Sentences with phrase «certain people choose»

Sometimes you have to wonder why certain people choose to have pets.

I think that many people can relate to the idea of certain people choosing to take the bible as a means to not have to have think any longer.

«Editorial Content» Posted on such portions of the Website will include Content provided by those certain persons chosen by Non-GMO Project to contribute, will be reviewed and edited by Non-GMO Project's team, and will align with Non-GMO Project's core values (in contrast to any other Posted Content by, e.g., You or other Website users, which Posted Content Non-GMO Project may or may not screen per Section 4 (d)(viii) above).

Not exact matches

«It's companies that have decided, «we would prefer to pick and choose when we'd like to pay people for certain services, and we're not going to have them on as full - time employees on a regular basis,»» she said.

But those efforts by certain superstar artists aren't stopping people from choosing to stream songs instead of buying individual albums.

«There has to be a certain chemistry in the inner circle, and for him to choose those people in six weeks is a short time frame.»

Part of why people choose Nike has to do with a certain image people have of the company.»

In addition, with the Connections setting, you can choose advanced targeting, which lets you include or exclude people who are connected to certain pages, apps or events.

Of course, this means delegating certain responsibilities, and trusting the people you chose as experts.

Asked about Trump «s quips, White House spokesman Raj Shah said: «Certain Washington politicians choose to fight for foreign countries, but President Trump will always fight for the American people.»

There are certain tasks in a person's life where schedule, effort, attention, and other types of investment cross paths and we are left to have to choose one from the other.

You selectively choose certain people to listen to — namely from whatever Christian sphere you are comfortable with.

If a group of people choose to live by a certain set of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.

But they do disclose to us certain important truths, upon which the attainment of our eternal salvation depends, and they do also give a popular description of the origin of the human race and of the chosen people.

What songs you choose, how long your worship service is, or the way you preach all communicate certain things about the kind of people that are welcome there and the kind that aren't.

And if people say they choose not to live a certain way.

The fact that your deity «chooses» certain people should be enough to let anyone see that such a god is as petulant as the leader of a high school clique, and thus imaginary

OR, might God choose to reveal truth through the experiences of a people who tried to be true to him, certain moral principles, failing again and trying again, people looking for universal truths and communicating them to their children generation after generation, orally and through writing things down, organizing themselves into communities and societies, aiming for justice, teaching each other, defending their families, lives, cities, and governments.

I'm not suggesting that all persons of faith are this way, but many of the more vocal religious people that get air time in the media (especially elected officials) choose to believe certain aspects of their religious doctrine and ignore / reject those tenets that do not fall in line with their socio - political agendas.

I am quite certain that the great majority of people would, if need be, choose survival even at the expense of isolation and loneliness.

In the biblical tradition, God was thought to possess full knowledge of human history, past and present; and from time to time he chose to reveal the future to certain select people, such as Joseph, Daniel and John of Patmos.

In John 15:16, Jesus provides an extremely clear statement about what it means to be chosen and why certain people are chosen by God, and by Himself.

Rather than the positive - sum notion of biblical chosenness» «through you all the nations of the world will be blessed...»» the Nazis articulated a vision in which the very existence of the rival chosen people, the Jews, meant the certain death of the German people.

In that conversation, voices have been heard urging a view of conscience that is curious, even dangerous: Under certain circumstances, conscience may permit or even require that a person choose acts that the Church has consistently taught are intrinsically wrong — such as using artificial means of contraception, or receiving Holy Communion while living the married life in a union that's not been blessed by the Church.

Allah may choose to punish certain individuals or whole groups of people [Fir «awn or the people of «Ad / Thamuwd] in this life but that is the prerogative of God!

Whether friend or foe, we all fall short of the glory of God The gift of the sacrifice of God's son saved everyone who belives Jesus died for all and resurrected from death., thereby defeating death of the soul caused by sin Salvation can not be earned It is the gift of God As for why God allowed the Egyptians to die, God saved his chosen people from certain death by killing those who would surely cause the same.

We have known for a long time that the ancient Israelite believed that through certain actions or rites he was able to be present at, and actually share in, the events of the past which had created his people's life and thus had made him what as a member of that nation he was: a man who belonged to «the chosen people of God».

@Stupid poeple -(or person)... It's easy to pick and choose certain verses in the Bible and use them out of context.

Then comes the statement: God raised him up, and manifested him to certain chosen witnesses, his disciples, who were now commissioned to preach to the people and to testify that he was the one «appointed by God to be the judge of the living and the dead; to him all the prophets bear witness, that through his name everyone who believes on him [trusts in him] shall receive remission of sins» and so be saved in the last great Day, now close at hand.

People choose to hang on to certain scripture that they feel best suits their own personal moral guidelines.

In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.

I don't see where it ever says that God chose certain people to «believe» in Him.

I don't understand the reason people choose certain handle's on BBV and can't imagine caring about the significance of a handle.

The idea in theory seemed an easy task, however choosing the XI was difficult and I am certain people will disagree with my squad.

And a certain amount of people choose to be celibate.

Instead you could host the competition on your blog and let people know you'll choose a winner from everyone who comments on your Facebook posts over a certain time period.

Group your items so people looking for certain designs will easily find the matching handmade bracelets and handcrafted necklaces for the handmade earrings they have chosen.

And, if so, would that mean fewer people would actually choose to marry, or even cohabit, given how «there is evidence of a certain fatigue with the difficulties of dealing with people,» as Sherry Turkle, a clinical psychologist and professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, notes.

Some people choose their baby's names before the birth while others wait to meet the baby and then discover that a certain name just «fits.»

We know that there were councilors who were chosen by lots who ran certain districts / held certain positions, but what did these people do on a day to day basis?

We have consistently agreed that there is a certain point at which freedom of choice means allowing people to choose stupid actions.

Other proposed bills would require the city to provide free diapers at certain social services buildings; allow inmates in city jails to choose the gender of their doctor; report more details about unlicensed child care centers and maternal mortality; and assess the accessibility of doulas to pregnant people around the city.

When the stuff being sent wasn't robotic hardware or scientific instruments, the people who chose what it would be approached the decision - making with a certain amount of seriousness about what it would say about the senders, what it would all mean.

But as Anne - Lise Giraud explains, «Equally we do not know why certain people quite unconsciously choose one direction rather than the other, but predisposition surely plays a part, because we all learn to integrate auditory and visual information by the time we are three.

Whenever stimuli are present which people have come to associate with certain snacks, they choose the accompanying (unhealthy) food product, even when they know it is unhealthy or aren't really craving that food product.

Nevertheless, when people encounter stimuli that they have learned to associate with certain snacks, they tend to choose those products, even when they know these are unhealthy.

«The problem with this is that it assumes people develop personalities and at a certain point, choose an ideology to match their personality.

Lots of people are diagnosed with allergies or have bad reactions to certain food ingredients which is why they choose to avoid them.

Looking back through my closet, I connect with the person I was when I chose certain pieces; I remember where I wore them, and how I felt.

To prevent this inflammation, some people choose to avoid certain inflammatory foods like gluten and dairy products.