Sentences with phrase «certain people simply»

And yet, for some reason, certain people simply can not fathom that they are consuming more calories than they need — and are gaining fat as a result of it.

Not exact matches

As hard as it may be for most people (and even for some curmudgeonly editors) to understand, certain things worth saying simply can't be said in a sentence or two.

It's easy when we're star struck to think of charisma as some magical X factor certain people are simply born with.

This takes a certain kind of inner strength that is simply too much for many people.

Most people said they binge - watch simply because they fall behind on watching new episodes of a certain show, while others said they simply didn't hear about a new show until several episodes had already aired and they wanted to catch up.

While stable work hours make for organizational order, the creative muse can not be simply willed into being exactly from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. People have different rhythms that make them more or less productive during certain hours.

And if certain people or situations get your blood boiling (and you don't need them for your everyday work), why not simply avoid them to the extent possible?

Some people work and interact a certain way, and you simply can't change them.

Another reason why I believe that many people procrastinate is simply because they're overwhelmed or intimidated by certain tasks.

I don't know why people, in attempting to provide a refutation of an argument, consistently rebut arguments by simply mentioning their nationality, as if being of a certain nationality designates one as an expert in all matters concerning that nation and serves as sufficient qualification to denounce a valid opposition viewpoint.

We're simply a platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin between each other in a certain country.

When we are confronted by these people, in addition to simply stating that «now» is always a good time to buy stocks, we will often introduce some contra - evidence in an attempt to make them a little less certain that they can time the market.

Some of the phrases used, for instance, imply that the people who hold certain beliefs are disingenuous, rather than simply wrong.

From trying to join movements and realizing that they're not a good fit, to trying to rally people around a certain issue and failing miserably, to simply getting into a Twitter conversation that turns antagonistic, sometimes activists and advocates fail.

However, the point simply is Paul is warning them about certain actions they are either committing or they see in society around them being committed — to avoid such actions as a person of the Spirit... so obviously with the Spirit they could still make common mistakes.

But when we really look at the what blasphemy is, we find that most of these sermons, books, and pastors were simply misinformed or were trying to control other people to act or behave a certain way.

Supportive counseling with certain people does much more than simply sustain them.

Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of people in search of a safe place who do not have any of the same issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a certain portion of people from safety by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.

But it IS worthy to note that people continue to sheepishly believe absurdities about certain personalities that are put out there by people promulgating this or that ideology or simply trying to exercise social control by making people feel unworthy in comparison to ruling elites.

This is simply something that helps certain people cope.

I simply can not understand that people could be so anwaveringly certain that there is an all powerful higher being, but can not even begin to explain him, let alone come to a concensus on what he is and does.

• There is an «unlovely tendency» in certain kinds of liberalism, writes Peter Berkowitz in the Wilson Quarterly, to assume that people who disagree with you are simply unreasonable.

And I think the people attracted can be «a certain type of person» who thrives on that, but a lot are simply vulnerable when they come to it and get no good from it at all.

Hark — you're a follower of a system that condemns people to an eternity of torture simply because they think a certain way.

The Anglo - American idea... means that the party who does not abide by certain specific decrees emanating from a judicial body is a contumacious person and may, as a rule, be held in contempt of court, fined and jailed... Now, this very concept of contempt simply does not belong to the world of ideas of a Latin lawyer.

Many people are indoctrinated into the religions of their families or communities, or they they live in a part of the world where a certain religion (such as Islam in the Middle East) is dominant — and they simply never question the beliefs they were raised with.

Voting for someone simply because he is of a certain church, party, race, etc. is just as dumb and unthinking as not voting for that person for the same reasons.

This means we do not have to be certain but simply «confident enough» to follow that person (e.g. Jesus) in trust, and let that trust grow through deepening relationship which includes wrestling with our doubts.

For the goal is not simply the «renewal» of traditional symbols but, more radically, the creation of an encounter situation which will, as Wilder says, give «that certain shock to the imagination,» helping people to say «Yes,» not simply with their heads, but with commitment to be lived out in their entire lives.

He simply wants to be thought of as a certain kind of person and so he makes an effort to mimic that kind of person.

People tend to forget that a lot of FA may simply not want to play for certain teams.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

The reason is that it destroys a child's intrinsic motivation and teaches him to behave in certain ways simply to please other people.

These people may share some, even all, of the core of ideas, but don't have the cult mentality, and are simply individuals with certain preferences.

The blood type and the Rh factor simply mean that a person's blood has certain specific characteristics.

«It is inhumane and criminal for anyone to accuse another person as a witch simply because the person exhibits certain strange behaviours.»

Only God knows, for some time there seems to be deliberate attempts by certain elements to harass and intimidate President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan without any justification simply because he does not belong to a certain part of this country where the people believe it is their absolute right to rule because they are in the majority without having regard to the fact that the world is changing fast.

The talk is of «peak stuff»: that beyond a certain level of economic development, people simply stop consuming so much.

Punit Shah from the MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry (SGDP) Centre at King's College London, said: «There is ample evidence for optimism bias in various real - world situations — England football fans for example — but these instances simply show that certain people might be optimistic in certain situations; not that they are generally optimistic.»

However, what's absolutely certain is that the majority of people simply don't care about having a six - pack and there's nothing wrong with that.

Her techniques and food are designed as nourishment, not deprivation, but she recognizes that certain foods simply don't agree with certain people.

How can a person simply NOT LIKE certain foods that were yummy to me?

You've probably seen articles about how most people are deficient in certain nutrients, and how you simply can't afford to eat any «empty calories.»

Even though a certain type of people can endure the arduous dieting process only by the strength of their willpower, the majority has it a lot harder and quite simply do not possess the strength of mind.

People with dementia, just like anyone else, have their challenges and moods, and on certain days yoga is simply not in their plan.

Throughout the centuries, people have accepted certain things to be absolute, undeniable truth, when in fact, many times those «truths» are simply myths or misperception.

Then again at a certain point people simply talk past each other and no rational dialectic can be entered into.

Those are important for moving big weight and being strong enough to handle anything life throws at you, but real shoulder function — pain - free, unimpeded shoulder function — depends on certain supporting muscles and joints of which most people are simply unaware.

Sometimes, that's just simply not the case for certain people.

For example, if you look at the progress made by people who have lost incredible amounts of weight you will undoubtedly see that they did not succeed by losing a certain amount of weight each and every week for months or years because the human body is simply not made that way and most people who start a weight reduction program find that it is far from a consistent process.