There are those who live with
the certainty of right and wrong — what is true or false, black or white.
Not exact matches
«Where standards
of right and wrong are asserted with dogmatic
certainty and are not open to discussion,
and, even worse, where these standards merely express the interests
of the stronger party in a relationship while clothing those interests in moralistic language, then that criticism is indeed justified» (p. 140).
But it seems that we have often gone one step further: we justify our own confusion by being suspicious
of any
certainty,
and we interpret the lack
of easy answers to mean that any answer is as good as another, that we can not be sure about
right and wrong.
Would it really bring greater satisfaction if absolute
certainty could be introduced or would it actually take away the great enjoyment that football fans obviously get from the argument
and the discussion about the
rights and wrongs of decisions on which individual games, cups
and championships turn?