As a veteran journalist for several Washington, D.C. newspapers, I've interviewed more than 100 victims (by actual count) of ethically -
challenged climate change believers protecting their income, in - group status, or warped personality maintenance innards who routinely attack dissenters with the same error - ridden stock accusations without the slightest idea what the dissenter actually did or said.
Not exact matches
Fortunately, he and other conservative Christians are being
challenged by
climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who also happens to be an evangelical Christian on a crusade to demonstrate to her fellow
believers why being a Christian is not in conflict with accepting
climate change.
Maybe it's because of the huge success on the Amazon Best - Seller lists of popular books debunking
climate hysteria that true
believers insist that «there is no peer - reviewed science
challenging the consensus on
climate change».
What we should take away from the whole sorry episode is that this zeal for
challenging the character of
climate -
change skeptics — while excusing both the political / financial connections, and sloppy science, of true
believers because their cause is supposedly noble — represents the final degeneration of the global warming movement into pure politics.