Not exact matches
«Policymakers have not yet grasped the significance of
organic agriculture for resilient, reliable, non-toxic
food production, and its ability to mitigate climate
change while restoring our nation's soil health.
Primary
production will
change in the surface layers according to sun exposure, water temperature, major stratification of water masses, for example, and this will affect the
food chain down to the deep seafloor, which will be subject to differences in quantity, quality, and timing of
organic matter input.
Thirdly, urban agriculture and urban forestry contribute to disaster risk reduction and adaptation to climate
change by reducing runoff, keeping flood plains free from construction, reducing urban temperatures, capturing dust and CO2, while growing fresh
food close to consumers reduces energy spent in transport, cooling, processing and packaging, whilst productive reuse of urban
organic wastes and wastewater (and the nutrients these contain) reduces methane emissions from landfills and energy use in fertilizer
production.
The Scientific Alliance is either (using Stott's own «words of magic») «an organisation that promotes concern about the environment through rational science; while accepting climate
change as a reality, the Alliance is critical of current methods proposed to manage climate
change and energy
production» or (using the New Statesmans «words of magic»), «an anti-environmentalist campaign group that denies climate
change; opposes
organic agriculture and promotes genetically modified
foods and nuclear power»