An internationally recognized water and climate
change expert admitted yesterday that he lied about his identity to obtain internal funding and strategy documents from the Heartland Institute.
Not exact matches
«Things are not going to
change from one day to the next,»
admits Nicolas Israël, a social sciences researcher in Paris and a member of the
expert group advising the commission on HRS4R.
I conjecture that three
changes in the way in which the climate problem is presented by the
experts to the general public would make the conversation go better: acknowledge that climate constraints are unwelcome (thereby establishing empathy with general audiences, as a doctor does when conveying bad news), present the science as unfinished (thereby taking away the surprise factor that accompanies every new wrinkle — cf. the cosmic ray stories of a couple of weeks ago), and
admit that no solution is wonderful (something hard for much of our community, which loves some strategy and hates at least one of the others).
While the Koch brothers
admit they're not
experts on climate
change, they are
experts in CAUSING IT.
Very curious that a group would claim to analyze «
changes in the electricity market caused by RPS,» but
admit they are not
expert enough to determine the actual cost of electricity.
There are multiple scientists, researchers, professors, as well as weather and climate
change experts that have come out within the past couple of years and have openly
admitted our current understanding of climate
change and global warming to be false.
I'm told that the Smithsonian (SAO; Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) data from 1905 - 23 are generally considered somewhat problematic due to instrument
changes and calibration issues (I'm
admit, I'm not
expert on this issue).
In the past seven years the Supreme Court has
changed the fundamental role of trial judges by expanding, in Daubert, the analyses by which trial judges
admit or exclude
expert testimony and by broadening, in Kumho, the scope of testimony subjected to this kind of review.