It publishes blog posts and profiles of scores of scientists and climate skeptics that it claims (incorrectly) are part of a «well - funded and highly organized public relations campaign» that is «poisoning» the climate
change debate with «fraudulent misinformation.»
The exhibition interconnects issues surrounding the climate
change debate with art that reflects the topic and intrinsically embodies the way in which artists have responded to the topic.
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA — In the run - up to national elections on 21 August, the country's top science body, the Australian Academy of Science (AAS), has weighed in on the climate
change debate with a report backing the mainstream scientific view that human - induced climate change is real and that a business - as - usual approach to carbon emissions will lead to a «catastrophic» four - to five - degree increase in average global temperatures.
Not exact matches
For example, there's been a long - standing
debate both externally and internally on the name of the company and whether it should
change with our transformation.
The healthcare
debate unfolded rapidly last week,
with the story
changing at a dizzying pace, until it ended
with the defeat of the American Health Care Act (AHCA).
The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic
debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in
with a report arguing that global grain markets have
changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.
The
changes forced the
debate to stretch for hours, as Republicans released a final version of their bill
with adjustments scribbled in the margins of the text.
And despite fathering four children, three
with wife Laurene Powell Jobs and another from an earlier relationship (whom he acknowledged only after a court - ordered paternity test), Jobs seemingly never used his influence to
change the
debate over work - life balance.
Tuur: [00:24:41] So the way I see it is that we had a big scaling
debate the past few years and the question was are we going to do on
change scaling
with a heart.
With the current
debate going on, what
changes are likely for the EB - 5?
They keep
changing their story and stance depending on whom they are
debating with.
Compare that to the dogmatic stance of religion — a phony belief system that starts and end
with unproven manmade tribal myths, not open to true
debate, and that only
changes in order to maintain power over the gullible.
After a long and heavy
debate, which concluded
with lengthy speeches by Wilson and the head of the Ministerial Association, the
change was accepted 776 to 494.
If those in the church who are in favor of
changing long - held attitudes and ordinances relating to homosexuals were merely cultural relativists
with no regard for the Bible or tradition, the
debate would be easier.
No amount of twisting,
debating, or whatever excuse someone can come up
with changes this fact - right?
I am a Christian but avoid christian religions other than as a place of meditation, worship and intellectual
debate, certainly not as a place for moral guidance as they
change the rules
with the politics of the age.
I'll also accept the answer of «nothing» that will
change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can
change your mind it's impossible to
debate or even hold a discussion
with you and we'll go our separate ways.
This is a question that has been
debated in ecclesial circles ever since the Consilium ad Exsequendam Constitutionem de Sacra Liturgia, the group charged
with implementing Vatican II's
changes, finished its work in 1970.
No such statement is perfect and I would want some
changes — especially in connection
with the definition of torture — before signing this one, but «An Evangelical Declaration Against Torture» is an exceedingly valuable contribution to a public
debate of which we dare not tire.
A comparison
with the earlier philosophical
debate on immortality offers an insight into the importance of the
change in perspective.
If the long story of the Trinitarian
debate in Christendom is to be re-enacted in our present time its outcome may result in somewhat different formulations from those of the past, but scarcely in a substantive
change of the affirmation that God is One and that however the doctrine of the Personae is stated it must still be affirmed that the Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Father and the Spirit can not be equated
with either.
Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good
debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they
change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it
with unbelievers.brentnz
I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to
change prophecy the way that he did
with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning
changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD
changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make
changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of
debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship
with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion
Dr. Hayhoe is the co-author of the book A Climate for
Change: Global Warming Facts for Faith - Based Decisions and describes herself as «a spokesperson
with one principal goal — to bring public awareness to the simple truth that the scientific
debate is over, and now it's time for all of us to take action.»
This necessarily involves a look at the tensions,
debates and passions marking the era from Vatican I to Vatican II: a Church struggling
with dramatic
changes in European politics as the last vestiges of the ancien regime toppled.
We've yet to reckon
with this
change in our public
debates.
I had an odd experience myself of «
changing sides» in a rather fundamental linguistics
debate with my own closest colleague in the field.
It is something like «dialog, laughter,
debate, and a beer
with friends» ---- that
changes me the most.
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang
with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red
with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong
with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and
debate the issue
with bold
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang while wenger face went all red
with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR is far to slow to fix things what is wrong
with him he most not be in good health cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and
debate the issue
with bold
If it where just possible to take these statistics, and sit down face to face
with PGMOB, the FA and some media hacks, on a public forum, and ask them to explain them, along
with the coincidence of how things
changed following game 50 and Riley's subsequent appointment, I think that would make for a very interesting
debate, especially if video evidence was allowed.
And while there is much blurring,
with some sick of Wenger but wanting him to bow out
with a trophy and a legacy, and others who have supported his retention now angling for a
change, that is our analytical right as fans — we can love the man yet get frustrated
with him, we can support him and despair at some of his decisions, and we can
debate his merits and flaws ad nauseam.
This was one of the reasons why a
change at the very top was needed but the stick the fans gave former manager, Gary Megson, wasn't called for nor deserved but we're sure Owen Coyle will get a tremendous reception at The Reebok this Sunday, although whether he leave there
with the love still in tact is another question, and one that's open to
debate.
Just like they did in Ottawa 40 years ago and again last weekend
with Motrin, the groundswell of public
debate can cause
changes to made.
The development taking place in both towns has sparked much
debate, whether it involves efforts to make sure high - density housing and newly built retail spaces don't
change the character of the historic downtowns or ensuring teardowns — new homes built on the site of razed ones — don't clash
with neighboring homes or the town's character.
«
Change» candidates have a particular need to convince voters that they're a safe choice, as Reagan's experience in 1980 shows — he ran very close
with Carter until the
debates, which allowed him to convince enough Americans that he wasn't a crazed bomb - thrower.
When this new alliance - the European Conservatives and Reformists - was created after the 2009 Euro - election
with «a bunch of homophobes, anti-Semites and climate -
change deniers» (as Nick Clegg later described them in a TV leaders
debate) I objected and was expelled from the Conservative Party.
We've recently seen a
change in the tenor of the
debate, at least in Westminster,
with pro-union commentators and campaigners suddenly seeming quite panicked by the possibility of a win for the «yes» camp.
Naturally we should also work
with opinion leaders, since persuading bloggers, TV pundits and the like that the dominant Obamacare narrative is obsolete is the only thing that will
change the broadcast - level public
debate.
Tonight's the REVOLUTIONARY, GON NA
CHANGE EVERYTHING presidential
debate, sponsored by CNN and YouTube —
with questions submitted by YOU, the great unwashed masses....
Apart from the discussion over the necessity to find alternative fora to deal
with climate
change, another issue to be increasingly
debated is the necessity to find a new approach to manage the overall negotiating process.
«The widespread belief now in the Labour party that whilst Jeremy is a good man
with great Labour values who has done a lot for this party and I think
changed the
debate in this country about our economy, he's been right about lots of things,» he said.
With just an hour before the governor's third State of the State address, the state Senate is
debating unprecedented rules
changes that would establish a coalition government of the GOP and the Independent Democratic Conference.
In his letter, which was drawn up jointly
with Dutch premier Jan Peter Balkenende, Mr Blair notes the importance of energy security but says any
debate on the subject must also be about climate
change and its links to the European economy.
The forum also had a candidate dispute over the format,
with Gentile asserting that it was originally intended as a
debate and was
changed at Donovan's insistence to separate, sequential appearances.
As early as 1918, the TUC
debated whether to continue to co-operate
with the Labour Party following
changes to the constitution to allow Party membership to non-unionists.
The secretary of state David Miliband launched the draft climate
change bill
with the insistence there is no longer any
debate that climate
change is a reality and emissions are to blame.
«The law should be
changed so that if you want to run for office in New York State, you have to agree to participate in a series of public
debates with all candidates who meet the legal requirements to be on the ballot,» said Hawkins.
Or should it continue to be more of an advisory body,
with the right to
debate important issues, call ministers to account, and ask (but not require) MPs to
change their minds?
Their three - stage
debate format could easily have been
changed so the first
debate included all parties
with an MP, the second any party contesting all seats, or at least a majority of seats, and a final one
with the two men who had a chance of becoming prime minister.