Sentences with phrase «certainly as biased»

This is certainly as biased via lack of information as the proposal as it now stands.

Not exact matches

This agreement can not be dismissed as the mere bias of philosophers for it is certainly reflected in common morality as well.

(We can debate to what extent «East Coast bias» is a thing in the media, but it's certainly true that people on the Eastern half of the country aren't as broadly familiar with teams like Washington as, say, Georgia.)

Your sources also prevent a very biased picture, the bit about pay - as - you - go pensions simply makes no sense on a macroeconomic level and the Dutch system at least is certainly not based mostly on this (and, in fact, very similar to the structure of the Danish and Finnish systems described in this article).

Ok I am biased as a Green Party member but I am not convinced that the Labour Party is democratic enough for members to have any real say and I certainly feel that the Labour left has wilted.

«We from the very onset knew the committee will certainly do a biased job and they have proved as right.

And Gould was certainly right that all scientists, as humans, have some sort of bias.

I for one would certainly defend separate clinical trials for statutory approval as well as for better understanding of new pharmaceutical products, given the bias which inevitably enters into these trials.

«Certainly, there?s a geographical bias in the survey as well: People prefer places like Berlin and Munich, which don?t only offer high - quality research institutes, but cultural value as well.»

It is certainly likely that some of the disparities are being driven by the bias of teachers and principals, implicit or otherwise, as some studies suggest.

I also should note that researchers in this study clearly conducted this study with similar a priori conclusions in mind (i.e., that the Common Core should be saved / promoted); hence, future peer review of this piece may be out of the question as the bias evident in the sets of findings would certainly be a «methodological issue,» again, likely preventing a peer - reviewed publication (see, for example, the a priori conclusion that «[this] study highlights an important advantage of having a common set of standards and assessments across multiple states,» in the abstract (p. 3).

I have my own biases — I'm an android fan — but I do see where Apple has its niche as a «toy» company in that they the people who buy its products certainly don't do it for specs.

In my 40 years as a scientist, I have certainly seen some of my colleagues, acting in their role as normal human beings, occasionally get carried away in their enthusiasm and let nons - cientific biases affect the way they represent their scientific judgment to the public.

At the time, we reported that this would certainly be taken into account in revisions of data set as more data was processed and better classifications of the various observational biases occurred.

So the SET of scenarios does certainly not encompass all the possibilities of the future — it is strongly biased as a whole.

You'd have to do things like disprove CO2's role in the atmosphere and you can't do that with simple essays, you'd have to actually publish some science, so you have to turn bemoaning about «bias», as if you would know (and you certainly wouldn't).

Dan is heavily at odds with quite a few members of the group that you (vaguely) describe as the «calamitous climate change culture,» yet not only do you place him into that group (without specifying how or why), you even go so far as to, with complete certainly, explain a causal mechanism behind a putative bias in his work on the basis of his strong identification with that group.

It doesn't disappear, as it is theoretically possible that someone is bias - free, and certainly some are closer to that state than others.

This type of bias certainly exists throughout the Global Historical Climate Network, as well as what Anthony has documented for the US Historical Climate Reference Network.»

Please note, questioning the existence of motivated reasoning is not the same as questioning motivation And certainly it is logical to question the potential for motivated reasoning from those who are support «conventional wisdom» --(which in contrast to the potential of your own biases — you seem willing to offer as the operational rationale for the reaction among those who disagree with your findings).

If we consider the IPCC technical papers as the gold standard of science (and certainly the IPCC can not be considered as skeptic biased), then it would appear that science can't answer these questions to the extent of demonstrating that calamity is certain.

Certainly, my information about the response by the profession was partial and probably biased, but the reaction of the climate / temperature profession to the CRU emails as a whole did not bolster my confidence in it.

I love all tech and are certainly critical but this site is as biased as it gets...... sad more than maddening.