ESSA requires state accountability systems to annually measure five indicators that assess progress toward the state's long - term educational goals, with a particular focus on
certain student subgroups: those who are economically disadvantaged, minorities, children with disabilities, and English language learners.
Allows elementary and middle schools to earn additional points in its accountability system for accelerating student achievement, including increasing student performance in math, decreasing the number of minimally proficient students, improving the performance of
certain student subgroups and / or using an inclusion model for special education.
While, overall, SOL scores at year - round schools were similar to scores in traditional calendar schools, SOL scores of
certain student subgroups were more likely to improve at a faster rate at year - round schools.
Not exact matches
Under the law, schools must show not only that their overall
student body is making «adequate yearly progress» on state tests, but also that a sufficient percentage of
certain subgroups of
students are likewise proficient.
Over time we expect more and more schools to succeed with the majority of their
students, but to struggle with
certain extra-needy
subgroups.
[The Delaware Department of Education] proposes to decrease the percentage of non-proficient
students in each
subgroup by 50 % by 2030, which would result in no more than half to two - third of
certain subgroups of
students achieving proficiency.
To make adequate yearly progress, or AYP, under the federal law, schools and districts must meet annual targets for the percentage of
students who score at least at the proficient level on state reading and mathematics tests, both for the
student population as a whole and for
certain subgroups of
students.
Additionally, although the results by
subgroup help illustrate this phenomenon, it's almost
certain that just because an individual
student falls within a
certain subgroup, it does not mean that we can predict that
student's results in Teach to One.
This shift in focus creates a problem for
certain subgroups, such as
students with limited English proficiency or
students from racial or ethnic backgrounds, because these individuals are frequently the ones on the lower grid of the achievement gap.
For example, the underrepresented
students or
certain subgroups which would normally cause a school to miss AYP will not count against the school in the same fashion because the school as a whole would appear to perform better than a school with a larger
subgroup population not making AYP.
The federal one looks at the performance of
certain «
subgroups» of kids: minorities, poor
students, youngsters with disabilities and those still learning English.
ESSA maintains a strong focus on accountability and requires all states to have in place systems of accountability and supports that include annual accountability determinations for all public schools based on multiple indicators for the school overall and for
certain subgroups of
students.