For instance, if a hypothesis about what a part of the brain is doing turns out to inspire a working technology, that
certainly gives the hypothesis a boost.
Not exact matches
«However,
given the extremely high consumption of sugar in the West, we will
certainly be investigating this
hypothesis further with some urgency.»
This is only an association study and can not prove it, but
certainly an interesting
hypothesis given what else we know about vinegar.
Before that I had read science fiction novels and seen a couple of movies that predicted warming and melting... But anyway, after the cooling
hypothesis came out (it
certainly wasn't impossible
given that ice ages were cyclic), I decided to naively think up a mitigation strategy.
The CAGW
hypothesis qualifies as dogma
given the ongoing assertion that the science is «settled» in the face of gross uncertainties, and that nearly all defense of CAGW by its proponents tends to be from an «appeal to authority» position (
certainly my experience at RealClimate).
Since a basic North American continental experiment was already successfully executed on the few post 911 clear sky days, I posit that simple solar L1 irradiance modification experiments could be designed to test the
hypothesis without any serious side effects (
certainly without moving an asteroid) to successfully obtain the desired data to enable more permanent temporary solutions, and in order to
give us more time to develop the necessary carbon dioxide removal and sequestration schemes — aka carbon containing products).