Sentences with phrase «challenged by the climate science»

The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well - respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.

The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well - respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.

Not exact matches

The challenges that we face with that ever - increasing population with regards to climate change, food and water availability, sustainability — those problems are going to be solved by science, and they're going to be solved by the kids today.

But the senators challenged statements by Exxon spokesman Ken Cohen that the company has conducted «climate science... in an open and transparent way.»

That distrust has been vindicated by revelations of dodgy uses of data and collusion to prevent the publication of studies challenging the climate science consensus.

The New York Academy of Sciences Environmental Sciences Section and Green Science and Sustainability Program, the Sallan Foundation and the New York League of Conservation Voters Education Fund will host an address by a senior member of Governor Spitzer's team about his strategic approach to the environmental, energy and climate challenges facing New York.

«We need our young people today to embrace science enthusiastically, to realise that challenges like climate change can only be beaten by motivated and dedicated scientists,» he told the Royal Society in Oxford this morning.

«Certainly science diplomacy is essential for addressing the global challenges of hunger, energy, climate, and other areas detailed in the Sustainable Development Goals approved last year by the United Nations.»

This year's session included many interesting presentations including «Climate Action Plan Challenge for Librarians: Supporting Sound Science to Manage Climate Impacts» by Frederick Stoss, Science Librarian from the University at Buffalo.

U.S. geoscientists are accustomed to being used as a punching bag by climate change skeptics in Congress, who challenge the science of global warming.

The deal poses a fundamental challenge to climate science, because it is difficult to work out whether trends and events are caused by greenhouse gases or would have happened anyway.

There is a small minority, including people like Gene Koprowski, marketing director at the Heartland Institute, which has consistently produced research challenging the science behind climate change, who have called into question the pope's wisdom in taking up the issue, even suggesting that he was inspired by «pagan remnants.»

«Leveraging a digital control mechanism means we can give value to the millions of observations collected by volunteers» and «it allows a new kind of science where citizens can directly contribute to the analysis of global challenges like climate change» say Hamed Mehdipoor and Dr. Raul Zurita - Milla, who work at the Geo - Information Processing department of ITC.

Perry also endorsed the idea — first floated in a different form by physicist and former DOE official Steve Koonin — of forming a «red team» of climate science doubters to challenge a «blue team» of mainstream researchers, in order to publicly hash out the issues and «get the politics out of it.»

To meet this societal need, the world climate research community is challenged by underlying science questions and the quality and coverage of the observational data that are used to monitor and understand extremes.

The paper suggests that these physicists joined the environmental backlash to stem changing tides in science and society, and to defend their preferred understandings of science, modernity, and of themselves as a physicist elite — understandings challenged by on - going transformations encapsulated by the widespread concern about human - induced climate change.

Chapter 3 is by Naomi Oresekes and Erik Conway, «Challenging Knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the cold war.»

I propose that the climate science is still not matured to the degree where it can judge total effect of any of the exclusions: it follows that credibility of above can and will be successively challenged, not by myself (lacking adequate competency), the sceptics, the deniers, etc., but followers of what the science should be, independent unbiased and fully credible.

Following the all - too - familiar pattern, this deeply flawed paper was heavily promoted by special interests as somehow challenging the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate (an excellent account is provided by science journalist Dan Vergano of USA Today here).

The point is that most basic science pursues questions generated by basic science and judged by those same scientists, a path - dependent approach that has disconnected itself from the challenges and opportunities — the many small but very real problems associated with developing effective, scalable solutions to climate change.

But the newly obtained documents show that Dr. Carlin's highly skeptical views on global warming, which have been known for more than a decade within the small unit where he works, have been repeatedly challenged by scientists inside and outside the E.P.A.; that he holds a doctorate in economics, not in atmospheric science or climatology; that he has never been assigned to work on climate change; and that his comments on the endangerment finding were a product of rushed and at times shoddy scholarship, as he acknowledged Thursday in an interview.

The centerpiece of the article was Dr. Holdren's description of the evolving arguments put forward by public figures, including some scientists, challenging climate science as they fight restrictions on greenhouse gases:

Through relentless pressure on the media to present the issue «objectively,» and by challenging the consensus on climate change science by misstating both the nature of what «consensus» means and what this particular consensus is, ExxonMobil and its allies have confused the public and given cover to a few senior elected and appointed government officials whose positions and opinions enable them to damage U.S. credibility abroad.

Lindzen writes this after Democratic lawmakers launched an investigation into energy industry funding of climate science, looking to discredit scientists whose research challenges the underlying reasons for C02 - reducing policies championed by the Obama administration.

In 1998, it joined the American Petroleum Institute's plan to challenge climate science by creating new «experts» to counter the scientific consensus.

Climate change presents a profound challenge to this cautious centrism because half measures won't cut it: «all of the above energy» programs, as U.S. President Barack Obama describes his approach, has about as much chance of success as an all of the above diet, and the firm deadlines imposed by science require that we get very worked up indeed.

«Evaporation» is the second in the annual Cape Farewell «Lovelock Art Commission» - inspired by the findings, writings and interventions of the famous scientist James Lovelock, as we continue to commission artists who pioneer the vital dialogue between science, art and the climate challenge.

Climate Science Watch: Climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate Climate Science Watch: Climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate Science Watch: Climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate Climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate climate change.

The critical missing piece of information here is that science related to climate change is much more robust than what can be challenged by excerpts from a few private emails (of hundreds) stolen from a server.

Martin Manning talks about some of the challenges faced by the IPCC and its scientists from his perspective as head of the Support Team for the IPCC Working Group I (Science of Climate Change) for the Fourth Assessment Report, released in 2007.

«U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is leading a formal initiative to challenge mainstream climate science using a «back - and - forth critique» by government - recruited experts, according to a senior administration official.

This means that even if the IPCC was found to be run by a small group of mentally - challenged llamas, this wouldn't affect the science on human - caused climate change.

These changes are not the consequence of a successful challenge to climate science in an open, technical debate, but to errors in procedure exposed by the media's appetite for scandal.

Because cutting GHG emissions requires interventions — such as regulation or increased taxation — that interfere with laissez - faire free - market economics, people whose identity and worldview centers around free markets are particularly challenged by the findings from climate science.

So while sceptics have attempted to challenge climate politics by questioning climate science and the over-statement of its consequences, this approach leaves the political character of environmentalism unchallenged.

The study by Heartland Institute, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) says «mankind will be much better off in the year 2100 than it is today and therefore able to adapt to whatever challenges climate change presents.»

The IPCC is continuing its tradition of fraudulent bogus climate science for the 2013 climate report by utilizing Climategate - style scientists that excel in global warming fabrication and suppressing research that challenges the blatant fabrication.

Writing in the journal Science, an international team of scientists argue that the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation (RED) initiative, launched in 2005 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, is scientifically and technologically sound, and that political and economic challenges facing the plan can be overcome.

I want to challenge the news media to reverse course and report on the objective science of climate change, stop ignoring legitimate voices in this scientific debate, and stop being used by the hysterical left,» said Inhofe.

> Rick Piltz > Director, Climate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrClimate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrScience Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrClimate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrScience Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrclimate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrscience and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrclimate disruption.

Robert Balling was one of the seven scientists deployed by Western Fuels in the 1990s to challenge the prevailing consensus in climate science.

«Friends of Science Report «Why Renewable Energy Can not Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050» Will Shock Green Investors and Challenges the Grantham Climate Change Risk Scenario,» PRWeb, June 9, 2016.

«Friends of Science New Report Challenges claims by Canadian Scholars on Climate Change Policy and Power Generation in Advance of Climate Confab in Quebec,» PRWeb, April 7, 2015.

He is the person who got into bed with Mr. Littlemore's boss at a PR [public relations] company, a Mr. James Haugen (LOVELY IMAGERY HERE, VISCOUNT; JOHN AND JIM WENT TO HIGH SCHOOL TOGETHER), and they took up the DeSmog Blog, whose job of course is not to debate the science of climate, but to inaccurately misrepresent the alleged or supposed or imagined funding of anyone who dares to challenge the supposed consensus on the climate (INACCURATELY MISREPRESENT THE ALLEGED OR SUPPOSED OR IMAGINED FUNDING??? YET MONCKTON DOES N'T DENY HIS OWN CONNECTION TO A SPPINSTITUTE CREATED BY EXXON MOBIL.

This insight, backed by the palaeo - climatic record (see Chapter 2, Section 2.4), is a new challenge for global change science because now thresholds have to be identified and their values need to be estimated using the entire hierarchy of climate models.

On December 11, Rep. Jay Inslee (D - WA), Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (R - MD), and 22 House co-signers sent a letter to William Brennan of NOAA, the Acting Director of the Climate Change Science Program, in which they say: «The failure of the CCSP to produce a National Assessment report within the time frame required by law has made it more difficult for Congress to develop a comprehensive policy response to the challenge of global climate change.Climate Change Science Program, in which they say: «The failure of the CCSP to produce a National Assessment report within the time frame required by law has made it more difficult for Congress to develop a comprehensive policy response to the challenge of global climate change.climate change.»

A paper in the peer - reviewed journal Climate Dynamics — by Professor Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Dr Marcia Wyatt — amounts to a stunning challenge to climate science ortClimate Dynamics — by Professor Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Dr Marcia Wyatt — amounts to a stunning challenge to climate science ortclimate science orthodoxy.

Sadly much of the «science» practiced by climate scientists isn't even falsifiable, yet we expected to believe that it's «settled», that there is no need for it to be challenged because it is the «consensus».

By any account, it's been a challenging 12 months for climate science, for climate scientists, and for the ever - changing face of journalism as its practitioners struggle, or not, to keep their audiences adequately informed and knowledgeable.

In 2007, science teachers said their greatest challenge was making climate change fit in with their curriculum, according to a survey by the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, a joint project of NOAA and the University of Colorado at Boulder.