Disruptive has become a popular and positive term for companies or technologies that
change old ways of thinking.
Her approach to education was revolutionary and has
changed the old way of thinking.
Her approach to education was revolutionary and has
changed the old way of thinking.
Her approach to education was revolutionary and has
changed the old way of thinking.
Her approach to education was revolutionary and has
changed the old way of thinking.
Her approach to education was revolutionary and has
changed the old way of thinking.
Not exact matches
Personally i
think those specific prayers are a distraction most
of the times we pray these prayers because its what we
think we need and often thats not the case.The better
way is to just trust the holy spirit let him lead i
think we miss the awesomeness
of doing it Gods
way its easy not difficult.The struggle is difficult when we are walking by the flesh and trying to do it our
way.When i got to the point where i said to the God i am not going to do it my
way anymore and i submit to you because know whats best for me.Change me and when i feel the wrong desires or temptation to walk by the flesh i just say Lord you know i am weak and i can not live a christian life without you help me.As soon as i do that it is effortless theres no struggle thats how we should grow.I am excited with what God is doing in my life he has opened his word i am seeing the fruit
of his life impacting mine and i am
changing day by day.I am walking by faith and not slipping back into my
old desires i know what it means to be an overcomer sin does not have dominion over me anymore.In myself i can not boast because it is the power
of God at work in my life and i give all the praise back to God.brentnz
Tell us the truth when you
think that our
old ways of doing things need to
change, and though we may push back, the conversation will force us to examine why we do what we do and perhaps inspire something even greater.
I say this because no matter how successful, in an obvious
way, such preaching may be, its principal value is that «the
old - time religion» (thus conceived and proclaimed) provides for insecure and uncertain men and women an authority to which they may bow and thus be delivered, as they
think, from too much victimization by the «
changes and chances
of this mortal life».
What if your son or daughter told you they were gay?Would you follow your narrow - minded, religious bigotry, and curse them to hell?Or, could you find a
way to
change your mind and continue to love them?Would you slap your kid in the face and kick them out
of the house and ask your god why he is so cruel to little -
old you?Do yourself a favour and spend a moment
thinking on this subject before you spout your hate - fulll nonsense again... and for crying out loud, LAY OFF THE KFC!!
Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters
of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot
of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do...
old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls
of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you
think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a
way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to
change.
People can
change if they are helped to appreciate how their faith is limited by
old ways of thinking.
Science
changes and adapts and if the incoming data invalidates the
old way of thinking then the theory
changes to match the new knowledge..
Moreover, these
changes have not only set up tensions between the traditional and the new
ways of thinking and doing, but they also seem to have robbed certain
of our acts
of their meaning or else have left us puzzled about how to relate the new to the
old.
While not a Catholic I applaud the steps this Pope is trying to enact to
change old, established
ways of thinking and bring his vision to those the Gospel was created for who perhaps have been left to the wayside.
Changing old habits and
old ways of thinking.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is
changing, something some
of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks:
think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind
of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full
of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our
way (something wenger cant do because
of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration
of a
change, and a good one... lets take care
of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit
old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not
thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no
way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he
thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always
thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he
thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is
way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our
old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just
think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all
change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many
ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and
way too easily dispossessed... once again, I
think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I Liked Pires during his Arsenal playing days, which seems like many moons ago and to
think that he is still in training with the club, one can only wonder that here's another player that Wenger let go
of too early (age policy, only giving 1 year extension to 29 - 30 year
olds) More proof that Wenger is tooooo slow in
changing his stubborn
ways.
not really making the news, the atmosphere on last wednesday was really strange, silent, step by step to normal football, but you can't throw away your
thoughts immediately, I just got a glimpse
of Enkes personality during a film
of him shown before the match, I can't realize how hard it must be for his wife to lose him, tomorrow the players
of Germans first Bundesliga will wear a black ribbon again, but I
think it won't affect the atmosphere like it has with the national team despite
of Hannover
of course, people will be enthousiastic again, but there is the idea
of an «Enke donation» which I like, will keep his name alive, will take some positive emotions on this tragedy and a kind
of appeal for everyone to reflect the important things
of life and control your own behaviour, I hope so at least, and I hope his wife will cope with that situation, and again: it was really hard for the German nationl team to play under these circumstances, to lose someone close in this
way is hard to deal with, on the other hand it causes a close solidarity feeling I
think, but
of course the world will not
change, things are returning to the
old soon, but nonetheless for me this tragedy is a kind
of human wake - up call, at least a call and then you continue
This year Annika is still not
old enough to talk about it but something has
changed in my
way of thinking.
I
think one
way we can gauge where are children are in the six / seven
change is to look at their play (see the many, many back posts on play on this site about how play
changes during the six / seven year
old change), and to look at their drawings
of human beings, a house and a tree.
Chief Hegermiller added that he does not
think broadly
changing the age
of criminal responsibility is the correct
way to handle specific concerns about placing 16 - and 17 - year -
olds in adult jails.
J.H.: A lot
of the research I've been doing lately has to do with dinosaurs
changing drastically the
way they look as they get
older, and in the past people have just
thought because the littler ones were so much different than the bigger ones that they had to be different species.
Scientists have discovered traces
of life more than half - a-billion years
old that could
change the
way we
think about how all animals evolved on earth.
I have been through many phases over the last couple
of years since my father's diagnosis, he was 53 years
old and had Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease and his diagnosis
changed my life in many
ways, I spend most
of the time in denial and I keep
thinking the tests were wrong.
Realizing that I really need to
change old behaviors and
ways of thinking.
Because half
of 3 and 4 year
olds are not enrolled in pre-K today, we have an opportunity to foster disruptive innovations that could
change the
way we
think about childcare, parenting, and education.
According to Prensky, one
of the more radical consequences
of this technology - rich environment is a hypothesized
change in the brain structure that means young people
think, use and process information [2] in different
ways compared to
older generations, the digital immigrants.
Doing it this
way, I get a CHEAP FLUSH every time I
change the oil, AND I get MOST
of yesterday out
of the crankcase (I don't
think we'll EVER get out ALL
old residue).
I have hope given the ending that that
way of thinking would
change as he gets
older
One
of the most exciting and unique things about the xenosaga series is that you can look foward to seeing different character models with each new game because appearence
of the characters
change with each game, not because the characters have aged but for other reasons.There is one special thing that xenosaga episode three has that should have been in the other xenosaga games is the swimsuit mode because it allows you to watch movie scenes with the characters in there swimsuits but for some reason not all
of the movie scenes in xenosaga 3 can be viewed in swimsuit mode, I guess it would have made the movie less serious or something.My favorite movie scenes in xenosaga are blue testament, white testament, KOSMOS verses Black Testament, any movie with Luis Virgil becaus ehe is my favorite character in the game because he's passionate and i don't
think that he is a bad guy since he was able to brek free from being a testament and the only real reasons why he became a testament was because he wanted to be able to visit that
old church on miltia and to gain power to prevent death.I also love Luis Virgil and all
of the movie scenes that he appear in becaus they are very dramatic.The best thing about the xenosaga series is thst the story is very dee, interesting, and shocking and anyone who has played the game in order from episode one through three will definitely say the same thing.There is no doubt that anyone who has completed episode one and two will be stunned when every secret and mystery is unraveled in episode three.The one thing that I can't seem to under stand is why do some
of the characters have to travel back to the earth in the end, will shion and the gang make it back to earth or will there descendants finish the mission and find earth in the end, Chaos and Nephilim told the group that the key to saving humanity lies on earth, what I want to know is what is it and how will it be used to save the universe, Even in the end new mysteries arose and remained unraveled.If there is any one outher who has has the awnswer to any
of these questions please let me know when you write you're review or else there has just got to be a xenosaga four on the
way, (crying) they just can't leave the story end this
way.The only thing that dissapointed me about the game at first was the battle system because on the back
of the case
of xenosaga three said that the best aspect
of the previous battles systems from episode one were combined to form a new battle system, If namco had really done this Xenosaga episode three would have had a better battle system in my opinion because I belive that the best aspect
of xenosaga episode one were the special atacks wich are better than the those
of episode three and the best aspect
of episode three as the break system wich was also better than those
of episode three.I
think that namco should have given xenosaga episode 3 the battle system
of episode 2 combined episode ones style
of special attack, but doing this would have probably made the battle system
of xenosaga episode three boring because the same
old tactics would have to be used in a new game and the battle system most likely would not be as realistic as it is but it would probably be cooler.However the ability to summon all four Erde Kaisers including the new Erde Kasier Sgma my most favorite summon in the world at will and use new Ether and Tech attacks along with the new Counter and Revenge abilities gave xenosaaga episode three more than boost that it needed to have an descent battle systemThe E.S battle system
of xenosaga episode 3 is
way more better than those
of episod one and two though, I must say that Namco really outdid themselves with the E.S battle system
of xenosaga episode because the other E.S battle system from the two previos games weren't good, luckily they made up for it with the character battle system.In episode one I never really wanted to use anA.G.W.S, lucky for me they were optional but in episode two sadly it is manatory that you pilot an E.S to progress in the game in Episode three you piloting an E.S is also mandatory to progress in the game but the difference between the three episode is that will be sorry in episode three you will ge glad that you are using an E.S because their battle system is extremely cool.Xenosaga is most definitely one
of the besrt RPG games in the world andit is far more better than any final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES RULE!
We in the industry need to make an effort to identify the best
of these sites and embrace them, so that they are not at a disadvantage relative to the
old traditional standbys, and so that they can eventually attract a large enough audience to help
change the
way we all
think about games — for the better.
Perhaps I've just become stuck in my
ways and resistant to any
change at the ripe
old age
of 26, but I don't
think so.
The good news is that the
old way of thinking that a pharmaceutical person sells differently than a medical device sales representative is
changing.
I will help you
change these
old patterns and
ways of thinking.