Without a doubt, the meetings with my baby - boomer assistant, daily
conversations with my Gen - X boss and other interactions with clients and colleagues taught me and
challenged me more than I could have ever imagined after spending most of the previous four years around people my age.
The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument, as a
challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment
without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering
conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.
Without casting every
challenge as a political battle or focusing on apocalyptic visions of a despoiled planet, Alex Steffen, first with Jamais Cascio and then a global community of contributors, built a
conversation around designing a human future that could work for the long haul.