Not exact matches
Scientists individually may hold positions they wont yield on, but SCIENCE inherently
accepts challenges to
dogma
A pioneer of post-minimalism, feminist, and video art, Lynda Benglis rose to prominence in the early 1970s, and has since become known for her aggressively confrontational
challenges to
accepted social and aesthetic
dogmas.
I propose doing so, in
challenging what he states as
accepted dogma: that any time - series less than 25 or 30 years is meaningless.
Much like religious fundamantalists, credulous CAGW truebelievers like Joshua comfort themselves by idly
accepting Team / IPCC
dogma, book, line and sinker, and
challenging skeptics to come up with different numbers.
If you can't
accept challenges to The Science, a priori — however well or poorly conceived those
challenges are — it's not unfair to wonder if The Science is in fact merely
dogma, and you a zealot.
Such
dogmas have been hallowed by repetition over years and unthinkingly
accepted by courts and clinicians alike following the rarely
challenged opinions proffered in court by some experts.