It is difficult to
change government behavior, because the politics of reducing spending, or raising taxes is tough.
Not exact matches
The last thing Wall Street wants is for the
government to
change its
behavior.
The economic cost of
changes in
behavior due to taxes,
government benefits, monopolies, and other forces that interfere with the otherwise - efficient operation of a market economy.
EDMONTON — In response to PC legislation claiming to increase
government accountability, NDP Leader Rachel Notley called for a series of
changes that would effectively protect Albertans from several forms of inappropriate
behavior demonstrated by the PCs over the last several years.
These factors — many of which are beyond our control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict — include: credit, market, liquidity and funding, insurance, operational, regulatory compliance, strategic, reputation, legal and regulatory environment, competitive and systemic risks and other risks discussed in the risk sections of our 2017 Annual Report; including global uncertainty and volatility, elevated Canadian housing prices and household indebtedness, information technology and cyber risk, regulatory
change, technological innovation and new entrants, global environmental policy and climate
change,
changes in consumer
behavior, the end of quantitative easing, the business and economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we operate, the effects of
changes in
government fiscal, monetary and other policies, tax risk and transparency and environmental and social risk.
Phoebe Thompson, editor of Premier Youthwork Magazaine thinks a number of factors are behind the
changes in teenage
behavior, on Premier's «News Hour» programme, she said: «the
government has taken to make smoking less appealing by covering packets and also putting the long term effects on there, and also the rise of contraception and better sex education probably has contributed to the lowering of teenage pregnancies».
Obviously, legislators who study
government programs observe society
behaviors and see that
changes have to be made in many
government programs.
To advocate self - help, to argue that affirmative action can not be a long - run solution to the problem of racial inequality, to suggest that some of what is transpiring in black communities reflects a spiritual malaise, to note that fundamental
change will require that individual lives be transformed in ways that
governments are ill - suited to do, to urge that we must look to how black men and women are relating to each other, how parents are bringing up their children, that we have to ask ourselves what values inform the
behavior of our youth» to do these things is not to take a partisan position, or vent some neoconservative ideological screed.
Greater
government involvement, industry collaborations, and marketing campaigns were cited as some of the levers to
change consumer
behavior.
BY DUNCAN OSBORNE As
government funders increasingly pay for biomedical interventions that prevent HIV infections, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and provide less support for behavioral interventions that increase condom use and alter sexual
behavior, the funding landscape for AIDS groups may shift and they will have to
change how they interact with their HIV - negative -LSB-...]
«While
government can not force people to
change their
behaviors — we can't legislate against eating Twinkies — we can take steps to encourage people to take better care of themselves,» Borough President James Oddo, who funded the equipment when he took office in 2014, said.
Forand also cited DiNapoli's audits of state and local
governments and school districts that save taxpayers millions of dollars statewide while using the investment clout of the pension fund to influence corporate
behavior such as in addressing climate
change.
The goals include ending single use plastics, promoting alternatives to fossil fuel - based materials, promoting 100 percent recycling of plastics, corporate and
government accountability, and
changing human
behavior concerning plastics.
I think having employers take a lead in encouraging healthy work sites — with
government support — may have a
change in getting some sustained
behavior changes.
Government officials defending segregationist policies argued that it wasn't possible to
change people's
behavior without
changing their hearts and minds first.
Formerly known as the UK
government's «nudge» unit, the now private organisation attempts to understand human
behavior and use it to subtly push for positive
changes.
«The concern we raised, and was raised much more forcibly by the House of Lords report, is that
government and policymakers were in danger of ignoring some of the very potent means or levers for
changing behavior if they focused only on nudging,» she says.
«We hope we will persuade the U.K.
government that these interventions are valuable as part of an armory to persuade people to
change behavior,» says committee chair Julia Neuberger.
The U.K.
government is keen to address societal issues such as obesity and carbon emissions by finding ways to
change behavior without using regulation.
But instead of reducing their number of sexual partners or
changing their sexual
behavior as advocated in
government and NGO health campaigns, they have developed a tactic, which is embedded in locally meaningful modes of reasoning.
«The insurance industry has the ability to
change behavior, policies and communicate with clients,» says Nancy Skinner, US director of the Climate Group, which lobbies for business and
government action to address global warming.
Prepare graduates to take leadership roles in the field of nutrition education and
behavior change in a variety of settings including individual, community, and
government.
By utilizing innovative instructional design and the latest technology advancements, our firm partners with large brands and federal
government agencies to create cutting - edge training that engages employees and
changes behaviors.
It's too early to say if anything will come of it, but frankly it worries me when the
government tries to get involved with
changing or artificially constructing investor
behavior — especially, when it's simply a reaction to a short - term event (recession).
Government Incentives Drive Collection Agency Behavior Changes made to the compensation system in July 2012 demonstrate that the options collection agencies offer to borrowers are driven by the fees the government pays, not b
Government Incentives Drive Collection Agency
Behavior Changes made to the compensation system in July 2012 demonstrate that the options collection agencies offer to borrowers are driven by the fees the
government pays, not b
government pays, not by the law.
It is something that I think is necessary before our
governments spend billions or trillions of dollars to
change behavior.
There is a great need for everybody to
change in our own
behavior, in our actions and to engage in causing
change in industries and
governments.
Canadian researchers have delved into this question, compiling a list of the most commonly suggested «green»
behavior changes, as found in high school science textbooks and
government documents.
There is something of a debate underway currently in environmental circles as to the extent to which a sustainable economy will be delivered through consumer - led
behavior change and business and
government - led structural transformation.
This question is designed to expose that those politicians who refuse to reduce their
government's ghg on the basis that they are not scientists can not ethically justify non-action on climate
change on this basis because once they are put on notice by respected scientific organizations that ghg from their
government jurisdiction are harming others, they have a duty to prevent dangerous
behavior or establish credible scientific evidence that the alleged dangerous
behavior is safe.
Our values are aligned and we also find it fundamental to empower and mobilize people from the local levels to bring real
changes in
behavior and thus pressure
governments and companies to do their part as well,» says the creative.
Americans who are skeptical about climate
change engage in personal
behavior that is more friendly to the environment than climate alarmists, who support increased
government regulation, a new study has found.
We must see climate
change as an ethical problem because: (a) it is a problem caused by some people in one part of the world that puts others and the natural resources on which they depend at great risk, (b) the harms to these other people are not mere inconveniences but in some cases catastrophic losses of life or the ability to sustain life, and (c) those who are vulnerable to climate
change cant petition their
governments to act to protect themselves but must rely upon a hope that a sense of justice and responsibility of those causing the problem will motivate them to
change their
behavior.
Because motivating individual
behavior to engage in activities that don't produce GHGs was assumed to be the major challenge to improve
government responses to climate
change, proponents of climate
change policies have largely relied on the disciplines of economics and psychology, two disciplines which claim expertise on how to motivate individual
behavior, to make policy recommendations on how to
change individual responses to climate
change.
And if you believe, as do many conservatives, that
government intervention in markets and in social arrangements should be kept to a minimum, you can find factual support for your views in the long - term unpredictability of regional climate
behavior, the significant economic and social costs associated with shifting to more expensive energy sources, and the historical failure of
government efforts to steer large - scale social and economic
change.
Even if one buys into the premise that the
government should be forcing businesses and consumers to alter their
behavior in the name of fighting climate
change (or «oil dependency»), it is still an unavoidable conclusion that CAFE standards are absurd.
@Judith The social cost of carbon, as used by the
government in its cost - benefit analyses of new and revised regulations, is a carbon tax only if models used by the regulator accurately predict the induced
change in
behavior.
The most unforgiveable unethical
behavior surrounding the entire issue of «hiding the decline» and similar biases in published research, is when climate
change scientists who know about their — «cherry picking the data», — biased and selective presentation of all data pertinent to published paper conclusions, and — outright errors in their data and peer - reviewed papers, don't speak out loudly in the media outlets that have misled the general public in reporting about their flawed, misleading research, as well as, associated journals and professional societies, to stop politicians and
government regulators from using their flawed and misleading research results to pass laws and regulations that have severe effects on the prosperity and quality of life of their fellow citizens of the US and the world.
In his opinion issued Feb. 29, Leon wrote that it was clear to him that, and the
government had effectively conceded, «the Government's actual purpose is not to inform or educate, but rather to advocate a change in behavior - specifically to encourage smoking cessation and to discourage potential new smokers from starti
government had effectively conceded, «the
Government's actual purpose is not to inform or educate, but rather to advocate a change in behavior - specifically to encourage smoking cessation and to discourage potential new smokers from starti
Government's actual purpose is not to inform or educate, but rather to advocate a
change in
behavior - specifically to encourage smoking cessation and to discourage potential new smokers from starting.»
Every time we obtain justice for a client, it has the capacity to inspire individuals to
change their
behavior and can even force the biggest hospitals, corporations, and
governments to
change policies and practices that will make Iowa safer for all.
What we found back then was fascinating: corporations engaged in illegal
behavior that were able to block
government oversight sometimes
changed because of lawsuits brought by everyday Americans.
SCL is in the business of mind - bending, working with global clients, managing political campaigns, developing psychological approaches to conflict resolution, and creating what it calls «
behavior change campaigns» for
government clients and NGOs.
Travel
behavior is
changing remarkably, as evidenced by the federal
government's tracking of total vehicle miles traveled, which has been declining since 2006.