The climate
change debate generally tends to be in the megacurry range, or about 1 vindaloo.
Having spent the rest of August on holidays - too much of it in a Toronto traffic jam - I have been ignoring the DeSmogBlog (my apologies) and the climate
change debate generally.
Not exact matches
We can
debate the merits of this study (done by a real estate association of course) all day long (demographic sampling, housing price
changes, etc), but the point is, «above average» people
generally all own homes and are wealthier, be it 2X wealthier or 40X wealthier than the average renter.
Some of the people who watched the gubernatorial
debate on TV at the WXXI studios say their minds
generally weren't
changed a whole lot by what they saw.
Any
changes proposed by Parliament to the processes of law and justice will always be
debated fully by both houses before they can go on the statute books or can be moderated enough to be
generally acceptable.
But there's no doubt that the CCSSO - CGCS plan has
changed the testing
debate generally and on these inside - the - Beltway matters as well.
Widely known as climate
change «skeptics» or «deniers,» these individuals are
generally not climate scientists and do not
debate the science with the climate scientists...» — Dr. David Suzuki Foundation website, 2012
«As an influential blogger on climate
change, among other subjects, I'd really like Paul to meet you and chat to you about your views — how you see your role and that more
generally the influence of the internet in
changing the
debate; your views on climate-gate and how that was handled by the media; the failings or otherwise of scientists in communicating the science.»
The big
debate over how to tackle climate
change generally boils down to what kind of pain a climate plan will do to the economy; environmental benefits are
generally assumed.
Generally, I think the
debate on climate
change research funding on this blog is not very thoughtful.
Sure there will be
debate about science, observations and the empiric evidence will
change, our knowledge evolves, but the fits and starts are always
generally in a positive direction.
Evolution, of course, isn't alone anymore: climate
change now joins it as a settled scientific concept that a very vocal (and
generally uninformed) minority insists still requires
debate.
It is true that fossil fuel interests have had a
generally toxic effect on the
debate over climate
change in the US, corrupting the Republican party in particular into a reckless refusal to acknowledge climate science and its implications.
Unfortunately, our lawmakers are
generally slow to adapt the law to
changes in technology, so regulation over the use of these kinds of systems will likely be a topic of
debate for years to come.
Debates about the merits of the proposed
changes were few and far between, with developers
generally optimistic about the new protocol.