Contributors to climate
change debate websites and written submissions to us claimed that these e-mails showed a deliberate and systematic attempt by leading climate scientists to manipulate climate data, arbitrarily adjusting and «cherry - picking» data that supported their global warming claims and deleting adverse data that questioned their theories.
Contributors to climate
change debate websites and written submissions to us claimed that these e-mails showed a deliberate and systematic attempt by leading climate scientists to manipulate climate data, arbitrarily adjusting and «cherry - picking» data that supported their global warming claims and deleting adverse data that questioned their theories.
Not exact matches
For those looking for more nuance, detail and depth in analysing the
changing position of China and Africa in the international system, I recommend visiting the
website of the Oxford University China - Africa Network, which I convene and is currently hosting a series of
debates between African public intellectuals on what Chinese investment means for local economic conditions from Mauritania to South Africa.
Walt, «climate
change debate» wants to «keep
debate alive» — look at their suggested reading at the
website climatechangedebate.org (anything anybody wants to add is included)-- it's a chatgroup meant for maintaining controversy; Yahoo is selling readers to advertisers.
The
website program described the agreed to
debate as «AREDAY Climate Change Debate: Reality or Fiction?&
debate as «AREDAY Climate
Change Debate: Reality or Fiction?&
Debate: Reality or Fiction?»
Widely known as climate
change «skeptics» or «deniers,» these individuals are generally not climate scientists and do not
debate the science with the climate scientists...» — Dr. David Suzuki Foundation
website, 2012
Perhaps I should have said «he later abandoned the idea» to forestall silly
debate over when [I shall not object if you substitute «soon» by «later» on your
website, but you should show the maturity to
change the text to what I otherwise suggested].
Needless to say this has been deeply disturbing to an «ordinary Joe» (with 5 grandchildren) who has made an effort to understand the science and the politics that underlie the climate
change «
debate», especially since my country has become such an important player in the fossil fuel business with its tarsands and pipeline industries that affect us all, so I've tried to find out more about Judith Curry's recent contributions to the
debate, not so much the hair - splitting, angels on the head of a pin, esoteric dissections of graphs and stats that I see here on your
website but the ethical stance that you take on the larger issue of «killing» the IPCC and all it represents.
I can't overemphasize how important postings like this and
websites like this are in the climate
change debate.
ALEC characterizes climate
change on its
website as «a historical phenomenon» for which «the
debate will continue on the significance of natural and anthropogenic contributions» (American Legislative Exchange Council 2010, 2014; SourceWatch 2014).