On January 27, the Wall Street Journal published an op - ed on climate
change by the climate science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology.
The scientists went on: «On 27 January, the Wall Street Journal published an op - ed on climate
change by the climate science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology.
Not exact matches
Mashable's Senior Editor for
Science and Special Projects, Kevin Freedman, in «No, New York Mag: Climate change won't make the Earth uninhabitable by 2100» contrasts the story's gloom against hope and optimism, but mostly analyses the science beh
Science and Special Projects, Kevin Freedman, in «No, New York Mag:
Climate change won't make the Earth uninhabitable
by 2100» contrasts the story's gloom against hope and optimism, but mostly analyses the
science beh
science behind it.
In his book The World in 2050: Four Forces Shaping Civilization's Northern Future, Laurence Smith, a professor of geography and earth and space
sciences at UCLA, argues that we're about to see a productivity and culture boom in the north, driven
by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resources.
California Gov. Jerry Brown, whose state is currently being ravaged
by wildfires, said, «Scrapping the Clean Power Plan ignores sound
science and the extreme cost of
climate change.»
The challenges that we face with that ever - increasing population with regards to
climate change, food and water availability, sustainability — those problems are going to be solved
by science, and they're going to be solved
by the kids today.
The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks as the greenest community in Canada
by such pundits as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the
climate -
change - denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global warming
science is «not settled.»
Since taking leadership of the country last September, Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who in 2009 said the
science behind
climate change was «crap», has abolished the independent Climate Commission, the body created by the former Labor government to provide public information on the effects of global w
climate change was «crap», has abolished the independent
Climate Commission, the body created by the former Labor government to provide public information on the effects of global w
Climate Commission, the body created
by the former Labor government to provide public information on the effects of global warming.
She hopes to pursue a higher degree in Food
Science and Technology in the future so she can work towards mitigating problematic causes of
climate change, poor human health, and animal cruelty
by providing healthier and more sustainable plant - based food options.
James Painter is the head of the journalism fellowship programme at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, and is author of a recent RISJ study on
climate change and the media, called «Summoned
by Science».
Delaying infrastructure decisions is no longer simply inconvenient, it's a matter of life and death for people in countries most affected
by the adverse consequences of
climate change, Mr Clarke will claim in a debate to be held during the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Festival of Social
Science
The CIC will support Ghana's National
Climate Change Policy (NCCP), spearheaded
by the Ministry of Environment,
Science, Technology and Innovation.
«They didn't sign up for budget deficits... They didn't sign up for
science being pushed out of the way
by ideology... They didn't sign up for the denial of
climate change... They didn't sign up for North Korea getting nuclear weapons...»
The place of
climate change in
science education could fall
by the wayside.
«We need our young people today to embrace
science enthusiastically, to realise that challenges like
climate change can only be beaten
by motivated and dedicated scientists,» he told the Royal Society in Oxford this morning.
The letter comes on the eve of a House hearing on the legality of the subpoenas issued
by the House Committee on
Science, Space and Technology to Schneiderman's office over the investigation over whether major energy companies downplayed the risks of
climate change.
He has been a lifelong volunteer for causes he believes in, including conducting
climate change science field research with the Harvard Department of Forestry in Southern Africa, working on get - out - the - vote efforts for John Kerry, Barack Obama and Zephyr Teachout, building agricultural databases for USAID funded international projects all over the world, and providing technical assistance to schools in Senegal (for which he was awarded the President's Volunteer Service Award
by the Obama administration).
«For the sake of future generations who could be harmed
by irreversible
climate change, I urge New Yorkers to reject this fear mongering and uphold
science against ideology,» he said in a statement.
He also covered topics including clean energy - taking a dig at
climate change doubters
by suggesting his party «still believes in
science» - as well as renewing manufacturing, easing student loan debt
by allowing Americans to refinance them long - term, bringing more people into the workforce and providing equal pay.
«Northern domination of
science globally relevant to
climate change policy and practice and lack of research led
by Southern researchers in Southern countries may hinder development and implementation of bottom - up global agreements and nationally appropriate actions in Southern countries,» they write.
The Administration proposes to restructure the current
Climate and Land Use Change program, eliminating $ 11.1 million in climate research and development activities and reducing Interior's Climate Science Centers (CSCs) by $ 8.5 million, halving the number of regional CSCs from eight t
Climate and Land Use
Change program, eliminating $ 11.1 million in
climate research and development activities and reducing Interior's Climate Science Centers (CSCs) by $ 8.5 million, halving the number of regional CSCs from eight t
climate research and development activities and reducing Interior's
Climate Science Centers (CSCs) by $ 8.5 million, halving the number of regional CSCs from eight t
Climate Science Centers (CSCs)
by $ 8.5 million, halving the number of regional CSCs from eight to four.
The letter, which included a statement on
climate science by the leaders of 18 scientific societies, stated, «Although debate about policy options exists,
climate change is not a scientifically - controversial topic.»
Those differences can be caused
by people intent on misleading the public, like the organized campaigns to create doubt about the
science pointing to human - caused
climate change, she said.
«Rather than trying to assess the probability of an extreme event occurring, a group of researchers suggest viewing the event as a given and assessing to which degree
changes in the thermodynamic state (which we know has been influenced
by climate change) altered the severity of the impact of the event,» notes Dorit Hammerling, section leader for statistics and data
science at the Institute for Mathematics Applied to Geosciences, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
«A grandstand play, put on
by people who don't like Trump or the GOP, regardless, that has nothing to do with
climate change, alternative fuels or any other
science.
Seeing the vast areas affected
by climate change during this cruise has highlighted for me the importance of the
science I play a small role in.
Scientific consensus that humans cause
climate change is akin to the scientific consensus that smoking causes cancer, says a report released today
by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science.
McCarthy expressed hope that the report, coming from a trusted source — AAAS publishes the prestigious journal
Science — and written
by a group of esteemed American
climate scientists, would get across the message that 97 percent of
climate scientists are in agreement and that early action is needed on
climate change.
reported in the journal «
Science», scientists led
by Dr. Felix Creutzig from the Mercator Research Institute of Global Commons and
Climate Change (MCC), Berlin, and Dr. Patrick Jochem, KIT, point out that the transportation sector may be easier to decarbonize than previously assumed in global emission scenarios.
His startup kitty included $ 150,000 from a foundation started
by oil billionaire Charles Koch that has supported efforts opposing mainstream
climate change science.
And
by carefully measuring and modeling the resulting
changes in atmospheric composition, scientists could improve their estimate of how sensitive Earth's
climate is to CO2, said lead author Joyce Penner, a professor of atmospheric
science at the University of Michigan whose work focuses on improving global
climate models and their ability to model the interplay between clouds and aerosol particles.
«The
climate is
changing at a pace and in a pattern that is not explainable
by natural influences,» said John P. Holdren, assistant to the president for
science and technology and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology
science and technology and director of the White House Office of
Science and Technology
Science and Technology Policy.
A surrogate debate on
climate change was held in Washington, D.C., this week
by an independent organization advocating for
science - related dialogue
by candidates for office
«The West and Southwest are likely to become drier, while the eastern United States is likely to experience increased rainfall,» says the report, which was put out
by the U.S.
Climate Change Science Program, coordinated
by the White House.
The effort is the brainchild of two retirees frustrated
by what they see as the orthodoxy of «settled
science» on
climate change.
Lawyer Philip Cooney, a CEQ chief of staff and a 15 - year veteran of the American Petroleum Institute, spent the first term of the administration editing
science reports from various agencies on
climate change to downplay the role of greenhouse gas emissions — emphasizing elements of uncertainty from a 2001 National Research Council report on
climate change, according to an investigation
by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
And it is also clear — even to the negotiators who also agreed to be «informed»
by the
science expected from the International Government Panel on
Climate Change's next assessment report in 2013 — that neither the «Durban Platform for Enhanced Action» nor the extended Kyoto Protocol are equal to the task of restraining ever - rising greenhouse gas emissions.
Flooded farmland has already forced thousands of Bangladeshis to higher ground, but that's just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak, of the numbers of people who will need to move because of
climate change in the coming decade, according to a report released
by the Center for International Earth
Science Information Network (CIESIN) at Columbia University, the United Nations University and CARE International today.
Holt said that
climate change was selected as the inaugural training topic, under the Leshner Leadership Institute, because «the problem is both pressing and timely» - coinciding this year with the United Nations Climate Change Conference set to take place in Paris; the 50th anniversary of the first climate - change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emi
climate change was selected as the inaugural training topic, under the Leshner Leadership Institute, because «the problem is both pressing and timely» - coinciding this year with the United Nations Climate Change Conference set to take place in Paris; the 50th anniversary of the first climate - change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emis
change was selected as the inaugural training topic, under the Leshner Leadership Institute, because «the problem is both pressing and timely» - coinciding this year with the United Nations
Climate Change Conference set to take place in Paris; the 50th anniversary of the first climate - change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emi
Climate Change Conference set to take place in Paris; the 50th anniversary of the first climate - change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emis
Change Conference set to take place in Paris; the 50th anniversary of the first
climate - change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emi
climate -
change statement by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emis
change statement
by the President's Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology; and President Barack Obama's proposal to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The research, funded
by the National
Science Foundation, finds that
climate -
change advocates are largely failing to influence public opinion.
However, the strong evidence that supports the
climate science and human causation of
climate change doesn't warrant equal weight with minority claims, often disputed
by other research, that are not credible, they add.
Such a transition has been made possible
by the convergence of several factors: a stream of new
science showing an accelerating pace of
climate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national sec
climate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secu
change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the
change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secu
change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national sec
Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secu
Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the
climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national sec
climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national security).
Rep. Brian Babin (R - Texas), who sits on the House
Science, Space and Technology Committee and has rejected the mainstream scientific view that humans are the primary driver of
climate change, was trapped in his Houston house
by Harvey's floodwaters.
Conference chair Katherine Richardson, a biological oceanographer at the University of Copenhagen, told the opening plenary session that the conference would ensure that policymakers would pay attention
by providing compelling messages in three broad areas: how bad the
climate science is [that is, how bad the impact of
climate change will be], the «good news» that's out there in terms of new ways of mitigating carbon emissions, and the prospects for adapting to the proliferating impacts that scientists are seeing around the world.
With these words, Thomas Stocker of the University of Bern in Switzerland summed up the new assessment of
climate science by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
climate science by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change
Climate Change (IPCC).
The
Science Careers blog describes new research centers authorized
by the Waxman - Markey
climate change bill.
The two reports the researchers analyzed are «Working Group 1: The Physical
Science Basis»
by the IPCC and «
Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical
Science»
by the NIPCC.
Scientific research can inform policies aimed at addressing the needs of communities displaced
by climate change, something that is already happening in the United States and around the world, according to experts at a 25 - 26 July meeting of the AAAS
Science and Human Rights Coalition.
The
science - related cuts proposed
by the Trump administration come in programs that deal with issues it opposes ideologically, such as
climate change and the use of regulation to reduce pollution.
Several questions in the 2010 survey addressed the «Climategate» controversy, which brought allegations of flawed
science by researchers contributing to the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.