Sentences with phrase «chambers judge ordered»

The chambers judge ordered that the issues relating to the renovation project fee and the cancellation fee be determined by way of a special case under Rule 9 - 3.

In June 2016, a chambers judge ordered that the children should be returned to England, with such order stayed until they completed the school year in Calgary.

Initially, the Chambers judge ordered the the mother to have full child custody of the children and the children were to have supervised parenting time with the father on the weekends.

Not exact matches

The judge cited points of order raised in the Commons chamber yesterday afternoon by shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman.

Each year, the Assembly gets $ 85 million to play with (with not an iota of oversight, the Times reports), and, under a judge's order, the chamber has grudgingly disclosed the full list of lawmakers» constituent - pleasing local initiatives.

Sub-section 2 goes further to state: «An order made under sub-section (1) of this section shall be published in the official gazette, in two national newspapers and at such other places as the judge in chambers may determine.»

The judge also held that the issuance of the proscription order by him in the chambers following an ex parte application was in accordance with the provisions of the Terrorism Prevention Act.

The judge instead ordered the ethics board to deliver the documents Friday to his chamber in a sealed envelope.

I judged too quickly, thinking him one of those actors who prides himself on making the big bad movies in order to fund the small good ones — a kind of vanity tax upon the audience, whereby the pointless shoot -»em - up is the price we supposedly pay for the chilly little chamber piece about divorce.

In October 2007, federal district court Judge Robert Chambers ruled in favor of Gunnoe and OVEC and issued an injunction, ordering Jupiter Holdings to halt the construction of any new valley fills at its Boone County mine.

Since the Chambers Judge's order «would seem to prevent the Province from pursuing all enforcement remedies against [the Respondent], regardless of whether they relate to a specific court proceeding», the Court of Appeal agreed the order inappropriately restrained the lawful conduct of a government official and was, therefore, in the nature of an injunction against the Crown.

In this case, in the exercise of his discretion, the learned chambers judge, who was also the case management judge, decided that the interests of justice favoured disclosure and ordered that the clinics and doctors provide the representative plaintiff with the names and contact information of those individuals who were injected with Dermalive, a cosmetic filler, which is alleged to have caused granuloma, a medical condition.

As the Court of Appeal wrote, «the proof is in the pudding» — counsel for one of the Respondents calculated the lowest intermediate balance for each beneficiary (and the proportion each balance comprised) to the satisfaction of the Chambers Judge who signed the Order.

Chambers decision: The Chambers judge quashed the adjudicator's order, finding that «no adjudicator acting reasonably could have reached a decision in this case without considering the implications of the conflicts in the evidence on these critical points».

The chambers judge resisted and held that the evidence justified the order.

[28] Having properly taken jurisdiction and made the necessary findings about the children's status, in our view the chambers judge then ought to have ordered the necessary adjustment to the appellant's child support obligations by utilizing the appellant's actual Line 150 income information from employment, evidence that was available and uncontroverted.

The Chambers Judge concludes Ms. Craig's evidence is responsive to the letter of request; orders Ms. Craig to attend a deposition but allows Monster to ask her only one question (whether the affidavit is true).

A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) allowed the IPC's appeal (per Justices McLachlin CJ, LeBel, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein), reinstating the adjudicator's order and remitting the matter to the chambers judge to consider the issues that were not dealt with in the original judicial review.

In the recent Alberta Court of Appeal case of Kerslake v Kerslake, 2016 ABCA 150 (CanLII), a Chambers judge was found to have exceeded his authority in making a final order.

The chambers judge finds the return had been filed in time and ordered the Commissioner to assess the claim.

The chambers judge dismissed Mr. Khadr's habeas corpus application, but the C.A. allowed his appeal, granted his habeas corpus application and ordered his transfer to a provincial correctional facility.

On appeal, the Appellant submits the Chambers Judge erred by, inter alia, characterizing the termination order as a final award.

Despite its mootness, the Province advances the argument that the Court of Appeal should consider the issues on appeal so as to address the precedential value of the Chambers Judge's order and since other taxpayers will likely pursue the same interim remedy.

The Court of Appeal determines it is appropriate to hear and consider the Province's first ground of appeal (that because the Chambers Judge's order restrains the lawful conduct of a government official, it is in the nature of an injunction and thus not available pursuant to s. 11 of the Crown Proceeding Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 89), despite the fact that the matter is moot and the present appeal was conducted without an adversarial context.

On the affirming the chambers judge's refusal to order production from a non-party, the Court stated, «A chambers judge has a discretion to refuse production of documents that are of marginal relevance where other documents relevant to the same issue have already been produced: see Peter Scherle Holdings Ltd. v. Gibson Pass Resort Inc., 2007 BCSC 770.»

Second, the chambers judge in this case ordered that the child be returned to Billings, Montana; however, the return of the child was subject to the father fulfilling certain conditions, namely: pay child support to the mother, pay spousal support to the mother, pay the costs associated with the mother's and child's return to Montana, provide the mother with suitable transportation and insurance to return to Montana, and pay the first and last month's rent for the mother's accommodation in Billings.

Particularly in chambers applications, where no judge has time to absorb all the parties» digital polemics for an interim order, some further rules of court or evidence should be established to arrest the page count of affidavits on chambers applications.

The chambers judge's order was accordingly set aside.

Additionally, although orders for security for costs are discretionary in nature and usually entitled to deference, a panel of court in Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corporation recently reversed an order for security for costs because the chambers judge had «erred in principle in determining the justness of the order sought».

In order to receive this benefit, however, you must first receive permission from the Municipal Judge, City of Mont Belvieu Chambers court handling your violation when you call in or appear in court.

The Texas Education Agency allows Municipal Judge, City of Mont Belvieu Chambers drivers to attend a Municipal Judge, City of Mont Belvieu Chambers driver safety program, including the Municipal Judge, City of Mont Belvieu Chambers online defensive driving courses offered by Getdefensive.com, in order to have up to one traffic violation per year expunged from their Texas Department of Public Safety driving record.

If you would like to participate in a driver safety program to help lower your insurance costs, to remove a traffic violation from your Texas driving record or because you were ordered to do so by a Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers court, you should ask the Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers court overseeing your citation and they will be happy to provide you with a list of brick and mortar traffic schools in and around Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers when you call into discuss your citation.

In order to receive this benefit, however, you must first receive permission from the Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers court handling your violation when you call in or appear in court.

Also, if you have taken ten defensive driving programs and are back for your eleventh, a Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers court may feel that you need a different form of rehabilitation in order to improve your safe driving habits.

However, if you have taken a defensive driving course within the last 12 months or are uncertain when and if you last took defensive driving, you should order a copy of your Texas Driver Record and / or ask the Municipal Judge, City of Old River - Winfree Chambers traffic court to see if you are eligible to take our defensive driving course for ticket dismissal at this time.