If I created a think tank whose only purpose is to
challenge climate change theories not because I don't think climate change doesn't exist, but because I want to improve the scientific field, would my think tank be considered part of CCCM?
Not exact matches
While those who stand in denial of
climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that
challenges the
theory and evidence of human - induced
climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported expert saying that
climate change was not happening — or might actually be a good thing.
Then comes another big lie - «those who stand in denial of
climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that
challenges the
theory ``.
Treating
climate change as an absolute, unassailable fact, instead of what it is — an unproven, controversial scientific
theory — a group of state attorneys general have announced that they will be targeting any companies that
challenge the catastrophic
climate change religion.
We would agree that
climate change raises some civilization
challenging ethical questions about which different respectable ethical
theories might reach different conclusions about what should be done.
In this article, I present a neoclassical realist
theory of
climate change politics that
challenges the idea that cooperation on
climate change is compelled alone by shared norms and interests emanating from the international level and questions if instead [continue reading...]