Sentences with phrase «change debate actually»

Not exact matches

In fact, I wonder if an appreciation of the nuances in the debate, and of abortion's connection to traditionally «progressive» issues like poverty and healthcare, may actually make those of us who are «stuck in the middle» especially effective agents of change.

It would be helpful if you actually debated ideas — I look forward to vigorous disagreements, it's part of life, and it's a great tool to learn and change — rather than resorted to tactics you accuse others of doing.

OMG, our mates are strengthening and we here debating how to keep obviously average players like walcot, elneny, wilshere et all, Antonio conte had the balls to tel a world class striker like diego costa to f *** off and we here debating mediocrity, we seem to have short memory as arsenal fanz, thumb me down d way u like, y ’ all gon protest nd moan and groan like last season coz as at now i see no phantom changes, still d same old system, same old players nd d deluded one probably closed for the transfer market after signing just one out of the numerous we actually need to compete.

What we actually need is a more democratic model of impact where it is conceived of as impact upon the public debate; inspiring gradual, long term change — and in which academic communication is part of a mutual, democratic learning process.

In terms of how probable each of those is, there's a lot of debate, but in terms of actually making policy, you have to look at all possibilities and figure out possible actions you could take to limit the damage from climate change.

While there seems to be at least a correlation between certain dietary changes and an increase in thyroid problems (correlation doesn't necessarily equal cause), there is some debate about what is actually causing the increase in thyroid problems.

I actually went to go Christmas shopping in this look after I snapped some pictures and debated changing at first and then thought you know what, who cares because all that matters is I feel damn good wearing this outfit right now.

Accordingly, some of us have tried to change the debate — actually just change the opening question to something like, «How do we continuously grow the number of students in high - performing schools?»

While I'm still pretty upset, I guess Cookie is officially now the guard dog to the estate — which is semi-appropriate as I actually wanted to do a doghouse with a dog (who I was debating on making pink) on the right side of the Pink Carpet I have — ended up changing my mind about it though.

If somebody has actually directly shown to high precision how much evaporation and precipitation changes as a result of CO2 forcing then I think we all would have heard about it and the sensitivity debate would be over.

Actually, the only debate still worth having is about the strength of the changes (climate sensitivity) and most estimates don't look good.

Not because you are likely to change a single mind in the first three categories, but because the people in those three categories are who we must debate with in the hopes that those in the 4th category read one or two paragraphs and actually begin to think things through for themselves based on the facts.

It is being able to predict how the Earth will change in the future that is actually important in the climate debate.

And while the climate debate rages on we can at least stop worrying about the safety of the one thing that could actually cause instant global climate change — thermonuclear mass destruction.

In December 2004 the RealClimate blogsite stated: «One could debate whether overwhelming consensus is adequate grounds for action on climate change, but there are no grounds for debating whether such consensus actually exists.»

The people you bash as «deniers» are actually not denying climate change, but are instead debating the following points that you seem to be ignoring.

Cox, as is the wont of most people in his position, who use their elevated status to pronounce on climate change, misapprehends climate scepticism — mostly because he's more interested in «taking the piss» out of it, than in actually understanding the terms of the debate.

Unfortunately, as Blair King writes «it actually represents a quite excellent example of how science is misrepresented to the public in the climate change debate.»

Whether or not the changing age demographic is actually going to cause huge difficulties is a subject of intense debate.