Sentences with phrase «change models correctly»

Also, do the climate change models correctly predict the temperature gaps between day and night — or does that not matter?

Not exact matches

«The new data set will allow us to check if our ocean models can correctly represent changes in the flow of warm water under ice shelves,» he added.
Even models that correctly capture cloud behavior may fail to fully account for other climate feedbacks from factors like changing snow and sea ice cover, atmospheric water vapor content, and temperature.
This is not only in excellent agreement with the observed temperature changes at the surface (blue stars), it also correctly reproduces the observed heat storage in the oceans — a strong indicator that the model's heat budget is correct.
This is not only in excellent agreement with the observed temperature changes at the surface (blue stars), it also correctly reproduces the observed heat storage in the oceans — a strong indicator that the model's heat budget is correct.
The approximately 20 - year lag (between atmospheric CO2 concentration change and reaching equilibrium temperature) is an emerging property (just like sensitivity) of the global climate system in the GCM models used in the paper I linked to above, if I understood it correctly.
If you can't keep up with annual - decadal changes in the TOA radiative imbalance or ocean heat content (because of failure to correctly model changes in the atmosphere and ocean due to natural variability), then your climate model lacks fidelity to the real world system it is tasked to represent.
The software doesn't model it correctly & the effect changes depending on what climate you're in.
Make sure that the strange climate changes in 1940 are correctly replicated by the models.
«The CCR - II report correctly explains that most of the reports on global warming and its impacts on sea - level rise, ice melts, glacial retreats, impact on crop production, extreme weather events, rainfall changes, etc. have not properly considered factors such as physical impacts of human activities, natural variability in climate, lopsided models used in the prediction of production estimates, etc..
In fact, there has been no clear large - scale surface warming for more than 16 years now, and a new paper published earlier this month in the prestigious journal Nature Climate Change affirms the climate models inability to correctly simulate these observations.
The problem is whether the traditional climate model is correctly interpreting climate change.
The models didn't correctly predict changes in outgoing radiation, or the humidity and temperature trends of the upper troposphere.
Given the above, there is little hope that the traditional climate models correctly interpret climate change and nothing concerning the real climate can be inferred from them because from a false premise everything can be concluded.
There is an implicit assumption that the model, not only matches the 30y period temperatures but also correctly captures the climate that is producing those changes.
''... had the IPCC FAR correctly projected the changes in atmospheric GHG from 1990 to 2011, their «best estimate» model with a 2.5 °C equilibrium climate sensitivity would have projected the ensuing global warming very accurately»
No climate model correctly predicts the degree of long - term natural background variability of the temperature, which is * the * critical property needed to distinguish natural from anthropogenic changes.
If climate change can't be modeled correctly at some number of grid points then I wouldn't expect accuracy at other grid points.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z