Not exact matches
Our credit report repair services include, but are not limited to, unlimited deletions of negative
items,
challenge of inquiries and duplicate personal information (other companies won't do this), unlimited communication with our paralegals (you will always talk to a live person, never a recording), original
dispute letters (no generic plug - ins) and personal coaching to educate you in credit matters.
If a consumer believes an
item of information on their credit report is inaccurate or incomplete, they may
challenge, or
dispute the
item.
They manage the
dispute process for you and follow up to ensure that successfully
challenged items are actually removed from your credit report.
Your 90 - Day Action Plan will include the specific
items that need to be
disputed (and why) to achieve your credit score goals, the
dispute letters to
challenge them; the accounts that may need to be settled, balances reduced, or negotiated for Pay - to - Delete; and specific accounts to add to your credit profile — with instructions on how to use them — to begin rebuilding your credit scores with the right products.
A debt validation program
challenges the debt collection company — sending out more than 30 pages of
disputes... where line by line different
items are being requested.
Ovation will send an unlimited number of custom validation
dispute letters to the creditors you choose
challenging the validity of the questionable
items you are
disputing.
If the creditor attached to your
challenged item does not have evidence or does not take the time to respond to your
dispute, the
item must be removed from your report.
Typically, the credit repair service organization sends out
dispute letters to
challenge the accuracy / validity of negative
items.
Once we receive your report with the
disputes we will start the credit repair process, drawing upon our vast arsenal of credit report repair strategies to
challenge questionable
items directly with the credit bureaus.
Lamb's recent client successes include securing a dismissal on behalf of the board of a publicly traded company of three shareholder derivative and class action complaints in Ohio and Texas
challenging the fairness of a $ 2.5 billion merger transaction and prevailing in an arbitration involving a
dispute over the proper accounting treatment of certain
items in connection with another client's purchase of a business.