Sentences with phrase «change science among»

With an overall budget of $ 2m (# 1.3 m) the plan would look to reshape the view of climate change science among the public and policy makers in a way that would favour the industries that stood to lose the most from regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

Not exact matches

It must be acknowledged, however, that questions such as those raised by the awareness of change are not usually included among the inquiries considered appropriate to science.

A geophysicist at the University of Washington and director of the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, he is at the forefront of research on geoengineering, a science that focuses on manipulating the environment to, among other ends, combat climate change.

She cites a study which analyzes survey data revealing that, since the mid-1970s, a falling percentage of college - educated conservatives claim to «trust science,» compared to relatively stable numbers among liberals, and argues that those who oppose contraception, question the Neo-Darwinist narrative of evolution, or disagree with certain political measures to address global climate change, are opposed to science in general....

The conclusion shared among attendees was that technology innovations in data science and guided analytics are poised to change the way the foodservice industry operates.

Example: To remove barriers to girls» participation in science education or to international collaboration among scientists principally requires policy changes rather than financial resources.

Entitled «Collaboration, Stars, and the Changing Organization of Science: Evidence from Evolutionary Biology,» the study defines stars as researchers with publication records that place them among the top 10 % of producers in their field.

Stories on the stressful impact of urban violence on children, the shared aptitudes of humans and songbirds for vocal learning, and the impact of climate change on the forests of Minnesota and beyond, are among the winners of the 2015 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Awards.

Twitter is emerging as the preferred tool among science journal editors for meeting the changing demands of their job.

The research target of science in the 21st century is hugely complex, and the relationships among science and technology, economies, nature, and society will be dramatically changed.

«That's a difficult one,» according to Nancy Lane, who moderated the Nature discussion, because real change depends on adequate funding, and this in turn depends on the government fully recognising the value of science and the economic consequences of the huge wastage rate among women scientists.

Wheelchairs and windmills are among the winners of the 2010 World changing ideas Video contest, sponsored by Scientific American and sciVee.tv, the online science video site.

However, with all of this rhetoric, the underrepresentation of minorities among the mathematics, science, and engineering (MSE) faculty has barely changed over the years.

Published in Science Advances, this research shows variation among species is attributed to differing sensitivity to climate change, and also because species vary in how much the climate has changed for them (their «exposure»).

Stories on the potential impact of climate change in two localities and on the secret lives of scientists and engineers are among the winners of the 2011 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Awards.

The study also finds that Tea Party supporters with higher levels of education are less likely to trust scientists or accept scientific consensus on topics like evolution or climate change, which runs opposite to the positive effect education has on trust in science among Independents and Democrats.

The researchers say that changing computer science stereotypes to make more students feel welcome in high school classrooms would help recruit more girls to the field, which has one of the lowest percentages of women among STEM fields.

The consensus on human - caused climate change is among the strongest observed in the sciences — about as strong as the consensus surrounding the link between smoking and lung cancer.

As my responsibilities have changed, I have come to realize that professional membership organizations like AAAS (the publisher of Science and ScienceCareers.org) and the American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB)-- the organization I direct — provide among the most effective networking opportunities that you can find, leading more often than you might imagine to new professional opportunities, as well as building a strong and lasting sense of community.

«New methods, requirements have changed data sharing among life science researchers.»

Resolution in Opposition to a Carbon Tax: Despite support for a carbon tax from ALEC members like ExxonMobil, ALEC is creating a model bill to weigh in on what will become the keystone policy battle for climate change science deniers, a battle that is already creating a rift among conservative groups, like the Koch - funded Heritage Foundation and the Heartland Institute against the R Street Institute.

Because how can we criticize science Instagrammers for somehow «failing» to change gender disparities with their posts and communication efforts, if this goal isn't even among their more important reasons for using IG??

«Technological change is happening at a faster rate than perhaps was ever thought possible, so science and maths skills are highly prized among employers.

Technology, the global job market, school choice, student expectations, political pressures, and significant advancements in what we know about how kids learn — the science of teaching — are among the forces that make changes in how schools operate and how teachers teach inevitable.

During her rambles along England's Lyme Regis coast, she picks out unusual specimens among the rocks — fossils, as it turns out, that change the course of science.

Mobile Phones: The Sensei Way to Weight Loss Originally launched in November, 2007, Weight Loss Sensei is among the first «intelligent applications» available based on Social Cognitive Theory and the science of behavioral informatics — the use of technology to promote behavior change.

The St. Louis program looked at the intersection of climate change science, artistic practice, and civic engagement, and included programs from the Judd Foundation, Mary Miss, Tattfoo Tan, and Washington University, among others.

It's probably conservatives trying to seize the attack ground in view of a possible pending debate about climate change in Washington, but the chorus of denialist opinion is so coordinated and their «logic» so simple it is convincing many, even among educated people (science PhDs) who can not be bothered to look deep into things but try to form an opinion based on a few journalistic pieces.

I have started a blog called the Climate Pioneer (theclimatepioneer.org) in which I aim, among other things, aiming to translate credible climate change science into common - speak for people like myself with a science background but who are at the same time not grounded in climate science jargon.

At Penn State I teach, among other global ethical environmental problems, the science, economics, politics, ethics and solutions to climate change.

Even among the public that accepts the science of global climate change, the dire circumstances we now face in this regard are consistently downplayed, and the logical implications that follow from the scientific analysis of the necessity to enact swift and aggressive measures to combat climate change are not followed through either intellectually or politically.

Chief among climate scientists critical of the high - sensitivity holdouts is James Annan, an experienced climate modeler based in Japan who contributed to the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

[11:12 a.m. Updated For a deeper look at social science research on the potential of communication and marketing to influence America's climate choices, I encourage you to read «Communication and Marketing as Climate Change Intervention Assets,» a paper pointed out by Matt Nisbet and Robert Brulle, among others working in that arena.]

While opinions about climate change vary greatly, even among experts in climate science, the consensus is that short - range weather events have little to do with the climate change debate.

Of course, despite ongoing advances in computer modelling technology and the millions of dollars being channelled into the problem in the UK and US, among other nations, climate change predictions are far from an exact science, and few, if any, researchers engaged in the issue have claimed as much.

Despite virtual unanimity among scientists that climate change is real, and that it is caused by human activities, people who cast doubt on climate science continue to dominate the debate.

To the extent that science knowledge influences judgments related to climate change and trust in climate scientists, it affects views among Democrats, but not Republicans.

For example, people who know more about science also tend to perceive strong consensus among climate scientists that human activity is responsible for climate change.

People's beliefs about how well climate scientists understand whether climate change is occurring and the causes of climate change are significantly linked with science knowledge among Democrats.

I would say that no doubt, the change in view among American conservatives w / r / t trust in science is a very complicated issue.

By contrast, there are no differences by science knowledge among Republicans about the causes of climate change.

In the end, I think it is reasonable to speculate that some degree of the change in perspective among conservatives w / r / t trust in science — as questionable as the validity of that measure might be in terms of measuring what it is intended to measure — is some combination of change in conservatives and changes in the nature of how science is conducted.

For instance, to the extent that science knowledge influences judgments related to climate change and trust in climate scientists, it generally influences views among Democrats, but not Republicans.

The problem was narrowly defined whereas it should have started out saying «there are a number of or many causes of climate change among which manmade causes are but one, climate science should be directed at understanding all causes of climate change and appropriate measures defined to best address including proper assessment of cost / benefit.

Among the most serious Earth science and environmental policy issues confronting society are the potential changes in the Earth's water cycle due to climate change.

A memo leaked to the New York Times in 1998 exposed its strategy of investing millions to muddy the science on climate change among «congress, the media and other key audiences».

Yet the consensus view discussed in the first part of the series is a consensus among research scientists that actually are engaged in climate change science and the most prestigious scientific organizations that have examined the relevant peer - reviewed science.

«As an influential blogger on climate change, among other subjects, I'd really like Paul to meet you and chat to you about your views — how you see your role and that more generally the influence of the internet in changing the debate; your views on climate-gate and how that was handled by the media; the failings or otherwise of scientists in communicating the science.»

Among the thousands of people «having «no prejudicial interest in climate change and climate science»», any names coming to mind?

So in a 2015 poll, they broke out the question a little to It then asks respondents which areas they would like science and innovation to prioritize over the next 15 years, with areas such as job creation, health and medical care, energy supply, education and skills, and the fight against climate change among the issues they are asked to consider.