Not exact matches
«Lear's counterpart
in the contemporary
Church,» writes Mankowski, «is a certain segment of clergymen which has made it a
practice to vindicate its prejudices by affecting to consult with the faithful, to listen to their concerns, only to announce with astonishment that God's Little Ones are pleading for precisely those
changes for which the Listeners themselves have a deep and discerning sympathy.»
Others are even more adamant, however,
in saying that the
Church can not
change a
practice that is based on the doctrine of Jesus, the apostles, and centuries of authoritative teaching.
Church leader and theologian Steve Holmes wrote: «I agree profoundly with Steve
in his concern that our pastoral
practice in this area has often been appalling, and needs to
change... his diagnosis of a real and urgent problem is spot on... [He] names a pastoral scandal that we have swept under the carpet for too long.»
These focused on
changes that had occurred over the past three decades
in culture,
church and educational
practices.
I also hear from a lot of evangelicals who have begun attending Mainline Protestant
churches precisely because they welcome LGBT people, accept scientific findings regarding climate
change and evolution,
practice traditional worship, preach from the lectionary, affirm women
in ministry, etc., but these new attendees never hear the leadership of the
church explain why this is the case.
Here we touch on a second major
change that slowly took place
in the
practice of paideia before Christian
churches appeared on the scene.
There is also, clearly, a variety of
churches in which project members are trying to
change minds and inculcate more faithful
practices.
According to the document «Towards Common Witness» some of the characteristics which distinguish proselytism from Christian witness are: unfair criticism of caricaturing of the doctrines, beliefs and
practices of another
church; presenting one's
church or confession as «the true
church»; the use of humanitarian aid, educational opportunities or moral and psychological pressure, to induce people to
change their affiliation; exploiting people's loneliness, even disillusionment with their own
church in order to «convert» them.
It is revealing, however, that many who did join
churches and synagogues
in the 1950s were quick to leave them once their children had grown up, once Vatican II
changed the way of Catholic worship, once the Civil Rights Movement put on display the un-religious
practices of many of America's mainline
churches.
Second,
in the community of
churches in mission called the Council for World Mission (CWM), there have been radical
changes in the thinking and
practice of mission.
I could look back
in history and see that major figures
in church history that caused the greatest
change for the good
in the
church practiced expository preaching.
While I do believe
changes in the
church could've
changed those transitions, I also wonder if our
practices, friendships and mindsets could have made a difference too.
If it is not a revolution, this is certainly a radical
change in the understanding and
practice of ministry
in the Catholic
Church.
«People who leave the
Church despise the
Church and are giving up» Clark is completely false here, their leaving because, it's no longer a
Church in practice, and doesn't want to
change.
And the reason we are sometimes not so nice to you religious lunatics is because you are not satisfied with
practicing your faith quietly
in your own home or
church — you must spread your dirty faith by force, attempting to
change the laws of this country and force others to act and think like you.
Feminine theology need not ask Christian theologians of the past to justify today's
changes in theology or
church structure and
practice.
It has been indicated that there is also the need for significant
changes within the present structure of religious television, both
in terms of integrity of message and
practice,
in representativeness of a diversity of religious traditions and viewpoints, and
in the relation of communication efforts to the wider work of the
church.
Before
change in sexual behavior and family structure challenged the moral commitments of «the family pew,» anthropologist W. Lloyd Warner had observed that beliefs and
practices in the
church and
in the family were so intertwined that, «Should the present form of the family disappear, the Christian
church would necessarily undergo revolutionary
changes.
It is important to realize that a very able and earnest attempt is being made by Catholic scholars
in this country, with much support from Catholics
in western Europe, to
change the principles as well as the
practice of the
Church in this matter.
Cardinal Robert Sarah, prefect of the Vatican's Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, caused a rumpus earlier this summer by proposing to a meeting of liturgists
in London that the Catholic
Church return to the
practice of priest and people praying
in the same direction during the Liturgy of the Eucharist: a
change in liturgical «orientation» the cardinal described as the entire congregation looking together toward the Lord who is to come.
According to the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia, Simons was ordained as a Roman Catholic priest at Utrecht
in 1524, but quickly began to question some of the
church's beliefs and
practices when, «while he was administering the Mass he began to doubt whether the bread and the wine were actually being
changed into the flesh and blood of Christ.»
While it's always been a fluid, free - market kind of place, Sidley has
in recent years moved to make its famous litigation
practice an even broader
church — «when I started there were four or five litigation groups and then about two years ago they
changed the organization to just one general department, meaning attorneys have more freedom and the teams can do more cross-selling.»