First, except possibly for
certain scientific purposes, power as commonly understood is seldom defined as the capacity to suffer or undergo an effect.
Not exact matches
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely
certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our
purposes; the idea that the so - called
scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
The laws of nature discovered by scientists are a consequence of applying
certain canons of inquiry, adopted by the
scientific community, for the
purpose of creating a consistent and reliable organization of sense experience.
They were composed not by historians, with what we like to call
scientific detachment, but by Christian preachers and teachers, and for
certain practical
purposes.
School districts in some states, including all five surveyed, may have additional protection under «recreational use» statutes, which offer immunity from
certain claims against landowners who open their property to the public for recreational use.10 In states with broad recreational use statutes, such as Indiana, opening school kitchen facilities could be considered a protected activity under the law, depending on the circumstances of the use and other factors.11 However, in Massachusetts, protection for recreational activities extends only to
purposes that are «
scientific, educational, environmental, ecological, research, religious, or charitable,» 12 so the state's statute might not apply when districts allow for - profit groups to use school kitchens.
That would be pure products with time and time again proven
certain qualities by serious
scientific researches without any fancy, commercial names — BCAA (branched chain amino acids), l - glutamine, protein, high carbs weight gainers, creatine monohydrate, l - carnitine, ZMA (zinc, magnesium and B6 formula), multivitamins and minerals and other pure products with clear
purposes.
Personally I am against commercial whaling but if you want an impartial view I think the taking of whales should not be allowed under the
scientific research provision; instead the ability to take for commercial
purposes certain whale species that are doing ok (e.g., minke) should be rediscussed within the IWC (again I am not in favor of this but it would better then killing for
scientific research whale species that are endangered [eg, fin, sei whales].
Protestors Defending Whales from «
Scientific Research» The Japanese claim that they are able to hunt a certain number of whales for «scientific purposes» and that the activists» behavior is
Scientific Research» The Japanese claim that they are able to hunt a
certain number of whales for «
scientific purposes» and that the activists» behavior is
scientific purposes» and that the activists» behavior is criminal.
batch of criminal appeals [relating] to the involuntary administration of
certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the
purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases.
I would like to study the audio patterns of
certain recordings on YouTube for
scientific purposes, but don't want to violate their terms of service or any laws.