Not exact matches
A spike in bond yields and a
clear change of direction from central banks
means there isn't a lot of value in global bond markets, a fund manager told CNBC on Tuesday.
The actions that followed that all - hands, including the dismissal of 26 employees after the results of Holder's investigation were announced, sent a very
clear message «that we
meant business» and were serious about making fundamental
changes.
To be a truly collaborative leader and colleague, you need to be willing to get
clear on what collaboration
means for you and others, address non-collaborative behaviors when you see them, and offer feedback when you see someone making the positive
changes you've requested to create a more collaborative environment.
All these
changes mean companies must
clear a higher bar in creating cultures that are welcoming to everyone.
Didi officials said the disruptive
change sweeping the industry
meant there was a
clear mutual interest in new players like itself and traditional manufacturers working together to develop and improve ride - hailing and sharing platforms.
I
mean, the Fed has
changed direction that «s
clear.
We are entering the first wave of
change and we will undoubtedly have several more before we have a
clear picture of how much buyer behavior has
changed and what these
changes mean for B2B businesses.
The fact that the demand for credit is distinct from the demand for money, and that the two things can
change independently,
means, among other things, that interest rates, which adjust to «
clear» markets for various kinds of credit, can not also be counted on to «
clear» the market for money balances.
Moreover, it is very
clear that he had no intention of sanctioning modi or ways of setting forth these truths that
change their sense or
meaning.
This general view finds its fullest and
clearest New Testament expression in the Fourth Gospel, was elaborated in the great creedal discussions of several centuries later, and was finally and definitively formulated by the Council of Chalcedon in 451: «One and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, acknowledged in two natures, without confusion, without
change, without division, without separation; the distinction of the natures being by no
means taken away because of the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved and concurring in one person.
I have had a
change of heart on this and i believe that jesus
means what he says for us to go and sin no more.Why because the women caught in adultery is us it is a universal message for us sinners judged and condemned by the law if we do nt want to be under the law then the only way is to follow jesus but not according to the flesh but according to the spirit.Because if we walk in the spirit we will not gratify the desires of the flesh.Which
means we will not sin that sums up the message once having been saved by jesus we follow him and walk by the spirit the message is
clear and he provides the
means for us to do it through his holy spirit.For sin shall not have dominion over us we are more than conquerers overcomers through Jesus Christ.
we realize at this late date and due to death the apology will not bear any more strange fruit, but we would like to make such apologies so that people will think we are sincere and
mean what we say even though our apologies
change nothing... and we'd like to apologize in advance for any future bigoted acts we may make, recognizing that once we apologize we are seen as honorable and in the
clear»
Sometimes I wonder if it would be easier (or maybe I
mean, simpler, or
CLEARER) to just navigate a total walking away from faith, instead of a very specific
changing of faith and remaining in faith, but having a very, very significant shift in what you believe and how you live it out, because family and friends will carry on like nothing's
changed, but EVERYTHING has
changed, even within faith.
The stretching of
meaning in conceptual
change is essentially the grasping of a
clearer generic
meaning of which the
meanings in the earlier theory are species.
It is
clear that the thesis of
meaning variance has implications for an understanding of conceptual
change.
Changes include keeping text
clear, formatting layouts and tables, and making sure links adequately describe where they go («click here» does not
mean much in isolation).
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per
clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all
change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
However, we've also seen that message co-opted by teams to offer generic support with no
clear meaning, or one that has
changed from the original one.
It was
clear in a very confusing time, when even the Chief Executive Gazidis said it was a catalyst for a
change meaning that there had to be a restructuring of the team personnel and the management, presumably in the close season.
Your style is something that's always
changing and evolving, and that
means clearing out your wardrobe and replacing some of your fabrics is going to be easier than anything else on this list.
If you're saying no TV right before bed one night only to cave in the next evening, you are sending a
clear message to your child that the rules don't
mean much, don't need to be respected, and can easily be
changed.
Third, make it
clear that while some things are
changing, other important things are not — like your values, your faith, your involvement in their lives, and how much they
mean to you.
But «let's try not to make it so» is also a good idea, if those who do want a consensus to address climate
change could challenge that trend: David Cameron has done so in making it a high profile issue and taking a
clear line - but he has tended to tell us that this proves his party has
changed, which
means he underestimates how far he seems to be from convincing a rather large chunk of it.
It
means changing the way parliament works so we have a system that reflects the 21st century not the 19th — and that must
mean a
clear manifesto mandate on democratic House of Lords reform.
Both appeals court rulings made
clear that overturning the convictions did not
mean innocents had been brought to the slaughter, only that while their cases were moving through the justice system, the proof needed in public corruption cases
changed.
Let us be
clear that within a very short period of time the failure to investigate and call to account those individuals responsible for the financial disaster may well
mean that with little
change in Icelandic regulation it could all happen again.
CROWLEY: Just to make
clear before I move on, yes or no, does that
mean you think the president ought to
change the members of his economic team?
Then you can make very
clear predictions about what certain
changes mean and verify those things experimentally.
What those
changes mean and how useful they are for determining health risks aren't yet
clear.
It's not
clear what that
change will ultimately
mean for the roughly 4000 employees at about 50 facilities across the country with an overall budget of $ 900 million per year.
While most thyroid cancers are sporadic,
meaning they happen without
clear reasons, exposure to radiation has been shown to
change the molecular makeup of the cancer, according to the researchers.
Such a small
change could
mean the difference between acne prone and
clear glowing skin.
No, it
means you should be
clear on the character of the man you want and how he will treat you, and less hung up on characteristics, like hair, that are bound to
change in a few years.
Victory is not a bad game by any
means, but it is a
clear example of
changes made in all the wrong places.
Yes, there are a number of different routes into teacher training and perhaps the advice on the website could be
clearer in terms of its audience (questions from GCSE level students will be very different from those in their mid-30s thinking of a career
change for example) but I do not think that the multiple
means of qualification is the problem.
But, back to their causal estimates: one would have to believe that the net
changes in families fully absorb the six-fold spending increase above their
mean - equalizing level in order to reconcile actual spending increases with the
clear lack of any dramatic outcome improvements.
«So, it was a bit of a case of initiative overload... we needed to make it very
clear to staff that we were taking a long - term approach, it was research - based, you'd be supported with all of this, it's not going to
mean dramatic
change very quickly but there is an expectation that there will be
change.»
While the need for perennial workplace learning is
clear and constant, the
means of delivering learning are
changing.
What this
change actually
means, though, is still not
clear.
Perhaps, for some types of works, that's true: A tabular presentation of census data from 1910 may be
clearer than a narrative presentation (with endlessly long sentences and lots of commas and semicolons), but it does not
change the
meaning of the underlying data.
E-paper uses no power once the image is displayed and
changes are powered via solar, which
means this is the greenest and
clearest information interface that can be produced giving the consumer up to date information in high resolution, the electronic displays also vastly reduces the cost of ownership as there is no need to physically visit the site with remote updates being used to
change content.
Getting a small personal loan and
clearing some debts will
mean the ratio is
change in your favor and increase the chances of getting an auto loan approved with bad credit.
It» never
clear exactly what policies an agency will pursue under a new director -
changing circumstances or political realties can
mean that even top priorities can fall by the wayside.
Completing the test does not
mean that the dog is
clear for any of the tests, only that it has completed the necessary testing.If the list of requirement
changes, any dog currently registered is not required to have the additional testing.
Even if the guy is legally allowed to create updates and publish them (though I wonder if that
means anyone can just
change a tiny insignificant thing to dodge a DMCA takedown), it's
clear what the idea behind the DMCA claim is.
Lots of
meaning get lost /
changed by this, like when an interviewer said Aonuma said the bokoblins were cute, when he actually said they were kawaisou («pitiable in a non-negative way»), which is a word both without a
clear one - word equivalent and very close to kawaii, the word for cute.
By that I
mean having a very
clear and developed set of principles about what is and isn't abstract, which are still open to
change, as all things should be.
In this sense, Koons» primary motivation is direct and
clear communication with as many people as possible, which is why he focuses on universally understandable themes that he showcases artistically by
means of contextual
changes, dimensional shifts, and a high degree of perfection in the execution.
I often see people being taken to task for saying GCMs failed to predict xyz, and are told the GCMs (especially in the IPCC) were not predictions in the first place, although the glossaries in the IPCC reports do define their word
meanings... but these are still confusing for the lay person imo — because they chop and
change words in their definitions and are not
clear in how or when they apply.
I particularly enjoyed the slides that, when combined (1) provided an overview of hotter and cooler CO2 molecules as it relates to how they are seen from outer space and from profile — because this will make it easier for me to explain this process to others; (2) walked through the volcanic and solar activity vs assigning importance to CO2
changes — because this another way to help make it
clearer, too, but in another way; (3) discussed CO2 induced warming and ocean rise vs different choices we might make — because this helps point out why every day's delay matters; and (4) showed Figure 1 from William Nordhaus» «Strategies for Control of Carbon Dioxide» and then super-imposed upon that the global
mean temperature in colors showing pre-paper and post-paper periods — because this helps to show just how far back it was possible to make reasoned projections without the aid of a more nuanced and modern understanding.