Sentences with phrase «certain years temperature»

«In certain years temperature became a very strong influence.

Not exact matches

Hoegh - Guldberg said scientific consensus was that hikes in carbon dioxide and the average global temperature were «almost certain to destroy the coral communities of the Great Barrier Reef for hundreds if not thousands of years».

Based on modeling results by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which predicted that Pacific Ocean temperatures would rise by 1 degree Celsius (2 degrees Fahrenheit) over the next 50 years, a Canadian and U.S. team of scientists examined the distributional changes of 28 species of fish including salmon, herring, certain species of sharks, anchovies, sardines and more northern fish like pollock.

In just the past few years, strains of Escherichia coli have emerged that can thrive in salted foods like sausage or acidic foods such as apple juice, and certain strains of Salmonella have developed the ability to resist food - processing temperatures that kill other organisms.

It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the warmest year on record, with one of the strongest El Niños ever recorded combining with manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.

If you measure the temperature from a certain place, such as Los Angeles, the development of the past 200 years has made the city much warmer because of all the buildings and roads absorbing solar energy — and naturally the temperature trend is upwards.

It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the warmest year on record, with one of the strongest El Ninos ever recorded combining with manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.

Last year, hundreds of flights were canceled because planes can not take off in weather above a certain temperature because hot air is too thin to support a safe takeoff.

Certain breeds (such as the brachiocephalic French Bulldog) have travel restrictions, in addition to heat and temperature requirements that prevent travel during some parts of the year.

The year round warm temperatures and the history and culture of Costa Rica have created a certain harmony that is not fast.

If you measure the temperature from a certain place, such as Los Angeles, the development of the past 200 years has made the city much warmer because of all the buildings and roads absorbing solar energy — and naturally the temperature trend is upwards.

I doubt very much we have ever said we know for certain that temperatures are higher now than 1000 years ago.

If a certain month had a temperature anomaly the same as one back in 1995, there can not have been any global warming in 20 years, can there.

In some rough order of certainty we can consider that the 11 year solar cycle impacts on the following are well accepted: stratospheric ozone, cosmogenic isotope production, upper atmospheric geopotential heights, stratospheric temperatures and (slightly less certain and with small magnitudes ~ 0.1 deg C) tropospheric and ocean temperatures.

In other words, after the immediate increase in temperature caused by a doubling of CO ₂ over 70 years, would the temperature necessarily continue to increase a certain (large or small) amount or could the more slowly acting feedbacks cause it to drop back in the longer term?

Given that 1985 was the last year with temperatures below the 20th century average, and 2000 - 2010 was the hottest decade on record, it has become impossible to say for certain that any given storm is free from the influence of our warmed world.

What scientists once thought was a fairly simple linear process — that is, a certain amount at the surface of an ice sheet melts each year, depending on the temperature — is now seen to be much more complicated.

2014 and 2015 each set the record for hottest calendar year since we began measuring surface temperatures over 150 years ago, and 2016 is almost certain to break the record once again.

While the conditions in the geological past are useful indicators in suggesting climate and atmospheric conditions only vary within a a certain range (for example, that life has existed for over 3 billion years indicates that the oxygen level of the atmosphere has stayed between about 20 and 25 % throughout that time), I also think some skeptics are too quick to suggest the lack of correlation between temperature and CO2 during the last 550 million years falsifies the link between CO2 and warming (too many differences in conditions to allow any such a conclusion to be drawn — for example the Ordovician with high CO2 and an ice age didn't have any terrestrial life).

2) Soil moisture: memory in soil moisture can last several weeks which can influence the atmosphere through changes in evaporation and surface energy budget and can affect the forecast of air temperature and precipitation in certain areas during certain times of the year on intraseasonal time scales;

In recent years, scientific evidence has solidified around central findings, showing that sea level rise is likely to be far more severe during the rest of this century than initially anticipated, and that key temperature thresholds may be crossed that make life difficult for some kinds of plants and animals to survive in certain places.

The planet reaches an essential equilibrium during these periods in that it reaches a certain temperature range for 10,000 or 20,000 years and does not continue the warming it did to rise out of the glacial period.

As others have noted, the IPCC Team has gone absolutely feral about Salby's research and the most recent paper by Dr Roy Spencer, at the University of Alabama (On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth's Radiant Energy Balance), for one simple reason: both are based on empirical, undoctored satellite observations, which, depending on the measure required, now extend into the past by up to 32 years, i.e. long enough to begin evaluating real climate trends; whereas much of the Team's science in AR4 (2007) is based on primitive climate models generated from primitive and potentially unreliable land measurements and proxies, which have been «filtered» to achieve certain artificial realities (There are other more scathing descriptions of this process I won't use).

To say «the Planet» or «the Globe» or «the Earth» has been cooling over the past 15 years or even holding steady in temperatures is not factually correct, and saying it is, both obscures the true scientific facts, and wittingly or unwittingly, serves certain political interests.

It's worth reflecting on the number of scientists who are certain about what the temperature trend will be in a 100 years, yet in 2001 were unable to predict what would happen in the next six.

It's not very good for saying «in 2050, the temperature will be X», but it is useful for determining what range the average temperature is likely to be within over, say, a 30 - year period centered on the date in question (with much uncertainty) given certain starting conditions and certain inputs and changes in forcing over time, and.

Is it possible that a few of the warmest years in the validation are big misses, suggesting that the methodology is only valid up to a certain temperature and not above?

lolwot — people with an agricultural background point out that northern latitude areas that can not grow certain temperature sensitive crops today, whereas in past years, such as the MWP, the same crops could be grown in those areas disprove Mann's hockey stick temperature reconstruction.

For instance, ground source heat pumps tend to have higher efficiencies than air source units during the heating season due to the relative stability of ground temperatures below certain depths, though air source units — which involve much lower capital costs — have closed the gap in recent years as manufacturers have refined their design, and there is evidence to indicate that space heating demand in many Irish buildings may be peaking in Ireland's frequently relatively mild but windy weather, as the guide to air source heat pumps in Issue 24 of Passive House Plus discussed.

It is likely that global temperature for calendar year 2010 will exceed the 2005 record, but that is not certain if a deep La Nina develops quickly.

We had written about it the year before, in one of the first papers on the divergence problem — I think other groups had actually called it the divergence problem — and, since then, we have been working with other tree ring data trying to improve the way we process the data to try and make sure we keep as much of the low frequency information on longer timescales in the trees because you have to standardise trees in a certain way to produce temperature reconstructions.

The scientific consensus has concluded that further increases in CO2 and average global temperature are almost certain to destroy the coral communities of the Great Barrier Reef for hundreds if not thousands of years.

One should not ask a climate model if it's going to rain, or what the temperature is going to be on a certain day or month 10 years from now.

The temperature varied from year to year, or decade to decade, but stayed within a certain range and averaged out to an approximately steady level.»

I seem to remember an incident a couple of years ago where certain stations in Finland and Russia reported the same temperature data in consecutive months.

Also, RGB at Duke would scold R.Gates for making the «schtick» «First, the climate now is not warmer than it was in the Holocene Optimum (do not make the mistake of conflating the high frequency, high resolution «2004 ″ data point with the smoothed low frequency, low resolution data in the curve — even the figure's caption warns against doing that — for the very good reason that in every 300 year smoothed upswing it is statistically certain that the upswing involved multidecadal intervals of temperatures much higher than the running mean.

And in spite of being compatible with certain alarmist positions, the IPCC conclusions do not support a major anthropogenic attribution to temperature changes prior to ~ 30 years ago.

ZERO change for 15 consecutive years and the IPCC says that they're 97.5 % certain that we humans are to blame for a non-rise in temperature.

Climate, sometimes understood as the «average weather,» is defined as the measurement of the mean and variability of relevant quantities of certain variables (such as temperature, precipitation or wind) over a period of time, ranging from months to thousands or millions of years.

Significant temperature changes are almost certain to occur by the year 2000 and these could bring about climatic changes.

In this chart, we can see that keeping a battery at a certain charge and at a certain temperature over the course of a year can significantly diminish its overall capacity.