If you think this line of argument seems silly, would someone please explain how this law is any different from the proposals of the so - called «gun grabbers» to require law - abiding gun owners to register their weapons, and to restrict the right to ownership of
certain kinds of weapons that are clearly designed only to kill human beings on an industrial scale?
We're really sensitive to things like how adding
certain kinds of weapons into multiplayer that you have to pay for would create imbalance among the players.
Not exact matches
Chemical
weapons, like
certain other
kinds of weapons are banned not because
of people killed by them, but because
of what they do to the survivors.
Certain kinds of male fruit flies, for instance, use a cocktail
of proteins in their ejaculate as a secret
weapon to gain the edge; these proteins induce the female to increase her sperm uptake or her rate
of egg - laying, or even to prevent her from considering any new suitors.
Kind of like how Naoto from P4A had to reload her
weapon to continue a
certain ability, same idea applies with characters like Junpei Iori with his baseball themed play style.
The combat, which often amounts to randomly failing a sword in front
of your face, achieves a
certain depth through the wide amount
of weapons available, and there is a definite satisfaction to uncovering a new elemental boomerang, or forging a new
kind of magical cane that mixes up the way you approach the flying eyeballs and fireball - spitting demons you'll come across.