obama has in fact «used exactly the
kind of rhetoric Westen accuses him
of refusing to deploy,» but structural and practical obstacles like «special interest lobbying, the filibuster, macroeconomic conditions, not to mention
certain settled beliefs
of public opinion» can defeat the loftiest
of presidential
speeches.
Inner
speech also seems to help people perform
certain kinds of cognitive tasks.
If there's a
certain airlessness to Folman's live - action aesthetic and a tendency to over-egg some
of the
speeches, it does set up a
kind of artificial, sci - fi - ish tone early on, even in this, the least fantastical part
of the film.
It has the same type
of kid with the same type
of powers, the same kidnapping plot, the same high - kicking female sidekick, the same
kind of tone and sense
of humor, and very similar scenes involving the boy's lack
of speech and unwillingness to eat
certain things.
This analysis reflects the fact that the federal Constitution protects us from
certain kinds of governmental action — such as state - imposed segregation, prohibitions on free
speech, or invasions
of personal privacy — but does not create expansive positive rights or guarantee governmental assistance.