In addition, many communities work particularly well for
certain people even as they are challenging for others, he added.
This would have been inconceivable a few years ago, but now things have become so political, that
certain people even want to re-write the Bitcoin whitepaper.
For many of us this process is subconscious — but there is a familiarity — often a strange but powerful attraction to certain people - and sometimes along with the attraction is an irresistible desire to stay with
a certain person even if things are going horribly wrong.
Not exact matches
As hard as it may be for most
people (and
even for some curmudgeonly editors) to understand,
certain things worth saying simply can't be said in a sentence or two.
And, as she connected founders and investors, she saw that more often than not, it was the white male founders she helped that received the most opportunities: «It became clear really fast that there were
certain people who were not getting meetings,
even if they had a really great company.»
«
Even better, also ask the
people selling in the space if they could sell it for a
certain price.»
According to Sandberg,
even though there are jobs that require a
certain level of experience, she's found that «
people with great skills can do more things well.»
For the same reasons regular
people feel emotional connections to
certain movies, songs, and television shows, moguls have a track record of becoming enamored with «content,»
even when that leads them to make bad financial decisions.
Some
people will not immediately feel comfortable receiving
certain items via mail,
even less so when it's on their doorstep within 48 hours.
Color
even triggers
certain emotions in
people.
Even the smartest
people in the world can become smarter and more skilled in
certain aspects of life.
«Many
people are deficient and don't
even know it — and not getting enough may increase the risk of osteoporosis, heart disease and
certain types of cancer,» she warns.
CySEC is one of the stricter regulators out there, and this means that IQ Option has
certain rules that they need to follow when allowing
people to use their site,
even their demo accounts.
2015 is the only year we know for
certain that
people will be allowed to contribute $ 10,000 to their Tax - Free Savings Account (investment income earned within a TFSA is not taxed,
even when withdrawn).
Companies,
even without realizing it, have biases that promote
people who look and act a
certain way (like those traditional leaders) into leadership positions, perpetuating inequality at the top.
When
people start going crazy over a
certain asset —
even the ones who couldn't have cared less a year earlier.
It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet
certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (
even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many
people realize) and overall ignorant minds.
Well it is true that some
people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a
certain moment of mating... or
even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them
even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or
even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
I am
certain the
people that are involved vary significantly regarding religion and spirituality depending on what part of the country they're located, and
even within the same town or city.
But at the same time, I see Paul and John and Peter in their letters telling the churches to not listen to
certain people because they teach incorrect doctrine, and
even sometimes having them remove
people from the fellowship.
Without either
person knowing for
certain if someone points to the jar and says «There are an
even number of gumballs in the jar» should I believe them?
Since when did
people of the Bronze Age were ever less intelligent or developed than we are today other than
certain technological advancements, which by the way not
even everything technologically speaking is necessarily more advance today it was say two thousand, three thousand, or
even four thousand years ago, so I have no idea where you get that reasoning from.
So if
people are totally depraved (see the link list below) so that they can not
even believe in Jesus for eternal life or respond positively to God in any way, then God must unilaterally give eternal life to
certain people.
Put in the right hands, the Enneagram is a tool to show
people how their inner life blinds them to
certain patterns and motivations —
even to
certain virtues.
He conveniently overlooks
certain other considerations favorable to socialism; when these considerations are given their due,
even some practical
people unafflicted by the need for a secular religion will find the alleged superiority of capitalism something less than obvious.
I think if for millions of years
people worshipped a rock, the investment of powerful, human energy would endow that rock with
certain qualities,
even a
certain consciousness.
On the other hand one should mention that he possessed a
certain aloofness; he was distanced from things; from
people as well as from the issues he was dealing with, and
even a
certain basic distance from his Church.
Even if we were
certain of the original meaning of the root underlying the Hebrew noun we could hardly take this as conclusive evidence of the basic understanding of the Old Testament prophet in the middle centuries of the first millenium B.C. Rather, we will have to understand the sense of the term nabi» from the
person of the prophet himself as he appears and functions in the community of ancient Israel.
I'm also not that knowledgeable with the contents of the bible (yet) but I'm a fighter and I have a lot of determination so eventually I will be able to reference
certain biblical facts or
even bible verses to relate to a
persons struggles.
So, I sincerely and respectfully ask of individuals who back anti-choice campaigns by citing personal moral or religious reasons this question, which I ask out honest curiosity: how can you recognize the consequences, historically, of legally banning a
certain choice a
person makes, and maintain that your moral code has not been violated, or
even argue that your moral or religious code has been upheld, or elevated?
You can also buy any other book you want right then and there and you can get
people to sync up with your account to instantly share books and
even interactively read by highlighting
certain parts and writing notes in margins (which you can do with real books too I know, but this way won't ruin the books themselves).
I know that John Paul II takes a dimmer view of American society than would totally gladden my heart; and I must confess that I have felt a
certain cold wind at my back as I listened to him caution
people in Latin America who do not
even yet own shoes against falling into the trap of materialism.
For example, there are claims that
certain people in the very early church suppressed
certain writings, changed
certain writings and
even produced writings purporting to be from the hands of Paul or the Apostles.
I am quite
certain that the great majority of
people would, if need be, choose survival
even at the expense of isolation and loneliness.
We have organic church, simple church, and missional communities, but
even here, in most of the books and blogs I read about this, the emphasis always seems to be that the church is only functioning when the
people gather in a
certain place at a
certain time, usually in a house on Sunday morning.
Up to a
certain point, this applies
even in a relationship in which the other
person treats one strictly as It, for the other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he treats us.
Anyone who has immersed himself in a
certain subject is infinitely more alive to other things than the
person who has stopped short at a general education,
even though these subjects be completely outside his special field.
I simply can not understand that
people could be so anwaveringly
certain that there is an all powerful higher being, but can not
even begin to explain him, let alone come to a concensus on what he is and does.
While that sounds great in theory, and many
people would tacitly, or
even with great show agree to such an idea, I fear that in practice the Bible is often not seen through the lens of Jesus, but rather through the lens of a
certain theology or through the lens of the beliefs of groups or
even individuals.
In still other cases
certain catchwords and theories of the church - growth
people appear in a denomination's literature, but they are either so poorly integrated into the total approach or so changed from what movement theorists Win Arn and Donald McGavran write about that one wonders why the terminology is
even used.
It must be admitted that there are
certain potential vices to virtue ethics
even in its minimalist mode, i.e.,
even when it does not try to crowd out the legitimate insights of deontologists and utilitarians (e.g., from the deontological side, that there are limits — deontoi — regarding what any virtuous
person can be permitted to do, and, from the utilitarian side, that there are calculations which are relevant regarding many moral decisions the virtuous
person must make).
Nature has equipped me with a
certain talent, and it is my responsibility to use it for something that is uplifting, that will enhance and embellish the lives of
people who also have been given something in that they can
even receive it.
You can be
certain that is not Louie Giglio —
even still some prefer to believe that any opposition to homosexual practice, and
people who hold that view, must apparently be silenced for the common good.
Furthermore, we have to recognize that when God uses this sort of language about
certain sins, it is not because He that upset at the
person for committing the sin, or
even at the sin itself for being so «terrible.»
Occasionally, Hartshorne
even speaks of a «besouled body,» but by such language he means only the probability of
certain modes of action and experience that embody a given personality's characteristic traits.11 Consequently, he suggests that, when a
person's body goes into a deep, dreamless sleep, the soul loses its actuality, only to regain it when the
person awakens.12 Understandably, therefore, he disregards as inapplicable to his own view Gilbert Ryle's well - known caricature of Cartesian anthropological dualism as «the dogma of the Ghost in the Machine» — especially since Hartshorne denies that the human body is a «machine» in any materialistic, mechanical sense.13
In that conversation, voices have been heard urging a view of conscience that is curious,
even dangerous: Under
certain circumstances, conscience may permit or
even require that a
person choose acts that the Church has consistently taught are intrinsically wrong — such as using artificial means of contraception, or receiving Holy Communion while living the married life in a union that's not been blessed by the Church.
Even then,
certain conditions are attached to minimize the violence and damage done to
people and property.
St. John Chrysostom, an outstanding doctor of the Eastern tradition, was particularly pessimistic: «Among thousands of
people there are not a hundred who will arrive at their salvation, and I am not
even certain of that number, so much perversity is there among the young and so much negligence among the old.»
It is sad, there are instances where the accused is innocent, but
people won't believe (
even within
certain diocese).
Even though this cartoon humorously describes the history of the kiss of devotion, it also shows the elevation of devotion to a
certain person.